Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
810 cropping vs teleconverter
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Apr 13, 2017 11:56:49   #
redlegfrog
 
Wow! you guys are bringing a whole new argument to the discussion. This is an angle I hadn't thought of.
I would like to hear more about Larger sensors needing faster f-stops to produce sharp images.
show me what you got!

Reply
Apr 13, 2017 11:59:50   #
oldtigger Loc: Roanoke Virginia-USA
 
redlegfrog wrote:
...I would like to hear more about Larger sensors needing faster f-stops to produce sharp images....

Not larger sensors, just higher density sensors, and faster shutters, not larger apertures..

Reply
Apr 13, 2017 12:46:26   #
O2Ra
 
Yes yes yes. There is always give and take. It's not too bad in good light where you can up the shutter speed and keep the ISOs low. Low light is a killer. I shoot live music and with the d80 and a 50mm f/1.4 shot at f/1.4 to f/2.8 for the ISOs I almost want , lol, I keep my shutter speed most of the time at 1/160 or higher. I sometimes can go lower but the situations have to allow me . And with the new Nikkor 70-200 e fl with VR on its 160-250 at f/2.8. Not really liking this lens in even marginal dusk darkness. It hunts and also just plain misses. Where my old 80-200 ads-d hot. That's another story.

Reply
 
 
Apr 13, 2017 13:19:33   #
O2Ra
 
Yes yes yes. There is always give and take. It's not too bad in good light where you can up the shutter speed and keep the ISOs low. Low light is a killer. I shoot live music and with the d80 and a 50mm f/1.4 shot at f/1.4 to f/2.8 for the ISOs I almost want , lol, I keep my shutter speed most of the time at 1/160 or higher. I sometimes can go lower but the situations have to allow me . And with the new Nikkor 70-200 e fl with VR on its 160-250 at f/2.8. Not really liking this lens in even marginal dusk darkness. It hunts and also just plain misses. Where my old 80-200 ads-d hot. That's another story.

Reply
Apr 13, 2017 15:07:37   #
O2Ra
 
Steve Perry wrote:
Sigh...

You have to scroll down and read the entire article. I point out everything you mention and more.


Great article and great job Steve . Thanks for what you do much appreciated. Sincerely much appreciated.

Reply
Apr 13, 2017 16:58:24   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
redlegfrog wrote:
Wow! you guys are bringing a whole new argument to the discussion. This is an angle I hadn't thought of.
I would like to hear more about Larger sensors needing faster f-stops to produce sharp images.
show me what you got!



Reply
Apr 13, 2017 17:04:21   #
oldtigger Loc: Roanoke Virginia-USA
 
redlegfrog wrote:
...I would like to hear more about Larger sensors needing faster f-stops to produce sharp images....

where did you hear something like that?

Reply
 
 
Apr 13, 2017 17:39:01   #
redlegfrog
 
oldtigger wrote:
where did you hear something like that?

From 02Ra and you. see earlier replies

Reply
Apr 13, 2017 17:44:22   #
oldtigger Loc: Roanoke Virginia-USA
 
redlegfrog wrote:
From 02Ra and you. see earlier replies

I believe i said:
"Not larger sensors, just higher density sensors, and faster shutters, not larger apertures.."
"Now with the D810/36mpx, i'm not even sure 1/500 is fast enough."

And i think o2ra said:
"But with higher mp you'll have to shoot at higher shutter speeds to stop the blurring effects you get from that high mega pixel sensor. It even happens with the d810."

No mention of sensor dimensions or aperture.

Reply
Apr 13, 2017 18:51:46   #
catchlight.. Loc: Wisconsin USA- Halden Norway
 
Quote from Canon and an example case on pixels:

"If you have moved from the EOS-1D to the EOS-1D Mark II, you might find that the images look less sharp. There are two reasons for this. First, images captured with the EOS-1D Mark II have less noise than images from the earlier model.

This provides a smoother gradation, which can give the impression of reduced sharpness. Also, the EOS-1D does not have a phase plate. This makes the images look sharper, but can increase the level of false colours. If you want images from the EOS-1D and EOS-1D Mark II to be similar, set the sharpness parameter on the EOS-1D Mark II to ‘1’.

Even after making these changes, images from more recent EOS professional digital cameras can still look softer than those from earlier models. This is because recent models have more pixels, which means that pixel size is smaller (11.5µm on the EOS-1D; 7.2µm on the EOS-1Ds Mark II). Smaller pixels are more sensitive to camera shake, as a smaller movement will cause the image to move across more pixels. You need to hold the camera steadier - ideally on a tripod.

For the same reason, sports photographers also need to re-think their shutter speeds, as blur from subject movement will be more apparent on cameras with more pixels. Where possible, consider increasing the shutter speed, even if this requires an increase in ISO speed".

Reply
Apr 13, 2017 22:29:32   #
O2Ra
 
catchlight.. wrote:
Quote from Canon and an example case on pixels:

"If you have moved from the EOS-1D to the EOS-1D Mark II, you might find that the images look less sharp. There are two reasons for this. First, images captured with the EOS-1D Mark II have less noise than images from the earlier model.

This provides a smoother gradation, which can give the impression of reduced sharpness. Also, the EOS-1D does not have a phase plate. This makes the images look sharper, but can increase the level of false colours. If you want images from the EOS-1D and EOS-1D Mark II to be similar, set the sharpness parameter on the EOS-1D Mark II to ‘1’.

Even after making these changes, images from more recent EOS professional digital cameras can still look softer than those from earlier models. This is because recent models have more pixels, which means that pixel size is smaller (11.5µm on the EOS-1D; 7.2µm on the EOS-1Ds Mark II). Smaller pixels are more sensitive to camera shake, as a smaller movement will cause the image to move across more pixels. You need to hold the camera steadier - ideally on a tripod.

For the same reason, sports photographers also need to re-think their shutter speeds, as blur from subject movement will be more apparent on cameras with more pixels. Where possible, consider increasing the shutter speed, even if this requires an increase in ISO speed".
Quote from Canon and an example case on pixels: br... (show quote)


Yes and one of the reasons say (Nikon) because I know their products , uses 16-21 mp on their sports and action type cameras. And also it allows for more fps and larger buffer capacities.

Reply
 
 
Apr 13, 2017 23:01:24   #
catchlight.. Loc: Wisconsin USA- Halden Norway
 
O2Ra wrote:
Yes and one of the reasons say (Nikon) because I know their products , uses 16-21 mp on their sports and action type cameras. And also it allows for more fps and larger buffer capacities.


for sure that is exactly what it takes in a sports camera...

It's funny how many articles are on the internet that disclaim the notion. I was reading a few very convincing stories today...

The manufacturers will tell you flat out that increased shutter speed is now required for today's higher pixel sensors.


Reply
Apr 18, 2017 15:26:46   #
AmyJ Loc: Maryland
 
Steve Perry wrote:
I did that exact test on several cameras, including the D810.

http://backcountrygallery.com/use-teleconverter-crop-image/

Spoiler alert - use the TC :)




Great article! Thank you for sharing your research.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.