Your USA Leader Will Protect A Calculated Murderer, At Any Cost! (Page 2): Cause your head is overflowing with anger, it is time to relax, instead of letting that anger control you try...

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

Keenan wrote:

What should the Canadian leader do about this problem of a leader of the US who sucks up to murderous dictators cuz he only cares about himself? I'm open to the idea, I just can't think of anything off the top of my head. Any ideas?

Cause your head is overflowing with anger, it is time to relax, instead of letting that anger control you try controlling it, then possibly you could make a point without a paragraph of hate preceding it.

Keenan Loc: Central Coast California

letmedance wrote:

Cause your head is overflowing with anger, it is time to relax, instead of letting that anger control you try controlling it, then possibly you could make a point without a paragraph of hate preceding it.

I am? Hnmm. I wan't feeling angry, just inquisitive. Ok, I'll try to relax even more. Now, can you please answer the question: What should the Canadian leader do about this problem?

EyeSawYou

Keenan wrote:

What should the Canadian leader do about this problem of a leader of the US who sucks up to murderous dictators cuz he only cares about himself? I'm open to the idea, I just can't think of anything off the top of my head. Any ideas?

LOL there you go again with your hypocrisy on full display! LOL It's like you never learn anything.

Obama's Double Standards For Dictators

https://www.forbes.com/sites/richardminiter/2014/08/05/obamas-double-standards-for-dictators/#3934fc5c3596

Why Obama Loves His Dictators

https://www.independentsentinel.com/why-obama-loves-his-dictators/

Obama’s troubling counterterrorism allies: dictators -

WashingtonPost! https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/fred-hiatt-obamas-troubling-counterterrorism-allies-dictators/2015/01/25/56ad3d76-a288-11e4-9f89-561284a573f8_story.html

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

EyeSawYou wrote:

Wow your ignorance is on full display once again, the electoral college makes sure that every vote counts most of the time whereas the popular vote does not. You know nothing and think you know better how to run the electoral process than our founding fathers.

Please explain how the popular vote does not ensure that every vote counts, while the electoral college does

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

EyeSawYou wrote:

So you are actually saying that the Constitution and the Founding fathers are and were NAZI's and a Nazi Document......I knew you hated the U.S. Constitution! lol

Nobody dislikes the constitution as much as the orange object of your devotion. When the conservative Chief Justice of the Supreme Court finds it necessary to dress him down, you know he's out of line. I'll bet Trump is furious that he can't fire him, and he will still be here when Trump is gone. Please don't embarrass yourself by calling Roberts a liberal.

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

Keenan wrote:

I am? Hnmm. I wan't feeling angry, just inquisitive. Ok, I'll try to relax even more. Now, can you please answer the question: What should the Canadian leader do about this problem?

The same thing the US leader did, he followed the advice of brighter men than you or I.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

letmedance wrote:

The same thing the US leader did, he followed the advice of brighter men than you or I.

There is pretty much a consensus that the American "leader" doesn't take anyone's advice "I know more than the Generals".

Keenan Loc: Central Coast California

letmedance wrote:

The same thing the US leader did, he followed the advice of brighter men than you or I.

Ok, these clauses should be two separate sentences. Not only that, but they are 2 separate topics. Because "followed the advice of brighter men" and the "US leader( as in Trump)" are so opposite they are like matter and anti-matter.

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

Keenan wrote:

Ok, these clauses should be two separate sentences. Not only that, but they are 2 separate topics. Because "followed the advice of brighter men" and the "US leader( as in Trump)" are so opposite they are like matter and anti-matter.

So you attack sentence structure because you wish not to agree with the premise.

Keenan Loc: Central Coast California

letmedance wrote:

So you attack sentence structure because you wish not to agree with the premise.

I wasn't attacking, so much as suggesting that it would make much more sense as two completely separate subjects.

EyeSawYou

thom w wrote:

Nobody dislikes the constitution as much as the orange object of your devotion. When the conservative Chief Justice of the Supreme Court finds it necessary to dress him down, you know he's out of line. I'll bet Trump is furious that he can't fire him, and he will still be here when Trump is gone. Please don't embarrass yourself by calling Roberts a liberal.

You are making sh*t up again, where did I say or imply Justice Roberts was a Liberal? Justice Roberts wasn't even a topic of discussion.

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

Probably the Grey Goose I had for dinner, only one shot on the rocks, shaken not stirred. I am a cheap drunk which is why i am almost a teetotaler.

Talk at you tomorrow, it's family time.
John

EyeSawYou

letmedance wrote:

Probably the Grey Goose I had for dinner, only one shot on the rocks, shaken not stirred. I am a cheap drunk which is why i am almost a teetotaler.

Talk at you tomorrow, it's family time.
John

Grey goose? hmmmmm tasty?

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

EyeSawYou wrote:

You are making sh*t up again, where did I say or imply Justice Roberts was a Liberal? Justice Roberts wasn't even a topic of discussion.

I didn't say you did. I simply asked you not to. The subject was disrespect for the constitution, and I offered Roberts' dress down as evidence Trump has non. When Obama disagreed with the court he said "with all due respect to the separation of powers". Trump has shown the separation of powers no respect at all.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

letmedance wrote:

Probably the Grey Goose I had for dinner, only one shot on the rocks, shaken not stirred. I am a cheap drunk which is why i am almost a teetotaler.

Talk at you tomorrow, it's family time.
John

Or, you are a cheap drunk because you are almost a teetotaler. Not suggesting you change your drinking habits, just thinking you may have cause and effect confused.