Keenan Loc: Central Coast California

Again, attempts to blame others for your own behavior, misdirection, evasion....what else is new?

robertjerl Loc: Corona, California

Nothing, I am just copying your tactics.
However "There you go again!"

The longer we can keep you tied up on the keyboard the less time you will spend out in the public. We do it long enough and your state might give us a medal for public service and improving the other residents lives.

However I have to go to the store and run some other errands.

Keenan Loc: Central Coast California

Keenan wrote:
"Again, attempts to blame others for your own behavior, misdirection, evasion....what else is new?"


Are you a right winger, by chance? You sure remind me of one, Robert. You have certainly memorized the "mommy, he did it first!" war cry of the right wing manchildren.

Cykdelic Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM

As usual, your wrong, a revisionist, etc. Come on, man! You tried a revisionist attempt at your post and you got called in it.

Cowgirl up and move on, Keenan. You lose.

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

You are mistaken. It is not a fetish for guns that keeps us going but a longing and a demand for Freedom.

Dennis

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

As usual you are totally wrong in your thoughts and in your facts. I own or have owned numerous types of hunting rifles. The only ones I know of that are limited to 3 shots are rifles used for African game or large game in America. The cartridges have a larger diameter than the usual hunting calibers such as 30-06, 270 or 257 Roberts. The larger calibers that might have a 3 shot magazine, but not necessarily, would be .338 Winchester Magnum, 416 Rigby or Weatherby, 505 Gibbs etc. Almost all rifles that shoot the first group of calibers mentioned have a 5 shot magazine. Even the older Winchester lever action rifles such as the 1892, 1894 or even the 1886 carry more than 3 cartridges in their tubular magazines. The original Henry rifle which evolved into other Winchester Lever action rifles was a 44 caliber which held sixteen cartridges, similar to the 20 round magazine of modern rifles.

The main reason that Whitman killed so few people is that there were only a few people that day. The M1 Carbine he used came with a 15 or 30 round magazine. The Remington Model 700 in 6mm Remington which holds 5 in the magazine and 1 in the chamber making it a 6 shot.

Please get your facts straight.

Dennis

dljen Loc: Central PA

I sure hope you guys will give women the same freedom, the freedom of choice.

Cykdelic Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM

Donna,

That's a nice platitude, but I would encourage the normal left (I hope that includes you) to not isolate on the furthest right. It is my observation that out here, in Wisconsin, and in New Mexico, there are very few people who want to actively eliminate "abortion". However, I would say that close to everyone I know in the three places, including Dems and GOP, are dead set against late term abortions and most are against publicly funded abortions.

In other words, choice is there TO A POINT. I, for one, can't figure out why that's not good enough for,us all to move on outside of political division. I fact, how about our elected idiots get together and set the definition above for abortion and as a trade off get the backround checks and a reasonable "no fly" procedure????

hondo812 Loc: Massachusetts

Of course we do Donna. You are free to choose to exercise your 2nd amendment rights and you are free to choose to abstain from exercising them. I might add that this applies to all citizens regardless of gender, race, religion, income level, or pretty much any other demographic indicator.

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

The freedom of choice to do what Donna? Can you be specific please? What is it that women can not do these days if they want to?

Dennis

dljen Loc: Central PA

The freedom to decide what women want to do with reproductive rights. Republican men want to always regulate women...they haven't learned it's not their business.

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

As I recall the SCOTUS has already ruled in favor of the right of women to do what they want with their body. My question to you is who speaks out on behalf of the rights of unborn babies? There are already some people, Liberals, who believe that if a woman gives birth to a baby girl and she REALLY wanted a boy then it is OK to end the life of the girl. I think but am not positive that this is already being done in China. I have seen on a television documentary that some babies, after being aborted, are still alive and would survive if cared for. They are then killed. Is that what you want?

It seems that our society is getting more and more permissive in that these days a woman can have indiscriminate sex knowing that there are no consequences for her actions. She doesn't have to worry about birth control at all, just have fun and if pregnant then abortion is the answer. Even knowing that a woman's rights are the normal now, is there no moral value in trying not to get pregnant to begin with? Or is morality only for the Conservatives among us?

Dennis

Cykdelic Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM

You use such inclusive phrases that do little more than to define the narrowness of your thought. Firs, why should you give a fcuk what a republican guy thinks? Why limit it to guys? Why limit it to republicans? Have you seen the recent nationwide polls on the issue?

Having said that, there is virtually NO chance of the right to abortion going away. There IS, hopefully, a chance late term abortions will become illegal w/ exceptions.

Now, Donna, are you on of those psychos that believes a person has a right to abortion at any time they deem they want one, even partial birth abortions, for any reason? Do you actually think these type of abortions are NOT murdr? All just because they/you are a woman???????

dljen Loc: Central PA

There would be NO babies if the woman wouldn't carry it. It's the woman's right to choose and they will do it legally or illegally, just as you will do with your guns. Though, of course, it shouldn't be that way. A fetus has NO rights. A born child has rights.

dljen Loc: Central PA

Republican lawmakers are very confused with women's reproduction rights. No abortions are not murder, of course not. Why do you feel you should regulate women's bodies? Isn't your party against regulation?