Boris Ekner wrote:
My thanks to everyone. I have no clue of which is the best one of these free options so I went with Gimp. Looks like its doing what I want. The rest is just a learning curve that I guess I'll manage over time. Thanks again guys, much appreciated! :-)
Good choice.
Free, but hard to learn, although more sites dedicated to the learning curve than one might imagine. Still difficult.
What most people don't know is that over the years, Photoshop and Gimp have run quite parallel. In fact when Photoshop produces new features, they typically get them from GIMP!
Kuzano wrote:
Good choice.
Free, but hard to learn, although more sites dedicated to the learning curve than one might imagine. Still difficult.
What most people don't know is that over the years, Photoshop and Gimp have run quite parallel. In fact when Photoshop produces new features, they typically get them from GIMP!
Does GIMP process 16 bit images yet?
I'm happy with photofiltre.The manual is in French but there is an online users-support group. It is free.
Boris Ekner wrote:
I might be cheap but is there an option to Photoshop?
I just want to paint a portrait background black and it feels kind of stupid to buy a PS subscription, or a complete license, for that one task only.
Affinity Photo (Mac or PC). Luminar (Currently Mac only)
Are you actively using Light Zone? I tried it and liked it a lot; I was able to get better results quickly (on my monitor) with it than other products. When I converted it to a tiff and opened in light room, didn't look so good. I began to think I might be going down a road that might be a dead end since there seems to be little current interest in the product.
I'd be interested in your thoughts on Light Zone....
rmalarz wrote:
GIMP is free, it also includes a big learning curve.
Light Zone is free, includes a learning curve
If you are using a Mac, Phocus is also free, learning curve included.
--Bob
rmalarz wrote:
GIMP is free, it also includes a big learning curve.
Light Zone is free, includes a learning curve
If you are using a Mac, Phocus is also free, learning curve included.
--Bob
Photoshop is not free and also includes a learning curve.
I use GIMP and Lightzone (a program I for which I once paid - developer went under and program was rescued by users - now open source). Lightzone's approach is totally different, but, in one piece of software, you have a RAW converter and a very capable editor. There are versions of GIMP that will handle 16-bit files (8-bit limitation being one of the major beefs of this program's detractors), and, I predict that, one day, GIMP will rule the photo editing world. It's that close in terms of its capabilities. Being free, I think anyone who edits photos and overlooks this program does him/herself a disservice.
IMHO, GIMP gets a bad rap from many PSers for its learning curve only because it interface does not mirror PS. I think GIMP is actually easier to learn than PS unless one is thoroughly trained in PS. I would guess that someone who only knows GIMP would find PS equally difficult to learn.
I've played around with a program called Sagelight which I find also intriguing. I believe the project is now defunct. If you are really into trying different editing software, google the subject and you will find many more choices than those mentioned thus far. All will involve a learning curve, but, for me, learning is part of the fun.
Good luck.
Caruso
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.