Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Need advice on new printer
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Jan 16, 2017 18:40:14   #
rfmaude41 Loc: Lancaster, Texas (DFW area)
 
rleonetti wrote:
Epson WP-960. Makes "real photos" on their premium papers.


So does the XP-960, same inkset, specs, etc. It also scans and copies... Even up to 11 X 17 !!!!!

Reply
Jan 16, 2017 18:52:57   #
Billy Bob
 
I have 10 of these so for I'm go to get two more today. Prints great. Prints 8x5 x 11 has the ink for $30. but refill is $25. when you need it so I BUY OTHER.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/322340010973?_trksid=p2060353.m2749.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT

Reply
Jan 16, 2017 18:56:48   #
Billy Bob
 
READ and make sure it says with ink.

Reply
 
 
Jan 16, 2017 19:04:00   #
bdk Loc: Sanibel Fl.
 
Im using the epson eco Tank it was about $300. so far Ive printed over 100 pages and about 75 8x10 photos and the ink has hardly moved. They say you can get thousands of prints before you have to refill the tanks. There are 4 tanks and INK is $12.49 per tank and then your set for thousands more prints.
The prints are ok, it took a while for me to get it acceptable by that I mean adjusting PS output for that printer. For photos around thehouse and for my friends its great. You want quality prints you'll have to go to a much better printer.

Reply
Jan 16, 2017 19:22:49   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
sister3 wrote:
Good afternoon all !!! I'm looking for some advice on purchasing a new photo printer. Most of what I print are photos even thought I also need a printer that copies, scans, etc. Any advice on what brand and model that will give me quality photo and copies that is not too expensive? Sure would love some advice. Thanks, sister3

On average, the do-it-all-printers (scan, fax, print), are usually not so good at printing photos, they are of much lower quality, compared to printers made for printing photos!!

Reply
Jan 16, 2017 20:00:18   #
SusanFromVermont Loc: Southwest corner of Vermont
 
xiphios wrote:
My experience with the new printer named Epson super color p800 was basically meant to inform our people about the problems involved in purchasing a relatively non-complex instrument such as a printer. The problems arise from a deficiency of ethics in the business world. Epson has shown such deficiency, in my opinion. Let me clarify.

About 28 ml equals an ounce. My statement of 3 to 4 ounces would be more than than the indicated 60 ml per cartridge. I was generous in my critique.
The information dealing with the required Epson cartridge purchase or else! came from the following web site.
http://precisioncolors.com/P800_Ref.html

I must also point out, that in my internet search of the Epson sure color p800, the quality of the plastic construction of this printer was so poor that the person writing the review found the plastic breaks so easily that it was not possible to install the Epson roll paper holder designed for the printer because of plastic breakage!

Please note, that I print 13"x19" archival prints regularly so that ink usage is high and cost a priority. The p800 ink cost raises my the ink cost per print from cents to dollars. The Epson 4800, my old printer, used only 8 colors
and the Epson charge for a set of 8 color in large size cartridges, 220 ml K3 ink was about $1,100. I found non-Epson 220ml cartridges of K3 ink selling for $200-250! Worked equally well as the Epson brand at 1/5th the cost! By doing a brief comparison the Epson ink appears highly over-priced and to maintain sales Epson is resorting to preventing the freedom to use other brands by the photographer if they so desire.

My only intent in communicating my thoughts was to inform our group of the dangers inherent in printer purchase, much as in camera purchase. Although in the case of cameras purchase of film is no longer mandatory, printers do have such a requirement...and a printer manufacturer should not make it mandatory to purchase ink only from that manufacturer.
My experience with the new printer named Epson sup... (show quote)

Thank you for clarifying your previous post! I agree it is important that people understand the dangers inherent in ANY purchase - especially ones of a costly nature. Have you considered returning the P-800? If I spent that much money for something I thought would be good, and discovered otherwise, I certainly would not want to keep it!

Doing the research before purchasing is so important. I always look for information on important items before buying. Manufacturers' websites are a good place to start, but they mostly tell you about how wonderful their product is. Usually more detailed information is available there, but you have to look for it. Reviews found in different places can also be helpful. There are always disgruntled customers with lots of complaints, so you cannot take all that you read at face value. I also like to look for professional reviews - DP Review (but they don't always have what I am looking for), and Red River Paper are two. Red River has always made a point of reviewing and comparing printers and publishing those on their website. Part of their great service for their customers!

So many people write in to ask questions, and it is good to be able to help them. But so often it is obvious they have not done any research on their own, and are relying on other people to provide the answers! This is not a good idea, because others mainly know what THEY like, and no matter how earnestly they attempt to be helpful, it is not so easy when they do not truly know what the other person really wants.

I also would like to print larger at home, and 17x22 capacity is an attractive solution. Not that I would do too many that large, because as you point out, it can get expensive when you add up the cost of the larger paper and the large ink tanks (not to mention the initial investment in the printer...). I generally like 11x14 with a few 16x20 thrown in. Without a printer that will do that, I have to send out for them. The printing company I deal with has regular sales, so unless I am impatient, I just wait for one that gives a hefty discount on what I want! In the meantime, I print 8x10 or smaller!

