Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
African Safari lens/lenses
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Jul 18, 2018 09:02:12   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
KEN SPECKLER wrote:
Have Nikon D7200 and 18-300. Thinking about buying 80-400.
Also considering another D7200 body to use with my 12-24 or 16-80.
Appreciate your thoughts/advice.


You could save yourself some money and get better reach with the Nikon 200-500. It gets very positive reviews and I have used mine now for two years in Florida and love it. I have had the 80-400 and IMHO the 200-500 is not only focuses faster but I believe I get sharper images. On your D7200 you would have an effective focal length of 300-750, I would take the 16-80 also, another fantastic Nikon lens, I use mine as a companion to my 200-500. The 200-500 is currently on sale making it an even better value.
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1175034-REG/nikon_af_s_nikkor_200_500mm_f_5_6e.html?sts=pi-ps
I would however be aware of the dusty conditions that exist on your Safari and very very, very careful changing lenses in the field.
The following is an image of a juvenile Night Heron taken with the 200-500.



Reply
Jul 18, 2018 09:19:52   #
gvarner Loc: Central Oregon Coast
 
I suspect that a quality tour guide will get you in close to your subjects. Factor that into your dilemma. Your quality sensor and cropping in post can bring distance subjects into a better composition.

Reply
Jul 18, 2018 09:24:24   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
KEN SPECKLER wrote:
Have Nikon D7200 and 18-300. Thinking about buying 80-400.
Also considering another D7200 body to use with my 12-24 or 16-80.
Appreciate your thoughts/advice.


Get the 200-500. You won’t want to fumble with two cameras.

The 18-300 is OK to use in camp but an 18-50 would also do for that.

Reply
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
Jul 18, 2018 09:24:47   #
PaulB Loc: Alabama
 
One mistake that many photo safari participants make is thinking that they need super long lenses. Having been on two African trips, I found that the guides routinely get you within reach of animals where a 300 or 400 mm lens is more than adequate (think 70-300 mm or 18-400 mm). Lions, giraffes, elephants and such are used to safari vehicles getting fairly close (although elephants can be a bit feisty at times , if babies are around). I would definitely take either a backup camera body or a point and shoot with a decent zoom lens just in case. Extra batteries, appropriate chargers, lens cleaning supplies, a bean bag for steadying longer lenses are additional recommendations.

Reply
Jul 18, 2018 09:30:22   #
wireloose
 
Best to ask about lens support. I had a private open truck in Ruaha, so tripod and gimbal head which was ideal. Beanbags are better for The more enclosed vehicles in dusty locations. Monopods are a good compromise, that big glass gains weight as the drive goes on.

Reply
Jul 18, 2018 09:30:43   #
rosjan
 
I went on safari last year and took too much equipment. It was a real drag lugging it around. I'm going back next year and will be taking a Tamron 100-400mm and Nikon 18-140mm for my D7200. Last time the longest lens I took was a 70-300mm and was quite happy with my photos. This time I want to take something with just a little more reach. Have fun. It's a wonderful experience.

Reply
Jul 18, 2018 09:37:15   #
larrybaill
 
Just got back from Africa where we went on safaris in South Africa, Botswana and Zambia. My go to lense was a Nikon 80-400 which was everything I needed it to be without being too big or heavy to manage.

Reply
Check out People Photography section of our forum.
Jul 18, 2018 10:17:58   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
Consider an all purpose long zoom such as a 150-600mm because you don't want to have to change lenses in dusty conditions in the field.

Reply
Jul 18, 2018 10:35:14   #
DJD Loc: Seal Beach, CA
 
I went to Tanzania (Serengeti), Kenya (Masa Mara) and Namibia last year and brought my Nikon 80-400 (used with D500). It produced excellent results. Using higher speeds and higher ISO, I was able to hand hold with no problem. If you can take a second camera with you for wide angle that would be great. Keep in mind that you'll run across animals that are just off the road making a large telephoto impractical. Also, there is way too much dust to change lens' in the field In fact, I had to have cameras and lens professionally cleaned upon my return. On our small internal flights I was concerned about the weight restrictions. However, all our checked luggage (16 people) was weighed together, providing some wiggle room for our carry-ons. Have a great trip. Post pics.

