Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon or Canon
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
Dec 10, 2016 18:40:30   #
Reinaldokool Loc: San Rafael, CA
 
boomer826 wrote:
Nikon products cost more ,because they are a better product !! Take that from a Nikonian (LOL) !!



Reply
Dec 10, 2016 21:47:20   #
Marionsho Loc: Kansas
 
revhen wrote:
A proposal: Why don't we UHHers band together and buy both Nikon and Canon, merge the best of both lines, and end this interminable discussion?

A proposal: Why don't we UHHers band together and... (show quote)


I'll add my dollar two twenty nine plus tax.

Reply
Dec 10, 2016 21:59:40   #
cpkeith
 
If I had to do it over again, I would have bought the Nikon d500, Nikon's pro crop sensor. Absolutely lightening focus, 10 frames per second, and superb low light capability. I currently shoot with a D810 and D7100. Of course it is all about the ergonomics so rent each camera and lens for a day. It's worth the cost given the investment.

Reply
 
 
Dec 11, 2016 04:22:46   #
katawny
 
Both Canon 5d 3 and 4 are great, however, I wouldn't dismiss the Canon 7D mark 2 !!

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 08:34:06   #
pyroManiac Loc: HIXSON,TN
 
If you used an RB67 you should be happy with ANYTHING.

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 18:20:34   #
pyroManiac Loc: HIXSON,TN
 
Photowise I do not think you could detect a difference, however I have found Nikons to be very reliable, not so with Canon going back to the AE 1.

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 19:07:25   #
Jim Bob
 
selwyntdavid wrote:
Hi: I'm new here and new to photography as well. I have been using Nikon D7000 for some time and want to switch/upgrade to Canon thinking of 5DIV or III. I recently went with my friend to do some photography of birds and I really liked his Canon 5DSR and I felt that Canon was more user friendly. Your suggestions will be very help full.


You've already made up your mind and are looking for someone to hold your hand. I pass.

Reply
 
 
Dec 11, 2016 19:41:20   #
jakerite Loc: Truth or Consequences NM
 
No need to be rude, Jim Bob

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 20:01:19   #
Jim Bob
 
jakerite wrote:
No need to be rude, Jim Bob


You call that rude? Geesus, I guess your parents must be Puritans.

Reply
Dec 11, 2016 20:06:59   #
Marionsho Loc: Kansas
 
Jim Bob wrote:
You call that rude? Geesus, I guess your parents must be Puritans.



Reply
Dec 11, 2016 20:50:51   #
boomer826 Loc: Florida gulf coast
 
jakerite wrote:
No need to be rude, Jim Bob


I would second your statement, but I am on the trolls ignore list. Seems if you criticize him, that's how he deals with it .

Reply
 
 
Dec 11, 2016 23:45:09   #
FIMS
 
When you buy into a camera you buy into a system. Cameras you change good lenses you keep and are expensive, so do your research well for once you start buying lenses and accessories you get tied down to a system. Both brands are good, I own Nikon but you are right Cannon does have better ergonomics in some areas. It has been my experience that the Nikon Service department is lacking I sent a lens for repair and got it back just before a big trip to Asia, I am in tears over some of my images using this lens. My equivalent Sigma was much better and Sigma also makes lenses for Canon. Do not think that you have to buy the manufactures lens.

Reply
Dec 13, 2016 11:33:12   #
Dun1 Loc: Atlanta, GA
 
One helpful suggestion, after you narrow your choices, go to a camera store and take the models in you hands and see how each model feels in your hands, if is hard to get that feeling from a website, getting them in your hands and being able to scroll thru the menus to see which one has the better feeling to you

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.