Haydon wrote:
Jaymatt, he's a big name. He was an Explorer of Light for 18 years. I believe there are only 100 in the world at any one time holding that title. He's world renowned in avian photography.
Then I’d guess there’s cash behind the switch.
WJShaheen wrote:
Did you mean to say 3 N's? (It's been annoying me too for some time. "Cannon" And I was in the artillery!)
Cannon PI once shot a Canon from a cannon with another Canon mounted on a cannon on Cannon Mountain.
David Burnett seems to be open to trying new approaches in making photographs. He covered John Kerry's 2004 campaign using a 4X5 Speed Graphic with a 178mm Aero Ektar lens from an old aerial camera. From mid Twentieth Century technology to finally entering the Twenty First Century. To quote his Peta Pixel video.
I believe it is the Nikon autofocus speed shooting birds in flight, period.
Chuck Yeager used to get in discussions about one plane being a better plane , fighters that is. He would go up in one type of plane while his protagonist would use anothet. He'd wax their tail every time. Like people always say al least in most instances it's the person behind the camera
I'm sure there are technically some differences but when it comes down to it it's the person pulling the trigger not the gun.
So is it the camera or the photographer that take great pictures? Should I buy a better lens, camera, both or give up?
To a certain point you get what you pay for , but that point is very elusive at times. If you couldn't move up to more expensive you might be more encouraged to do better with what you have.
billnikon wrote:
Nikon has gone to a separate operating chip just for focusing. Nikon has put it on the D5, D500, and the D850. It is extremely fast and extremely accurate.
If this is the sole reason for the switch, he may have jumped the gun. I worked for Canon USA for 23 years way back when. It seemed to me sometimes they would innovate and sometimes they would counterpunch, usually with something better. Incorporating a separate chip for specific camera functions does not seem to be monumental technical roadblock. Canon has lots of experience in semiconductor technology. Maybe they might have something better up their sleeve.
ralphfr wrote:
If this is the sole reason for the switch, he may have jumped the gun. I worked for Canon USA for 23 years way back when. It seemed to me sometimes they would innovate and sometimes they would counterpunch, usually with something better. Incorporating a separate chip for specific camera functions does not seem to be monumental technical roadblock. Canon has lots of experience in semiconductor technology. Maybe they might have something better up their sleeve.
If you go to his blog, he explains why he switched. It was not just one thing.
---
It's GAS, Even the best get attacks.
Bill_de wrote:
If you go to his blog, he explains why he switched. It was not just one thing.
---
Agreed, Canon dropped using him as EoL, distanced themselves from him, Artie found something that works for him better and made a move. This is according to what I read. Artie has stated that he can be a little bristly at times. Many factors as you stated Bill.
Arthur Morris is an old master. I've met him and talked with him. IMO, he shares a lot of characteristics of the classic artist in terms of temperament. He has a great ego as all who are artists, innovators, and leaders have. But, disagree or disrespect him at your own peril.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.