Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Pocketable long zoom cameras ... how good can they be?
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Sep 28, 2017 22:52:05   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
ChrisT wrote:
Which one do YOU have? ... Are you happy with the results?

I've never owned a bridge camera. They all have a truly tiny sensor, and that limits its utility to me.

Reply
Sep 28, 2017 23:53:09   #
Chris T Loc: from England across the pond to New England
 
rehess wrote:
I've never owned a bridge camera. They all have a truly tiny sensor, and that limits its utility to me.


This one's about pocketable long zoom cameras. I think the term "bridge camera" applies to those cameras which, except for the sensor, look and act like SLRs, except, they don't have interchangeable lenses.

Pocketable long zooms could refer to rangefinders, or other small cameras with fixed lenses with long zoom ratios, which fit in your pocket. They might not necessarily have a viewfinder, but, then, they might, too. And - apparently, some of them have quite a bit larger sensors, than you tend to see in the standard bridge cameras.

Reply
Sep 29, 2017 06:25:06   #
74images Loc: Los Angeles, California
 
I Bought a Canon Powershot 150 Camera from Target at a Reduced Price in January 2013, that Canon Had Discontinued & Because of its Long Zoom, & Features that were Way Better that was not on My 2 Nikon Coolpix Cameras I Bought in 2007 & 08.

It's My Main Pocket Point & Shoot & #2 Camera I Carry Most of the Time When I Don't Have to Lug My Canon SX50 Around.

74images

Reply
 
 
Sep 29, 2017 07:48:28   #
Blaster34 Loc: Florida Treasure Coast
 
The good thing is that as fast as technology is evolving, you should have about 22 cameras by 2024 ☺️ Seems to just accumulate, doesn't it?

Reply
Sep 29, 2017 08:57:33   #
Hudsonwi Loc: Wisconsin
 
Canon SX280HS works great for in the pocket travel. 20X zoom and I also got good solar eclipse pictures with it.

Reply
Sep 29, 2017 09:40:36   #
JPL
 
ChrisT wrote:
Which one do YOU have? ... Are you happy with the results?


What is pocketable? Are you referring to your pants pockets? If so I have a Nokia Lumia 1020 in my pocket most of the time. It works well for many things.
If you are referring to bigger pockets, like my overcoat pockets I sometimes put a Nikon 1J5 and couple lenses in the pockets. It works well for many things.
And if I would want to carry smaller camera than the Nikon in my pockets and still get good pics I would probably buy the Pansonic ZS100. That seems to be the smallest camera you can get with good image quality and good zoom range. Reviews say it works well for many things.

Reply
Sep 29, 2017 10:03:05   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
Blaster34 wrote:
The good thing is that as fast as technology is evolving, you should have about 22 cameras by 2024 ☺️ Seems to just accumulate, doesn't it?

Unless / until smart phones figure out how to do telephoto zoom well in a graceful manner {i.e., and still keep their svelte form}

Reply
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
Sep 29, 2017 11:24:24   #
ole sarg Loc: south florida
 
The cameras are great but there are a lot of lousy photographers. Ditto for mega buck cameras!

Reply
Sep 29, 2017 13:47:45   #
kenArchi Loc: Seal Beach, CA
 
Well, that's a good question. I make it as good as I can with it's limitations.
My little P&S has taught me to anticipate my shots. Because it is slow and old Samsung HZ15W, 12mp, 2.3sensor, F3.3-5.8, 24-240 zoom.

Here are 2 sample pictures from this camera at one of the last shows of the famous Barnum & Bailey 3 Ring Circus.
#1 is at 240mm, #2 is at 24mm, #3 is the camera. Setting was program.







Reply
Sep 29, 2017 13:58:13   #
kenArchi Loc: Seal Beach, CA
 
I will replace my Samsung HZ15W with a Canon G7x ll, 20mp, f1.8-2.8(fast lens) 24-100zoom. And the digital zoom is 4x, meaning it will zoom out digitally to 400mm.

As I will repeat, a fast lens f1.8-2.8.

Reply
Sep 29, 2017 14:30:24   #
cambriaman Loc: Central CA Coast
 
I'm happy with my Canon SX-50HS. It's compact, light and has sharp IQ . I often take it when I am not setting our to do some serious image capture with the Nikon D800e and all it's lenses.

Reply
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
Sep 29, 2017 14:46:40   #
74images Loc: Los Angeles, California
 
cambriaman wrote:
I'm happy with my Canon SX-50HS. It's compact, light and has sharp IQ . I often take it when I am not setting our to do some serious image capture with the Nikon D800e and all it's lenses.


The SX50 Don't Fit in Your Shirt Pocket, He's Talking the Pocket Zoom Cameras Like what I Have & Others on the Post & what They Can Do Mainly How Far the Zoom Goes & It's Quality.

74images

Reply
Sep 29, 2017 18:31:21   #
Chris T Loc: from England across the pond to New England
 
74images wrote:
The SX50 Don't Fit in Your Shirt Pocket, He's Talking the Pocket Zoom Cameras Like what I Have & Others on the Post & what They Can Do Mainly How Far the Zoom Goes & It's Quality.

74images


That's true, 74images ... I WAS referring to POCKET-able cameras, and ones like the Canon Powershot series - SX-30IS, SX-40HS (both of which I own) and the follow-up SX-50HS, along with the current SX-60HS - cannot possibly be described as "Pocketable." You need a bag to carry them around, although, a relatively compact one will do. However, these are commonly referred to, as Bridge Cameras, or the slightly older term - Long Zoom Cameras. I see now, from other posts here, people also refer to them as - Superzooms. Most bridge cameras, are almost equal, in every proportion, to the smallest APS-C DSLRs. One or two (Fujis, Panasonics) may even be a little bigger.

The reference here was to do with Pockets - infer shirt pocket, if you will, or - as some indicated - perhaps, pockets in cargo pants. Whatever you think of as "pockets" - the indication is you employ a pocket of your clothing, as a camera bag, thereby not necessitating such a device.

Reply
Sep 29, 2017 18:36:29   #
Chris T Loc: from England across the pond to New England
 
kenArchi wrote:
I will replace my Samsung HZ15W with a Canon G7x ll, 20mp, f1.8-2.8(fast lens) 24-100zoom. And the digital zoom is 4x, meaning it will zoom out digitally to 400mm.

As I will repeat, a fast lens f1.8-2.8.


My goodness, Ken ... that IS fast for a pocketable camera. May I ask you, at what point does your Samsung change from f1.8 to f2.8? Is there an indication on the body, or in the viewfinder, the aperture has shut down a few stops? Is that a variable - like f2, f2.4, etc.?

Reply
Sep 29, 2017 18:42:50   #
Chris T Loc: from England across the pond to New England
 
kenArchi wrote:
I will replace my Samsung HZ15W with a Canon G7x ll, 20mp, f1.8-2.8(fast lens) 24-100zoom. And the digital zoom is 4x, meaning it will zoom out digitally to 400mm.

As I will repeat, a fast lens f1.8-2.8.


BTW, those pics you shared are astonishingly good, for having been produced by such a small device. Those parked Bengals are really sharp. The lion coming towards your shooting position, over the Bengals - not so sharp, but then - he/she was in motion. Is there a way you could have racked up the shutter speed a little for that shot, in order to "freeze" the lion, or is that not possible with that camera?

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.