Reply
Jan 16, 2017 21:29:39   #
foathog Loc: Greensboro, NC
 
I wouldn't buy Epson for just that reason EXPENSIVE INK.



xiphios wrote:
My experience with the new printer named Epson super color p800 was basically meant to inform our people about the problems involved in purchasing a relatively non-complex instrument such as a printer. The problems arise from a deficiency of ethics in the business world. Epson has shown such deficiency, in my opinion. Let me clarify.

About 28 ml equals an ounce. My statement of 3 to 4 ounces would be more than than the indicated 60 ml per cartridge. I was generous in my critique.
The information dealing with the required Epson cartridge purchase or else! came from the following web site.
http://precisioncolors.com/P800_Ref.html

I must also point out, that in my internet search of the Epson sure color p800, the quality of the plastic construction of this printer was so poor that the person writing the review found the plastic breaks so easily that it was not possible to install the Epson roll paper holder designed for the printer because of plastic breakage!

Please note, that I print 13"x19" archival prints regularly so that ink usage is high and cost a priority. The p800 ink cost raises my the ink cost per print from cents to dollars. The Epson 4800, my old printer, used only 8 colors
and the Epson charge for a set of 8 color in large size cartridges, 220 ml K3 ink was about $1,100. I found non-Epson 220ml cartridges of K3 ink selling for $200-250! Worked equally well as the Epson brand at 1/5th the cost! By doing a brief comparison the Epson ink appears highly over-priced and to maintain sales Epson is resorting to preventing the freedom to use other brands by the photographer if they so desire.

My only intent in communicating my thoughts was to inform our group of the dangers inherent in printer purchase, much as in camera purchase. Although in the case of cameras purchase of film is no longer mandatory, printers do have such a requirement...and a printer manufacturer should not make it mandatory to purchase ink only from that manufacturer.
My experience with the new printer named Epson sup... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Jan 16, 2017 22:36:24   #
SusanFromVermont Loc: Southwest corner of Vermont
 
foathog wrote:
I wouldn't buy Epson for just that reason EXPENSIVE INK.

The ink is expensive because you are getting almost 8x the amount as are in the regular size ink tanks. And for what I am paying now for those smaller ones, it is a better price - only 4x the amount. I guess if you don't mind paying more for less... The newer printers from both Epson and Canon that print larger size papers have these larger ink tanks. So you are spending $60 for each one, but you don't have to buy all of them at the same time, and you won't be purchasing them as often.

Reply
Jan 16, 2017 23:16:01   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
SusanFromVermont wrote:
The ink is expensive because you are getting almost 8x the amount as are in the regular size ink tanks. And for what I am paying now for those smaller ones, it is a better price - only 4x the amount. I guess if you don't mind paying more for less... The newer printers from both Epson and Canon that print larger size papers have these larger ink tanks. So you are spending $60 for each one, but you don't have to buy all of them at the same time, and you won't be purchasing them as often.


Well stated.

There is a good reason Epson inks are expensive that isn't related to greed --- They actually make great, archival quality ink. Wilhelm Imaging Research has estimated the life of EPSON prints to be roughly FIVE TIMES the life of silver halide papers. Do the third party ink sellers ever make claims about their light-fastness?

In quantity, Epson inks are less expensive, but you have to deal with a volume dealer.

There is a reason top museums, celebrity photographers, high end graphic service bureaus, ad agencies, in-house creative services departments, and many others use Epsons.

Reply
Jan 17, 2017 05:41:05   #
Delderby Loc: Derby UK
 
burkphoto wrote:
Well stated.
There is a good reason Epson inks are expensive that isn't related to greed --- They actually make great, archival quality ink. Wilhelm Imaging Research has estimated the life of EPSON prints to be roughly FIVE TIMES the life of silver halide papers. Do the third party ink sellers ever make claims about their light-fastness?
In quantity, Epson inks are less expensive, but you have to deal with a volume dealer.
There is a reason top museums, celebrity photographers, high end graphic service bureaus, ad agencies, in-house creative services departments, and many others use Epsons.
Well stated. br There is a good reason Epson inks... (show quote)


Hi Burkphoto - so far no-one has compared the costs of using print companies - or even Cosco, who I understand produce good prints at very cheap prices - I wonder whether you have experience of them? unfortunately I do not. Del.

Reply
Jan 17, 2017 13:03:28   #
SusanFromVermont Loc: Southwest corner of Vermont
 
burkphoto wrote:
Well stated.

There is a good reason Epson inks are expensive that isn't related to greed --- They actually make great, archival quality ink. Wilhelm Imaging Research has estimated the life of EPSON prints to be roughly FIVE TIMES the life of silver halide papers. Do the third party ink sellers ever make claims about their light-fastness?

In quantity, Epson inks are less expensive, but you have to deal with a volume dealer.

