Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
50 mm Lenses
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
Aug 8, 2018 15:29:42   #
Pepsiman Loc: New York City
 
Charlie'smom wrote:
The 50mm 1.8 is excellent when shooting people is social situations. Great bokeh.


Agree

Reply
Aug 8, 2018 15:46:45   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
mwoods222 wrote:
I have a Nikon D7100 + 18 - 200 mm and 18 - 300 mm lenses. The 300 is a little heavy but I use it to photograph ships in my back yard on the Hudson river with a tripod. See my website at "woodywud.smugmug.com".
Now Adorama had a flash sale on some Nikkor prime lenses so on a whim I purchased 50 mm lens which I got today with the excitement of something I thought I needed. But now in retrospect do I realy need it. I am trying to think of situations where the 50 mm would be better but I can't
think of one. The 18 - 200 mm lens weight is not that much heavier then the 50mm lens and up to now has done what i needed with that extra reach which we like to know is available
Can anyone tell me why I need the 50mm in my bag
I have a Nikon D7100 + 18 - 200 mm and 18 - 300 mm... (show quote)


BECAUSE.

Reply
Aug 8, 2018 16:14:32   #
davidb1879
 
Why not use the 50 and see if it meets your needs. If you decide that it is not the lens for you, As long as you are very careful and keep the original box and wrappings, you can return it to Adorama within 30 days of purchase, for a full refund or another product, no questions asked. Davidb1879

Reply
 
 
Aug 8, 2018 16:48:34   #
sxrich
 
With no offense intended, if you ask that question, you don't need the lens and don't seem to want it either. The focal length is covered with your zooms. What is not apparent to you by virtue of your shooting needs, is the benefit of a fast lens ie aperture let us say between 2.8 and 1.8 or 1.4 etc. You don't know what you don't know and that's fine and again, not meant as a criticism. I also have a d7100 along with a d750. I had the 50mm 1.8 years ago when I had a d5100. I bought it for low light or in home without flash use and found the field of view (equiv to a 75mm) too close for many situations ie birthday parties, family gatherings. On the full frame d750, much better and a real representation of 50mm glass. Eventually I went on to shoot some paid gigs like weddings, portraits etc and i found the value of fast glass, especially when I couldn't use flash or other low light shooting, a necessity. So, the cost of the new 50 1.8 is about $217 which is a steal for the quality and speed all things considered. Try pricing a new 24-70 2.8 or 70-200 2.8 and you're above $2k. As your needs change, the 50mm 1.8 might become much more of a value add but right now, send it back. If you doubt what I'm saying, that's fine but try some some low light shots without flash with your zooms and see what the noise is like. Then, take the 50 shoot wide open at 1.8 compare the noise. You may see the difference, especially on the d7100.

Reply
Aug 8, 2018 17:26:01   #
carl hervol Loc: jacksonville florida
 
I like the 50 because it small and light just remember on a crop camera it going to be about 80mm if you won't it to be a 50 on your camera get 35mm it will be 52.5 mm on your camera .

Reply
Aug 8, 2018 17:28:54   #
mwoods222 Loc: Newburg N.Y,
 
I get your point. I kinda know about the close quarters advantage and will be taking advantage of it tomorrow I was looking to lightening my carry.
Ihave been schooled on low light. Thanks for your insight.

Reply
Aug 8, 2018 17:29:30   #
mwoods222 Loc: Newburg N.Y,
 
mwoods222 wrote:
I get your point. I kinda know about the close quarters advantage and will be taking advantage of it tomorrow I was looking to lightening my carry.
I have been schooled on low light. Thanks for your insight.

Reply
 
 
Aug 8, 2018 19:09:45   #
chipmt2
 
I use a 50 mm f1.4 lense in low light situations and wide open when I want shallow depth of field. Always have it with me. First lense I bought in 1972.

Reply
Aug 8, 2018 20:05:39   #
Booker
 
My favorite lens is the 50mm. I've used it on my DX camera for models (=75mm) and often for people photography. I bought one for my D800 when I got it. In the old days we "zoomed with our feet!" It's the sharpest lens in my kit, and I love the flexibility of depth of field (one is a 1.4mm, the other 1.8).

Reply
Aug 8, 2018 20:07:33   #
User ID
 
`

My sister has a 50/1.4 on a Rebel. It's not
like she figgered out what she needed. The
sales person prolly decided he'd make a bit
of extra commission on an otherwise cheap
sale. However my sister just uses it. To her,
it's not "portrait" nor "normal". It is what it
is and does what it does, no problem.

