Yes, "rehess", you're quite right about Kodak notifying us about Kodachrome being Archival (100+ years) while Ektachrome held up better with slide projection. Only my early versions of
Ektachromes have any "fading" or off-color problems, but beginning with the "Lumiere" version
of Ektachrome and subsequent improvements, I had no such problems and my Agency clients
preferred either Ektachrome or Velvia (I refused to shoot exaggerated Velvia). In the 1990's
Kodak came out with E-100G (& E-100GX, a warm version) which were truly excellent. Most of
my professional work was done on Kodachrome-II (best of all!!) then later on Kodachrome-64.

Film cameras: R.I.P. Every day I am looking on UHH for information about film cameras. I not finding any information on film cameras. Oh yes , people will reply saying their have film cameras and then go back writing about their digital cameras. I hope I not the only one who like using film camera and could give a dam about digital cameras. I find nuts is reading about someone who pay $2,000 for XYZ digital camera and pay $1,000 for a lens to fit on the camera. Knowing that the camera is none more than a electricity item that will be obsolete by year's end. Yes, there is film cameras that will cost $3,000 with lens. But you known that you can get your $3,000 back. Can one said the same for digital camera? How about set a part of UHH just for film cameras.