Nice shot, I'd rate it that high or higher.
Erik_H
Loc: Denham Springs, Louisiana
I can see where it would be addictive. It could be used as a good keyword generator (I suck at keywording). My question though, is what they do with the images that you drag to the screen. They now have a copy of them, and could probably turn around and sell them without you knowing about it. Very nice shot by the way.
buckwheat wrote:
... Of course it rated one of mine at 1.1%.
...
I wouldn't feel too bad, it rated one of mine at 0.0%. How does anything get 0.0%? LAF
- See another discussion here
Discuss: Everypixel
I dunno, one of mine got 79%; I kinda liked that. However, the next one got 0.0%; didn't like that. I agree about the keywording aspect.
BHC
Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
Well, it rated one AA at 13%, an HCB at 33% and a professional portrait of Annie Leibovitz (photographer unknown, but she uses it as her primary portrait) at 9%. Granted that third generation of such shots are of inferior quality, I still think the range indicates that the program needs a bit of fine tuning. And no, I didn't try one of my shots; no guts.
Surprisingly, it rated my uploaded image at 99.6%. Although I do quite like the image, I still think the score is a bit too high for it.
My image got a good rating.
It seems to like some of my black and white images. Mark
You think for a minute I will put my toe into that dark purple wavering hole... yikes... That is "self image" suicide!!! well maybe later.... the test is at:
https://everypixel.com/aesthetics
with too much help like this, and apps that tell us what our crying baby needs, the human race will find itself on the endangered species list.
I tried 3, the first was 96.9, second 92.9 and third 89.6
Erik_H
Loc: Denham Springs, Louisiana
fergmark wrote:
easy come easy go.
That's a great image. Maybe it doesn't take composition into account.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.