Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Kavanaugh Annonymous Accuser comes PUBLIC
Page <<first <prev 15 of 81 next> last>>
Sep 17, 2018 15:38:42   #
FrumCA
 
dirtpusher wrote:
Sorry this one was try again

Some interesting things about Blazy Ford are beginning to surface.

1) The brother of Christine Blazey Ford worked for Fusion GPS. Wow, what a coincidence.

2) Martha G. Kavanaugh, the mother of Brett Kavanaugh, was a Maryland district judge in 1996. She was the judge in a foreclosure case in which Christine Blasey Ford’s parents were the defendants.

3) Ford's lawyer is a big Democrat donor who was involved in the Clinton / Paula Jones case.

4) Christine Blazey Ford is a far left professor and an open-borders activist who has signed anti-Trump immigration letters.

5) She also deleted her social media accounts just before coming forward. I don't blame her for that, but what would her posts reveal?

6) An ‘online professor rating site’ has numerous reviews by from her students. Some say that they think she's crazy, and they were actually scared by her behavior.”

Reply
Sep 17, 2018 15:43:08   #
hasslichhog
 
SharpShooter wrote:
Sorry Scat, Anita hill was sexual harassment. This is sexuall assault. Just a small difference. Let’s keep in mind that BEFORE she came forward, she has taken a polygraph and passed with flying colors. After the denials under oath, will Kav take a poly??? I think not.
We expect a Supreme Court Justice to be impartial on the bench if he feels it’s ok to be stumbling drunk and to assault women?
I’m sure if Tramp and Kav were to form a line to grab PUSSY, you’d fight to be first in line to get a fresh hand?!?! LoL
SS
Sorry Scat, Anita hill was sexual harassment. This... (show quote)


Polygraph results are meaningless, as some can lie an still fool poly's results. Additionally, and most important, poly results are no longer allowed in evidence in a court proceedings. So, they are meaningless.

Reply
Sep 17, 2018 15:46:10   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
FrumCA wrote:
Some interesting things about Blazy Ford are beginning to surface.

1) The brother of Christine Blazey Ford worked for Fusion GPS. Wow, what a coincidence.

2) Martha G. Kavanaugh, the mother of Brett Kavanaugh, was a Maryland district judge in 1996. She was the judge in a foreclosure case in which Christine Blasey Ford’s parents were the defendants.

3) Ford's lawyer is a big Democrat donor who was involved in the Clinton / Paula Jones case.

4) Christine Blazey Ford is a far left professor and an open-borders activist who has signed anti-Trump immigration letters.

5) She also deleted her social media accounts just before coming forward. I don't blame her for that, but what would her posts reveal?

6) An ‘online professor rating site’ has numerous reviews by from her students. Some say that they think she's crazy, and they were actually scared by her behavior.”
Some interesting things about Blazy Ford are begin... (show quote)


What that got do with a lying raper. Kinda like bill I did not have sexual relations with that woman.

An he didn't. Just a simple blow job

Reply
 
 
Sep 17, 2018 15:50:25   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
hasslichhog wrote:
Polygraph results are meaningless, as some can lie an still fool poly's results. Additionally, and most important, poly results are no longer allowed in evidence in a court proceedings. So, they are meaningless.


The last part of your post (the first probably is as well) is meaningless, as this isn't a case that will go to court. Anything the senate will allow is admissible in a senate hearing.

Reply
Sep 17, 2018 16:02:45   #
FRENCHY Loc: Stone Mountain , Ga
 
SharpShooter wrote:
Will this become a factor in the Kavanaugh appt hearings?
SS
https://heavy.com/news/2018/09/christine-blasey-ford/



Reply
Sep 17, 2018 16:08:21   #
Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa
 
thom w wrote:
The last part of your post (the first probably is as well) is meaningless, as this isn't a case that will go to court. Anything the senate will allow is admissible in a senate hearing.



How nice of you big shot genius to tell every one what has your approval. No one gives a shit what you approve of. The polygraph will be given no credence as far as innocence or guilt.

Suppose Kavanaugh took a polygraph and it shows HE is telling the truth?? Nothing is what. It cannot be held against anyone because it is not reliable. Period. I think you really are believing that you are a genius. You aren't.

