Hello all,
I recently started using "better" camera in DNG mode.
I don't do very much post processing, just basics.
Apple "Photos" is installed on my laptop.
It looks pretty easy to use...............before I take the plunge.....
Can anyone share their thoughts about using this software?
Thank you.
I use it all the time Think they just updated to handle raw, etc. does the basics
I teach Photography at the college level and adult education. For the students that have Apple computers I highly recomend Apple Photos. It is easy to use. It does 95% of all the post processing that most of my students need. There is very little that Photoshop or Elements does better unless you are really trying to change the photo into computer art. A big Plus Plus for Apple Photos.
Have used Apple's program for years. It keeps getting better.
Mac
Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
Teddys1 wrote:
Hello all,
I recently started using "better" camera in DNG mode.
I don't do very much post processing, just basics.
Apple "Photos" is installed on my laptop.
It looks pretty easy to use...............before I take the plunge.....
Can anyone share their thoughts about using this software?
Thank you.
It is excellent. The Adobe Zombies may disagree, but they probably haven't used it much if at all.
It is intuitive, but if you are nearby an Apple Store it wouldn't hurt to schedule a One-On-One session to have them go over it with you.
alby
Loc: very eastern pa.
it's easy. does what i need. have fun. you may need more in the future but it will definitely get you started.
I do not find the program to be very high level at all. I only use it for household type photo storage and would never use it for my photography work. Yes, I use Adobe products, but also use other photo products as well. Just my opinion, not a very good program at all.
via the lens wrote:
I do not find the program to be very high level at all. I only use it for household type photo storage and would never use it for my photography work. Yes, I use Adobe products, but also use other photo products as well. Just my opinion, not a very good program at all.
It has been dumbed down some what , however ...
https://gentlemencoders.com/ Raw Power opens it back up again.
Interesting back story to this.
Apple's "PHOTOS" does everything I need and I see many of the earlier posters in this thread feel the same. I don't do layers etc and just need to change brightness, contrast, sharpness, noise, color saturation etc.
Gene51
Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
Teddys1 wrote:
Hello all,
I recently started using "better" camera in DNG mode.
I don't do very much post processing, just basics.
Apple "Photos" is installed on my laptop.
It looks pretty easy to use...............before I take the plunge.....
Can anyone share their thoughts about using this software?
Thank you.
You won't really know how much post processing an image needs until with higher level skills takes a crack at an image. Most of the challenge in post processing is being able to look at an image and see where the faults are, then understanding what the opportunities might be to improve the image.
As a photographer navigates from "basics" to something more, two things can and should happen in tandem. The images are taken under "riskier" conditions - lower light, more contrasty light, scenes that require local adjustment to enhance the way a viewer experiences the image, etc. The second thing is the discovery of what is possible, by looking at the work of others, scratching one's head, and asking self, "How'd they do that?" And then figuring out the answer. Sometimes it is lighting, time of day, camera settings, but good photography is usually turned into great photography in post processing, just like the old days where the darkroom and the retoucher's desk was where the magic happened.
A photo editing solution should not limit the user to just simple, global adjustments which is what Photos and other simple programs offer. A better solution is one that is "approachable" with a logical user interface, then provide the support and tools to do more, when the user reaches a level of expertise that requires better tools.
Photos is great for someone who is a casual user and not all that interested in developing higher level skills. It will help a good number of images. So the person considering different alternatives should first ask themselves - is this all they want, or is there a path here. If there is a path to something more, then better software is in order. Rather than getting stuck in a closed end organizational system and simple workflow, a better solution might be to explore something that offers growth.
It's a personal decision and there are no right and wrong answers - just different. My thoughts - as requested.
It does basic editing well enough.I normally edit in lightroom but keep all my pics within the photos app for viewing and organising.
I didn't ever noticed that Photos did that. I just tried it and I am amazed at it. Thanks for the enlightenment
Gene51 wrote:
Photos is great for someone who is a casual user and not all that interested in developing higher level skills. It will help a good number of images. So the person considering different alternatives should first ask themselves - is this all they want, or is there a path here. If there is a path to something more, then better software is in order. Rather than getting stuck in a closed end organizational system and simple workflow, a better solution might be to explore something that offers growth.
br Photos is great for someone who is a casual us... (
show quote)
I believe that most people who do not have much, if any experience, with organizing and editing software; are looking for an easy and comfortable way to begin the process. Clearly, Apple Photos fits the bill for our new friend here. They may start as a casual user, and find that they may want to develop their skills beyond what is offered with their system--or not. Trying to decide now on something that offers growth is 'too much pressure' for someone who basically knows nothing about more robust workflow and needs. Just refer to the many threads our members create who are already involved with programs that offer so much more! Newbies should just go with the path that provides the least resistance, learning curve, and will offer them the ability to see the fruits of their labor quickly and be able to share with others easily. When the 'Force' (I couldn't resist--sorry) takes over; they will be able to better evaluate their needs and jump to more robust software. And then, they can start a new thread with more suggestions than they ever imagined.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.