OK Everyone, this is probably a stupid question but over the years I have never used a camera with "full frame". So what is there a huge difference with a Full Frame camera?
jim10ec wrote:
OK Everyone, this is probably a stupid question but over the years I have never used a camera with "full frame". So what is there a huge difference with a Full Frame camera?
To put it in real simple terms the sensor is larger so there is more in the picture. I'm sure you will have a bunch of posts from college professor wantabes who will write 10,000 word essays explaining it.
Thanks for the warning - although do you feel the additional cost is worth the full frame camera?
jim10ec wrote:
Thanks for the warning - although do you feel the additional cost is worth the full frame camera?
I've only had APS-C camera's so unfortunately I'm not qualified to answer that although my gut feel is that is worth the additional cost if you're a very serious photographer and you're willing to pay the additional expense. I've just haven't got there yet.
Welcome to the forum.
Jack
leftj wrote:
To put it in real simple terms the sensor is larger so there is more in the picture. I'm sure you will have a bunch of posts from college professor wantabes who will write 10,000 word essays explaining it.
First: to jim10ec Welcome to the UHH.
Full Frame = digital sensor aprx the same size as a 35 mm negative.
And yes the cameras and lenses* are more expensive, but have advantages: better low light performance, usually better for cropping if desired and generally better for BIG prints or big screen projection display. I use both FF and APS-C cameras (well really small sensor pocket camera also). Each has its uses and strengths/weaknesses.
Oh, professor/teacher mode - more common is "wannabe" as opposed to "wantabe". I taught in East Los Angeles and had a lot of students who were "wannabe gang bangers".
*The FF lenses work on APS-C cameras also. Many buy them just in case they decide to go FF, don't have to sell all their lenses and start over. All my lenses are FF but I have access to my daughter's APS-C lenses since I bought all of them for her.
Jim, I own the Canon 6D, a full-frame camera, and in my photography, I find it indispensable. I do a lot of low-light work for our church, as well as shooting entertainment groups, also in low light. In addition, I shoot programs for a retired teachers organization, and all of that is done in low light conditions. Finally, I take photos for a dinner club group which meets at night in a restaurant (three guesses!) with the worst lighting of all. I prefer to shoot without flash, as I take a lot of shots in all of these arenas, and a flash would be distracting. For years my ASP-C sensor camera of choice has been a Canon 7D, not noted for its high ISO noise-free performance. I'm planning to update very soon with a Canon EOS 80D, which has much improved high ISO/low light performance; however, still not in a league with my full frame 6D. Bottom line--if you do a lot of low light work without flash, you just can't beat a full frame camera. Good luck!
Another "Jim"
Welcome to UHH Jim, glad you joined us. Post some of your images when you can.
Have fun, learn and enjoy the forum.
Don
Hey Don, my hockey pictures are posted on my web page. Check the link which is posted there
http://www.wknox.net . Also have some of my Germany pictures posted from a couple of years ago at the bottom of my page. Thanks for your reply.
Welcome. I am a Canon man but am not directly familiar with the camera you are asking about. It is out of my price range but sounds like an excellent camera. I shoot with a 5D miii and am very happy with that. Happy shooting.
Thanks Kevin the EOS-1DXMark III is certainly out of my price range also, which is why I am looking at what experiences others have had with it before I make a final decision. I currently use the 7D MII and very happy with it, but just thought it would be neat to try out another camera. I know, kind of goofy, but then that is what keeps this old guy going....! Have a great day Kevin, will let everyone know what my decision is.
jim10ec wrote:
Thanks Kevin the EOS-1DXMark III is certainly out of my price range also, which is why I am looking at what experiences others have had with it before I make a final decision. I currently use the 7D MII and very happy with it, but just thought it would be neat to try out another camera. I know, kind of goofy, but then that is what keeps this old guy going....! Have a great day Kevin, will let everyone know what my decision is.
Thanks Kevin the EOS-1DXMark III is certainly out ... (
show quote)
Jim,
I am going to two photo workshops in the Asheville NC area during back to back weeks this September. One has only one spot open and the other is larger and has several spots open. If you are interested I will private message you the details.
Kevin
leftj wrote:
Web site link does not work.
I just checked the link and it was working for me:
http://www.wknox.net
Welcome! Looking forward to your posts and pictures. Happy shooting!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.