Reply
Jul 18, 2018 11:11:16   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
DJD wrote:
I went to Tanzania (Serengeti), Kenya (Masa Mara) and Namibia last year and brought my Nikon 80-400 (used with D500). It produced excellent results. Using higher speeds and higher ISO, I was able to hand hold with no problem. If you can take a second camera with you for wide angle that would be great. Keep in mind that you'll run across animals that are just off the road making a large telephoto impractical. Also, there is way too much dust to change lens' in the field In fact, I had to have cameras and lens professionally cleaned upon my return. On our small internal flights I was concerned about the weight restrictions. However, all our checked luggage (16 people) was weighed together, providing some wiggle room for our carry-ons. Have a great trip. Post pics.
I went to Tanzania (Serengeti), Kenya (Masa Mara) ... (show quote)


Yes, you’ll find the 200 end of the 200-500 more than you want at times. But the animals or the driver will move away...the latter if you ask.

BTW, one thing I found most usefull was to use M mode at f5.6 and 1/500 with auto iso. Then there was no fumbling when time was short. My hand held images were all good...mostly at 500mm on a D800.

Reply
Jul 18, 2018 11:30:48   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
wireloose wrote:
Best to ask about lens support. I had a private open truck in Ruaha, so tripod and gimbal head which was ideal. Beanbags are better for The more enclosed vehicles in dusty locations. Monopods are a good compromise, that big glass gains weight as the drive goes on.


All 4 of the camps I went to had the open land cruiser layout so beanbags were not usable. I tried the monopod one day and it was awkward and worse than handholding because of people wiggle. Put it back in the luggage.

https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-389048-1.html

https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-389160-1.html

https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-389474-1.html

https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-394565-1.html

https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-394617-1.html

https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-397952-1.html



Handholding my 200-500 w D800 was no problem because most of the time it was in my lap or in the center seat.

PS: I can see that beanbags might work in the stand-up van type vehicles...but would wonder if they are better than resting your arms to insulate people induced wiggle.

Reply
 
 
Jul 18, 2018 11:42:10   #
ldmarsh
 
I am a Canon shooter and have been to Africa on safari several times. I use a Tamron 150-600mm G2 with very good results. Some of my travelling companions use the Nikon 200-500 with good results also. A long lens is a must. Two bodies are almost essential so you don't have to change lens when out in the field as travel can be very dusty. I also use a 70-200mm, and a 24-105 wide angle for the beautiful landscapes.

Reply
Jul 18, 2018 11:47:34   #
Toxdoc
 
I went last year for 3 weeks. I took my d810 and I purchased the sigma 100-400 which I used almost exclusively for the animals and landscapes I also took my rx100 3 which i carried in my pocket used it for photos of the people. Had several other lenses with me which I didn't use much. Take as little as you can because space is limited in the safari vans ad you have to carry the stuff which gets heavy. Also take a good pair of binoculars. Most of all have fun and enjoy it's an experience of a lifetime

Reply
Jul 18, 2018 13:34:45   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
I think the 400 will be too short. Benno Ibold, who can be found on fb, has done several African safaris and taken wonderful photos with a Canon dx camera and Sigma 50-500mm lens, which was very sharp. He recently upgraded to the Sigma 150-600 Contemporary, but he does annual trips. The 50-500 would probably be less expensive. I'd recommend that.

Benno also has a second dx in his bag which I'm sure he has another lens like a 50mm mounted on.

Reply
Jul 18, 2018 13:41:40   #
Moondoggie Loc: Southern California
 
I recently took a four week trip to South Africa,Botswana,Zimbabwe and Zambia. Rarely will you be walking around, most of the tours are in a Safari Land Cruiser. The guides get you very close to the animals, at times a bit scary...like 5 feet from a Lion or Leopard. I have a D5300 and took only one lens, Tamron 18-400 that worked very well for me.









Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.