You won't really know how much post processing an image needs until with higher level skills takes a crack at an image. Most of the challenge in post processing is being able to look at an image and see where the faults are, then understanding what the opportunities might be to improve the image.

As a photographer navigates from "basics" to something more, two things can and should happen in tandem. The images are taken under "riskier" conditions - lower light, more contrasty light, scenes that require local adjustment to enhance the way a viewer experiences the image, etc. The second thing is the discovery of what is possible, by looking at the work of others, scratching one's head, and asking self, "How'd they do that?" And then figuring out the answer. Sometimes it is lighting, time of day, camera settings, but good photography is usually turned into great photography in post processing, just like the old days where the darkroom and the retoucher's desk was where the magic happened.

A photo editing solution should not limit the user to just simple, global adjustments which is what Photos and other simple programs offer. A better solution is one that is "approachable" with a logical user interface, then provide the support and tools to do more, when the user reaches a level of expertise that requires better tools.

Photos is great for someone who is a casual user and not all that interested in developing higher level skills. It will help a good number of images. So the person considering different alternatives should first ask themselves - is this all they want, or is there a path here. If there is a path to something more, then better software is in order. Rather than getting stuck in a closed end organizational system and simple workflow, a better solution might be to explore something that offers growth.

It's a personal decision and there are no right and wrong answers - just different. My thoughts - as requested.

I believe that most people who do not have much, if any experience, with organizing and editing software; are looking for an easy and comfortable way to begin the process. Clearly, Apple Photos fits the bill for our new friend here. They may start as a casual user, and find that they may want to develop their skills beyond what is offered with their system--or not. Trying to decide now on something that offers growth is 'too much pressure' for someone who basically knows nothing about more robust workflow and needs. Just refer to the many threads our members create who are already involved with programs that offer so much more! Newbies should just go with the path that provides the least resistance, learning curve, and will offer them the ability to see the fruits of their labor quickly and be able to share with others easily. When the 'Force' (I couldn't resist--sorry) takes over; they will be able to better evaluate their needs and jump to more robust software. And then, they can start a new thread with more suggestions than they ever imagined.