There is a reason top museums, celebrity photographers, high end graphic service bureaus, ad agencies, in-house creative services departments, and many others use Epsons.
Well stated. br br There is a good reason Epson i... (show quote)

Thank you. The pigment inks are touted as better for picture life as well as great color. What do you think about Canon in regard to quality of printers and ink? Reason I ask is to help in making a choice between the Epson P800 and the Canon PRO-1000. Both print 17x22, both use pigment inks, their inks are the same price, and both are supposed to be good printers. In addition, I do not know where Epson's customer service is based, but Canon's is in the US, which makes it SO much easier to communicate with them.

As for a volume dealer, I have no idea where to find one. Also, I suspect that quantity might mean more than one full set of ink tanks. That would mean a much larger investment than I am prepared for! Still, it would be good to know how it works to deal with a volume dealer.

Susan

Reply
 
 
Jan 17, 2017 14:21:18   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
SusanFromVermont wrote:
Thank you. The pigment inks are touted as better for picture life as well as great color. What do you think about Canon in regard to quality of printers and ink? Reason I ask is to help in making a choice between the Epson P800 and the Canon PRO-1000. Both print 17x22, both use pigment inks, their inks are the same price, and both are supposed to be good printers. In addition, I do not know where Epson's customer service is based, but Canon's is in the US, which makes it SO much easier to communicate with them.

As for a volume dealer, I have no idea where to find one. Also, I suspect that quantity might mean more than one full set of ink tanks. That would mean a much larger investment than I am prepared for! Still, it would be good to know how it works to deal with a volume dealer.

Susan
Thank you. The pigment inks are touted as better ... (show quote)

Susan,

You won't be able to solve the Canon vs Epson quality question. The printers you reference are so good, you can flip a coin.

For a "volume" dealer, I use B&H. For my Canon printer I keep one of each color in reserve on the shelf. In practice, I could do less. If I get the "low ink" warning, shipping is fast enough that I would probably not get the "out of ink" alarm.

With B&H, I prefer to get "expedited" shipping since they are in New York and I'm in Washington State. To do that, you spend $50. If I have to, I will order and extra ink tank or some other needed item.

B&H, and their New York high volume competitors, do not charge sales tax. If for some reason I was in desperate need of an ink tank, another "high volume" source is Amazon who can get it to me a little quicker. However, they charge sales tax of nearly 10% where I live.

Reply
Jan 17, 2017 14:30:58   #
jmcgloth Loc: Ocean Park, WA
 
cheineck wrote:
Epson. Epson. Epson. Epson.



Reply
Jan 17, 2017 15:59:08   #
SusanFromVermont Loc: Southwest corner of Vermont
 
bsprague wrote:
Susan,

You won't be able to solve the Canon vs Epson quality question. The printers you reference are so good, you can flip a coin.

For a "volume" dealer, I use B&H. For my Canon printer I keep one of each color in reserve on the shelf. In practice, I could do less. If I get the "low ink" warning, shipping is fast enough that I would probably not get the "out of ink" alarm.

With B&H, I prefer to get "expedited" shipping since they are in New York and I'm in Washington State. To do that, you spend $50. If I have to, I will order and extra ink tank or some other needed item.

B&H, and their New York high volume competitors, do not charge sales tax. If for some reason I was in desperate need of an ink tank, another "high volume" source is Amazon who can get it to me a little quicker. However, they charge sales tax of nearly 10% where I live.
Susan, br br You won't be able to solve the Canon... (show quote)

bsprague, it is kind of like the camera issue - Canon vs Nikon...

Ordering one ink tank should cover that $50 minimum! It definitely takes more time with regular shipping over large distances. Living in Vermont, I can generally get my order within 2 days. Very fast. From other places, not so fast!

The "no sales tax" phenomenon will undoubtedly be ending soon. More and more online vendors are starting to change that policy. I believe they will resist as long as possible, partly because it decreases their market share, and partly because it is more book-work for them! But each state has to decide whether to force the issue - they are losing sales tax revenue, but may not want to put a small business in a precarious position.

Reply
Jan 17, 2017 16:43:16   #
Mundj Loc: Richmond TX
 
Just checked the Epson USA site. Their P800 Printer Service Center has a 562 area code which is located in East LA.

SusanFromVermont wrote:
Thank you. The pigment inks are touted as better for picture life as well as great color. What do you think about Canon in regard to quality of printers and ink? Reason I ask is to help in making a choice between the Epson P800 and the Canon PRO-1000. Both print 17x22, both use pigment inks, their inks are the same price, and both are supposed to be good printers. In addition, I do not know where Epson's customer service is based, but Canon's is in the US, which makes it SO much easier to communicate with them.

As for a volume dealer, I have no idea where to find one. Also, I suspect that quantity might mean more than one full set of ink tanks. That would mean a much larger investment than I am prepared for! Still, it would be good to know how it works to deal with a volume dealer.

Susan
Thank you. The pigment inks are touted as better ... (show quote)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.