Mainly a filter acts as a protector in case something would scratch the front of the lens, or you should happen to drop liquid on the lens by accident while walking and lose the lens cap. It also adds color to the photo when you are taking outdoor landscape photos.
Up to 6400 inside churches, ... Outdoor is fine. I have not looked at them in PS CC RAW editor. Increasing exposure may resolve it.
Mark
markwilliam1 wrote:
Thanks Mark! What do you mean by low light and what ISO were you shooting?
Gene51
Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
bwana wrote:
Not too sure why you'd want to add filters in front of an excellent lens!? I've never felt the need for filters on any camera other than for special effects.
bwa
I routinely put a polarizer and sometimes an ND filter. They work fine other than needing to remove the lens hood because I am using my 77mm filters and an adapter ring.
Gene51
Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
bnsf wrote:
Are you using any UV filter on the lens? I seen that B&H has a set by Hoya 3 UV filters and a Polarizer filter 72mm that would fit nicely $62.00. You can change the UV filter according to the amount of sunlight outside. I am going to order the set and try it out.
I don't usually use UV. I do have and use a B&W polarizer, 77mm that I step down to 72 for this camera.
markwilliam1 wrote:
OMG! Beautiful pictures! I’ve never been able to shoot BIF with my a77ii and my long lens. The tracking was Terrible on the a77ii! That’s what I bought the camera for and am deeply disappointed! When are they going to deliver my RX10m4?? Lol!
Thanks for the kind comment.
The problem could be with the lens focussing speed, not the camera. I have shot thousands of BIF with the a77 and Sony 70-400 lens, version 1. At first I thought it was my technique but as I practiced and adjusted and still had lots of not-quite-in focus photos, I decided it was the lens. I thought about trading up for the version 2 of the lens which is supposed to be faster focussing...but then decided on this camera instead. The phase-detect autofocus is astonishingly fast and accurate.
I think price is an indication of optical quality! My opinion as I’ve used cheap Hoya filters in the past and the results weren’t good. How are B&W filters lacking optically? Never heard that before.
Gene51
Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
markwilliam1 wrote:
I think price is an indication of optical quality! My opinion as I’ve used cheap Hoya filters in the past and the results weren’t good. How are B&W filters lacking optically? Never heard that before.
Did you read the information in the links I posted? The answer to your question is right there.
i just did gene51 and I stand corrected Sir Thanks!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.