Charles 46277 wrote:
Warrior, jurisprudence and politics aside, I wonder how the State of Nebraska hopes to collect the money from me, the seller, in Kentucky. It is always the seller that must collect sales taxes and give them over to the state. Buyers, even in Nebraska, have no tax number there (and neither do I). Nebraska cannot search my sales records without a warrant that is valid here in KY, right? And they need probable cause for that.
I have not read the actual court decision, but I doubt they said that if I sell by mail or Internet I must get a tax number in all 50 states. (In the past, some states got around this by making me collect sales taxes for them on all sales--or pay the sales tax to another state if I had stores in that state. In other words, I already had a tax number there.) If I have no stores there, I have no tax number there.
Their decision raises new questions, even if we agree that sales tax should be paid. If I drive across the state line and buy something to be delivered in my home state, there is not only a question of who gets the sales tax, but what the correct tax rate would be. I often buy groceries in TN, where the food sales tax is almost 10%, but live in KY, where the food tax is zero. If I buy a box of candies in KY, to be sent to TN, why should that not be taxed at the KY rate (zero)? Mail or Internet should not change the tax from what it would be in the store, should it?
Warrior, jurisprudence and politics aside, I wonde... (
show quote)
You've got a zip code, don't you? I'd imagine that in this day of computerized technology it will be a snap to match zip codes and tax rates.