135-400 with 1.4x on a 4/3 sensor. 1120mm FF equivalent. Used with tripod.
Without digital extension (cropping), it would be 2000mm - Nikon P900 - usually no tripod/monopod but braced on something handy since my 81 year old legs don't seem to balance as well as they once did.
800mm
The most I can do without a tripod is one blurry shot. It never got used without a tripod and never will, at least not by me.
--
150-600 Sigma Sport on a tripod or monopod.
Sigma 150-500mm, tripod most of the time, very heavy and difficult to hand hold.
Canon 500mmF4 with 2x extender on Canon 7dmark2. Used a gimble head on tripod.
800mm mirror lens by hand, 3200mm using car roof as support.
1600 mm telephoto in the 35mm film days; with digital 450mm and 1000 mm.
16.76 meters focal length, f/3.3 fixed aperture, but the downside was the camera had only a 0.000001 megapixel sensor (a 1x1 pixel "array", state of the art for early 1980s infrared digital).
ChrisT wrote:
Was it hand-hold-able, or did it need a tripod?
It was not hand-hold-able, or even on a tripod. In fact, it had a whole observatory built around it: <
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hale_Telescope>.
But nowadays I have to settle for a 900mm, f/7.9 Newtonian reflector on my DSLR, using a tripod.
Panasonic Leica 100-400 mm (200-800 mm ff equivalent with 2x crop factor on my Panasonic Lumix GX8) Takes sharp photos hand-held even at longest focal length. Love it!
3000mm on a DX camera. I used a Kowa spotting scope and focused the 60X eyepiece on the camera sensor using an adapter. All on a tripod, as there is no way to handhold this.
BTW, what is a gimble?
wkocken wrote:
Quote:
Used a gimble head on tripod.
A 150-600mm Tamron G2 mounted on a crop sensor Nikon D500 giving me an "effective focal length of 900mm. Used 50/50 on a monopod with an arca type clamp for the lens, or the whole rig mounted on a Gimbal headed tripod. I find I'm using the monopod more for hummingbirds and butterflies, and the gimballed tripod for larger targets, such as stationary birds, or birds in flight. And this lens, to answer your original question, gives me ALL the reach I need at that 900mmFL, and this lens is also PLENTY sharp at a bargain price!
Native focal length: 800mm; Nikon 400mm f/3.5 IF-ED + Nikon TC-301 2X teleconverter, mounted to a Nikon F4s, on a Manfrotto tripod.
35mm equivalent: 840mm; M.Zuiko 300mm f/4 PRO lens + M.Zuiko 1.4x Teleconverter MC-14 on an Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II (2X crop factor), handheld (the 5-axis In Body Image Stabilization is pretty incredible).
Chris T
Loc: from England across the pond to New England
ptk wrote:
16.76 meters focal length, f/3.3 fixed aperture, but the downside was the camera had only a 0.000001 megapixel sensor (a 1x1 pixel "array", state of the art for early 1980s infrared digital).
It was not hand-hold-able, or even on a tripod. In fact, it had a whole observatory built around it: <
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hale_Telescope>.
But nowadays I have to settle for a 900mm, f/7.9 Newtonian reflector on my DSLR, using a tripod.
16.76 meters focal length, f/3.3 fixed aperture, b... (
show quote)
You win, Ptk !!! .... Pick out your fave kewpie doll!!!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.