Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Non-Nikon Lens Question
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Aug 31, 2017 19:13:37   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
skywolf wrote:
I highly recommend Tamron as yet another alternative. I'll put my Tamrons up against anyone for quality and durability. Sigma and Tokina are good too, though a little more expensive than Tamron, and any of them will go head-to-head with Nikon or Canon lenses.


So, your saying that Tamron lenses are on the same level of sharpness, quality build, and durability as say Zeiss T* lenses.

Reply
Sep 1, 2017 13:33:16   #
weedhook
 
Sorry, I couldn't resist jumping in on this one. Look, anyone who has read Consumer Reports over the years understands that you don't always get what you pay for. Expensive is not always the best, sometimes inexpensive is. I have seen reviews and tests that have trashed specific Canon, Nikon, Tamron, Sigma, Tokina lenses and highly praised other lenses by the same manufacturers. It is entirely possible that a specific Tamron lens would test out comparable to a Zeiss T* lens. It may not be likely, but it is possible.

Reply
Sep 1, 2017 20:55:42   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
weedhook wrote:
Sorry, I couldn't resist jumping in on this one. Look, anyone who has read Consumer Reports over the years understands that you don't always get what you pay for. Expensive is not always the best, sometimes inexpensive is. I have seen reviews and tests that have trashed specific Canon, Nikon, Tamron, Sigma, Tokina lenses and highly praised other lenses by the same manufacturers. It is entirely possible that a specific Tamron lens would test out comparable to a Zeiss T* lens. It may not be likely, but it is possible.
Sorry, I couldn't resist jumping in on this one. L... (show quote)


Many thanks for your come back, I really needed a good laugh today, thanks.

Reply
 
 
Sep 1, 2017 21:44:11   #
Grandpa Pete Loc: Western Finger Lakes (NY)
 
Mondolinni wrote:
Hey Folks,
Looking to purchase an ultra-wide lens for my D500 in the (10-??) range and considering options from Tokina and Sigma since they seem to be at a more affordable price point than Nikons for this type of lens.
Thinking it would be great to have for certain situations, but not "general" use.
All my current glass is Nikon. Can anyone offer some advice or experience on these other two brands I'm lookin at? They both seem to get fairly good reviews.
Thanks for any input
Hey Folks, br Looking to purchase an ultra-wide le... (show quote)

I have the Tokina 12-24 F4 (now made as a 12-28) and it's tack sharp and priced within reason. Had it for about seven years, first on a D90 and now a D7100.

Reply
Sep 1, 2017 22:11:55   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
Two things I don't like about the new Nikon is that it is slow and has a variable aperture.

Either of the Tokinas would be a better choice for me. The 11-16 to save a few $$$ or the 11-20 for more $$$ and a slightly wider range.

--

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.