`

Reply
Aug 8, 2018 20:56:23   #
MrGNY Loc: New York
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
You need the 35mm 1.8 DX more than you need a 50mm.


Sweet lens for the money! :)

Reply
 
 
Aug 8, 2018 21:29:00   #
throughrhettseyes Loc: Rowlett, TX
 
If you think of a 50mm as a 75mm because you have a crop sensor. It would be great for portraits. I would recommend a 35mm f/1.8 also for street photography with a crop sensor. I have a D500 and a 50mm f/1.8 auto focus lens and it's pretty nice. I have an older 28mm f/1.8 manual lens and fine it fun too.

Reply
Aug 8, 2018 21:46:06   #
Murray Loc: New Westminster
 
CO wrote:
The 50mm probably has an f/1.4 or f/1.8 maximum aperture. That's great for low light conditions and will help to achieve a shallow depth of field for portraits. I have a Tamron 45mm f/1.8 SP VC lens. The large max. aperture and the vibration compensation make it a great low light lens.

Another great thing about prime lenses is they usually have almost zero distortion. The engineers can optimize the lens around one focal length. Look at these test shots of the Nikon 50mm f/1.8 and Nikon 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 lens at 50mm.

This is how they described the distortion of the 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 lens:

Already at 35 mm the pincushion distortion becomes quite intense, soaring to +2.24%, and by 50 mm it is even higher as its value reaches +2.71%. It is one of the highest pincushion distortion results we've ever seen in our tests.
The 50mm probably has an f/1.4 or f/1.8 maximum ap... (show quote)


My sentiment exactly. I also have a 35mm. I have read that the optics on prime lenses are better generally than zooms.

Reply
Aug 8, 2018 22:00:23   #
cjc2 Loc: Hellertown PA
 
DaveO wrote:
That's why I tell people to use the kit lens or zoom most have and see what focal lengths they typically use.

The 50 fits nicely on a shelf with my 35,85 and 105. I have them in a line in ascending order and they look quite nice.


I have all of those plus the 20 and 28. I have two 35s - a Nikon 35/2D and a Nikon 35/1.8G DX, two 50s - a Nikon 50/1.8G and a Sigma ART 50/1.4 and finally two 105s - a Nikon 105/2.8D Micro and a Nikon 105/1.4G. I use all of them quite a bit in a year's time. Some I use for indoor sports, some I use for portrait work, some for events and some for just the fun of it! Can never have enough lenses, as long as you use them. I'm not interested in selling any of them, except perhaps the DX lens if I would replace my D500 with a FF body or a mirrorless. If I did that I might pick up a Nikon 85/1.8G for my indoor sports work as well. Best of luck to all.

Reply
Aug 9, 2018 10:27:11   #
stogieboy Loc: Marlboro, NY
 
mwoods222 wrote:
I have a Nikon D7100 + 18 - 200 mm and 18 - 300 mm lenses. The 300 is a little heavy but I use it to photograph ships in my back yard on the Hudson river with a tripod. See my website at "woodywud.smugmug.com".
Now Adorama had a flash sale on some Nikkor prime lenses so on a whim I purchased 50 mm lens which I got today with the excitement of something I thought I needed. But now in retrospect do I realy need it. I am trying to think of situations where the 50 mm would be better but I can't
think of one. The 18 - 200 mm lens weight is not that much heavier then the 50mm lens and up to now has done what i needed with that extra reach which we like to know is available
Can anyone tell me why I need the 50mm in my bag
I have a Nikon D7100 + 18 - 200 mm and 18 - 300 mm... (show quote)


I just happened to find this website this morning, and lo and behold, the second post I click on is from a neighbor to the south (I live in Marlboro, overlooking the Hudson as well). As far as your question about the 50mm lens, I also have this lens, and I use it quite often. This part of NY has many wineries and festivals, as you probably know, and as someone else stated, this lens is GREAT for social situations, capturing candid shots. You can get close shots of people in the crowd, without being on top of them. I prefer it to my 35mm lens for this reason. I had a similar reaction to yours when I first got my 50mm, but I forced myself to get accustomed to it by taking it out as my only lens a few times. After figuring out what works and what doesnt, I have really come to appreciate this lens. I have the 18-300mm as well, and that is the main lens I use because the 8 year old son is quite active, but for those social settings, my 50mm is always close by.

-Mike

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.