Reply
Sep 17, 2018 16:11:45   #
yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon
 
dirtpusher wrote:
Not what you asked for. Is the air out your baloon


We were talking about a civilian issue. If you can’t follow a thread don’t participate.
At least I have a balloon. A big red one. No you cannot hold it. Your dirty...

Reply
 
 
Sep 17, 2018 16:25:01   #
SteveS Loc: The US is my home.
 
dirtpusher wrote:
In 1991, however, the President promulgated Military Rule of Evidence 707(a), which bars the admission of polygraph results, the opinion of the polygraph examiner, or any reference to an offer to take, failure to take, or taking of a polygraph examination in courts martial. Five years later, the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces struck down the rule as an unconstitutional restriction on the defendant's right to present a defense in a case in which the defendant sought to corroborate his testimony with the results of a polygraph test administered by an investigative arm of the Air Force. United States v. Scheffer, 41 M.J. 683

Did you read this part......


Armed Forces struck down the rule as an unconstitutional restriction on the defendant's right to present a defense in a case in which the defendant sought to corroborate his testimony with the results of a polygraph test
In 1991, however, the President promulgated Milita... (show quote)



If you're going to provide evidence at least provide all of it. In 1998 the U.S. Supreme Court reversed that decision.

Justice Thomas announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II-A, and II-D, and an opinion with respect to Parts II-B and II-C, in which The Chief Justice, Justice Scalia, and Justice Souter joined.
This case presents the question whether Military Rule of Evidence 707, which makes polygraph evidence inadmissible in court-martial proceedings, unconstitutionally abridges the right of accused members of the military to present a defense. We hold that it does not.

Did you read that part?

Reply
Sep 17, 2018 16:46:04   #
FRENCHY Loc: Stone Mountain , Ga
 
SteveS wrote:
If you're going to provide evidence at least provide all of it. In 1998 the U.S. Supreme Court reversed that decision.

Justice Thomas announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II-A, and II-D, and an opinion with respect to Parts II-B and II-C, in which The Chief Justice, Justice Scalia, and Justice Souter joined.
This case presents the question whether Military Rule of Evidence 707, which makes polygraph evidence inadmissible in court-martial proceedings, unconstitutionally abridges the right of accused members of the military to present a defense. We hold that it does not.

Did you read that part?
If you're going to provide evidence at least provi... (show quote)





Only the part he loves...

Reply
Sep 17, 2018 16:48:38   #
FrumCA
 
dirtpusher wrote:
What that got do with a lying raper. Kinda like bill I did not have sexual relations with that woman.

An he didn't. Just a simple blow job

Oh really. Now Kavanaugh is lying? That's highly unlikely.

Reply
Sep 17, 2018 16:55:48   #
idaholover Loc: Nampa ID
 
dirtpusher wrote:
So teachers don't need school supply's for the students. That why you like spurs the coward. Low educated so you think everyone should be low educated liken to you


My parents use to buy my school supplies, and my breakfast, and my lunch, and my dinner. When I went to college for a "low education" I paid for that shit. Drug addled welfare queen stroke victims like you are not in a position to judge.

Reply
 
 
Sep 17, 2018 17:06:00   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
FrumCA wrote:
Oh really. Now Kavanaugh is lying? That's highly unlikely.


He a politicans judge is he not.

Reply
Sep 17, 2018 17:09:47   #
idaholover Loc: Nampa ID
 
dirtpusher wrote:
He a politicans judge is he not.


So, you can have yours when you win an election, but we can't have ours when we win an election, no?
I give you Ginsberg, Mayor and Kagan.

Now, put some preparation H on it.

Reply
Sep 17, 2018 17:11:15   #
idaholover Loc: Nampa ID
 
dirtpusher wrote:
He a politicans judge is he not.

https://www.businessinsider.com/supreme-court-kennedy-ginsburg-retirement-sotomayor-trump-4-appointments-2018-6

here ya go
here ya go...

Reply
Sep 17, 2018 17:12:43   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
idaholover wrote:
My parents use to buy my school supplies, and my breakfast, and my lunch, and my dinner. When I went to college for a "low education" I paid for that shit. Drug addled welfare queen stroke victims like you are not in a position to judge.


Dang parent bought your education. While I hauled hay to get my start education. Even after got out the uniform on the side.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 15 of 81 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.