Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Add Nikon Macro Lens
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
May 25, 2018 13:49:11   #
Bob Boner
 
The 200mm MicroNikor is one of the best macro lens I have used (out of a total of 4). The 200 is much better than the 105 if you plan to photograph insects--don't get so close so you don't frighten them so much..

Reply
May 26, 2018 00:20:54   #
Bozsik Loc: Orangevale, California
 
Screamin Scott wrote:
An addendum: What to choose also depends on your intended subject. I have found the 90-105 mm range to be the most convenient. Many will say you need a longer focal length for insects. A quick perusal of my Flickr stream will show many insects and almost all done with a 1980's MF 105. You need to know your subjects behaviours as well. For instance, a Dragonfly may fly off but many times will return to the same perch, so patience is a virtue. Don't get bogged down with tests as many are bench tests and don't reflect real world shooting.
An addendum: What to choose also depends on your i... (show quote)


Dotto. Good advice.

Reply
May 26, 2018 06:58:27   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
You do not get less depth of field with longer focal lengths. Focal length only affects the subject distance, and of course longer lenses may be less convenient to handle, but for any given reproduction ratio and aperture, depth of field will be the same, regardless of the focal length used. .

Reply
 
 
May 26, 2018 12:23:07   #
GED Loc: North central Pa
 
boncarbo42 wrote:
Newbie just getting started late and saying thanks to the members and their educating posts. I am wanting to add final (my wife's hope) lens to my batch and wanting a dedicated macro to use on a Nikon D600 or D500. Considering a refurbished Nikon 200/f4 thru B&H. Have not done macro previously so welcome any suggestions of that vs the Nikon 105mm. Thinking the distance from lens to subject is important. Appreciate any thoughts


I use both of those lenses and you can't go wrong with either one, you have to decide what your going to be photographing mostly to determine how much working distance you need. For insects, reptiles and amphibians, and any other critters you don't want to frighten the 200mm would be my choice. If I could only have one or the other it would be the 200/4.

Reply
May 27, 2018 01:42:48   #
Bozsik Loc: Orangevale, California
 
Bozsik wrote:
Dotto. Good advice.


Of course this was supposed to be Ditto, Duh. My bad. But if I were going to choose an all-around micro to use, I would go with the 105mm. You can pick up a 105mm 2.8G Micro that would be in almost new condition for about $300.00. I have 2 of them as well as the newer version with the VR, and a non-autofocus 200 f4. They are all dedicated to specific tasks, but the one I use the most is the 105mm.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.