I have no idea what is going on with you and LA Shooter to cause him to block you nor is that any of my business. But getting to the people you mention on the Republican side and the Mueller investigation, yes some people have pled guilty to crimes, some incredibly minor that hardly anyone ever is indicted for. But, and this is an important point, well worth considering, is that not one of the people who have been indicted or pled guilty have been guilty of colluding with the Russians to alter the election results. Not one. Each has been charged or found guilty of minor crimes having no relationship to the colluding theory you Liberals push.

On the contrary, you don't mention anything about President Obama who actually did use $350,000 of taxpayer money to alter the Israeli election of Prime Minister Netanyahu. You also don't mention anything about Hillary, the DNC, Debbie Wasserman Shultz and Donna Brazille who ALL colluded not only to sink Bernie Sanders' chance at the Presidency. Nor do you mention Donna Brazille giving Hillary questions to one of the Primary debates. Even if President Trump DID collude with the Russians, that does not mean there is any crime involved. So to make a big stink about Trump colluding while ignoring President Obama's meddling in the Israeli is pretty hypocritical isn't it? Calling Trump a cheat while ignoring all of Hillary's corrupt and unethical moves is pretty hypocritical as well isn't it?

Almost every day I get emails from various places that point out that Comey lied, Brennan lied, Eric Holder lied and we already know that Hillary and Obama both lied about Benghazi, with regard to what caused the attack in the first place. Why don't I ever as in EVER see you on the Left complaining about these people lying? I am citing facts here, not some vast Right Wing Conspiracy theory as Hillary claims. If the Left is so moral and interested in the truth then why not be moral and want the truth in all of it, rather than just demand that Republicans be truthful, honest and ethical? Isn't that supposed to be the Democratic way, the high road; you know what I mean.

Oh, about Hillary being indicted maybe you should check with the Obama justice department starting at Attorney General Loretta Lynch and her meeting with Bill Clinton, then move on down one notch to the FBI, James Comey, Andrew McCabe and then just a smaller notch downward to Strzok and Paige. These people, ALL, had a hand in the Hillary investigation over 30,000 emails, passing classified documents and so on. Yet we know now that there really was not a real investigation. You know as well as I do that Hillary's attorney having classified documents on her computer is illegal. Huma Abedin having classified documents on her computer and Anthony Weiner's computer is illegal. Yet they were there. Now if it was so important to get into Cohen's computer files then why wasn't it just as important to get into these computers of Hillary's people who DID have classified documents on their computers. But somehow in the fairytale land of the Left, under Obama's Presidency, that was all OK and seemingly appropriate. Now if you really want to tell yourself that this all above board and legal then have at it. But we ALL know that Hillary is guilty but was never going to be prosecuted under the Obama reign.

Have a wonderful day,

Dennis

Has anybody thought why the Russians interfered with the election (There is pretty clear evidence that they did but not who encouraged them to do so) The general train of thought is that the social media was biased toward Mr Trump. Does that mean that the Russians thought Trump would be less of a threat to them than Hilary. If you were trying to bias an election you wouldn't make it towards your least favourable candidate. Not saying Mr Trump had any part of it I don't think he did, just standing back and assessing for and against. I can't quite follow the logic of the Russians because traditionally i.e. Republicans = Absolutely Hate Russians. Democrats = Don't quite hate them as much. You guy's got any thought's apart from the usual schoolboy taunts.

I don't have any ideas along the lines of why the Russians interfered with our election except maybe just to screw with us. I have not seen anything that showed they had a preference of who would win. Actually Obama pretty much said it would be impossible for the Russians to actually do anything to interfere with our elections. I know the general consensus from people I know is that they had their mind made up pretty much who they would vote for anyway. The Russians had nothing to do with it.

What amazes me is that the Liberals blame Trump for collusion as if it was a bad thing, yet they have never said anything against Obama for interfering in the Israeli election process using $350,000 of taxpayer money. Apparently if a Liberal does that it is acceptable but if a Conservative does it (I am not saying that Trump did it nor do I think he did) it is just terrible and an impeachable offense.

I also find it very strange that Obama knew of the Russian interference before the election yet did absolutely nothing to deter it. Is that because he just knew that Hillary would win the election anyway and didn't want to mess with the supposed to happen success of Hillary? Liberals here on UHH never find the time to answer those two questions.

It is common knowledge that Hillary cheated in the election with the help of the DNC and others but apparently the Liberals don't mind that and approve of it.

Dennis

Trump claimed that he would unite the country. How can that be when he persists in highly partisan campaigning since his election? He feels persecuted when he is unable to push his unconstitutional travel ban through; he seems to feel that the Justice Department is his personal weapon against his "enemies," to cite only two examples.

When will Trump realize that the election is over? Campaigning is fun for him, since he is an accomplished huckster, but now the hard work of governance must begin. Such work should include bridge-building, but Trump seems incapable of realizing that compromise may well be the best way to achieve his purposes. Of course, compromise necessitates that one admit error in some fashion, and Trump is incapable of acknowledging error in any form.