Lets ban white Christians
Jun 16, 2016 12:51:54 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
Croce wrote:
"Ever wonder how the bible retained an audience of believers for thousands of years."
Of course. By trying to scare the living shit out of them. Not from the cradle to the grave, but indeed from the erection to the resurection! The resurection incidentally is fantasy.
Of course. By trying to scare the living shit out of them. Not from the cradle to the grave, but indeed from the erection to the resurection! The resurection incidentally is fantasy.
Not a single person has ever become a born again Christian believer due to fear...always for the love of God......by the way, prove the resurrection is fantasy.
Jun 16, 2016 12:52:42 #
richard-sports wrote:
So, after Newtown, Aurora, Charleston, Oklahoma City, Atlanta Olympics and all the other mass shootings and bombings by white Christian men, would the crazed orange idiot have banned white Christians from entering the USA?
You make a truly stupid statement.
I do NOT recall all those nuts claiming they were doing it in the name of a specific religion, for a specific leader (no one screamed "Viva la Pope! In the name of Catholicism I kill these 49 citizens of the U.S.!")
I am also unaware of an I stitutionalized series of schools in the U.S. Teaching the young to not only hate all not of their religion, but that they need to be converted or put to death.
But wait, there's more! I've yet to see throngs of stupefied Catholics chanting their allegiance to the death of other religions as they ceremoniously cut off the heads of people from those other religions, or drowning them en masse in metal cages, etc.
But if you order now, I will add that I am not aware of any organized Christian attacks egged on by Christian leaders that include random, vicious attacks and murders on restaurants, clubs, schools, train stations, etc.
Oh, let me add that when someone has tried to pull this shit, the Christian leaders have condemned the acts and assisted in the policing of those responsible.
Jun 16, 2016 13:43:11 #
Croce
Loc: Earth
Cykdelic wrote:
You make a truly stupid statement. br br I do NO... (show quote)
You may have something worthwhile to say but unless you take the time to proof read your posts before hitting send I cannot clearly determine your point.
Also there is an edit button so you can go back and correct your original errors.
Jun 16, 2016 13:59:01 #
[quote=Croce]You may have something worthwhile to say but unless you take the time to proof read your posts before hitting send I cannot clearly determine your point.
Also there is an edit button so you can go back and correct your original errors.[/quote
Between autocorrect and typing on a small phone screen, I think I do okay. I'm still on the phone, but having a tissy fit over "instututionalized" dropping an "n" and some random caps from autocorrect seems pretty minor and doesn't warp the point at all.
If is offends your sensitivities, then go to a safe place and ponder it.
Also there is an edit button so you can go back and correct your original errors.[/quote
Between autocorrect and typing on a small phone screen, I think I do okay. I'm still on the phone, but having a tissy fit over "instututionalized" dropping an "n" and some random caps from autocorrect seems pretty minor and doesn't warp the point at all.
If is offends your sensitivities, then go to a safe place and ponder it.
Jun 16, 2016 14:03:58 #
travelwp wrote:
the ADMIN must be a woman, then. No guy would ban you with those ta-ta's.
Jun 16, 2016 14:05:06 #
Croce wrote:
You may have something worthwhile to say but unless you take the time to proof read your posts before hitting send I cannot clearly determine your point.
Also there is an edit button so you can go back and correct your original errors.
Also there is an edit button so you can go back and correct your original errors.
Point seemed clear to me. Yes, a coupla typos, so what ...
If criticizing typos is your thesis, you ain't got much to say.
Jun 16, 2016 14:12:22 #
Croce wrote:
"Ever wonder how the bible retained an audience of believers for thousands of years."
Of course. By trying to scare the living shit out of them. Not from the cradle to the grave, but indeed from the erection to the resurection! The resurection incidentally is fantasy.
Of course. By trying to scare the living shit out of them. Not from the cradle to the grave, but indeed from the erection to the resurection! The resurection incidentally is fantasy.
Please note the spelling, oh sensitive one:
"res·ur·rec·tion - noun - the action or fact of resurrecting or being resurrected. (in Christian belief) Christ's rising from the dead."
Perhaps if you proof read your posts we could get your point 😄
Jun 16, 2016 14:30:53 #
richard-sports wrote:
So, after Newtown, Aurora, Charleston, Oklahoma City, Atlanta Olympics and all the other mass shootings and bombings by white Christian men, would the crazed orange idiot have banned white Christians from entering the USA?
I know a jewish used car salesman who's ass I would enjoy kicking right up between his ears.
Jun 16, 2016 15:33:26 #
Jun 16, 2016 15:52:21 #
dave sproul wrote:
After working through this thread -- why don't we ban stupid?
The whole premise of the post is stupid. But then we have come to expect that from this guy!
Jun 16, 2016 15:57:17 #
Croce
Loc: Earth
[quote=Cykdelic][quote=Croce]You may have something worthwhile to say but unless you take the time to proof read your posts before hitting send I cannot clearly determine your point.
Also there is an edit button so you can go back and correct your original errors.[/quote
Between autocorrect and typing on a small phone screen, I think I do okay. I'm still on the phone, but having a tissy fit over "instututionalized" dropping an "n" and some random caps from autocorrect seems pretty minor and doesn't warp the point at all.
If is offends your sensitivities, then go to a safe place and ponder it.[/quote]
Doesn't offend me at all. I just will not bother with your posts if I see gobble de gook in them. Sorry I twisted your diaper.
Also there is an edit button so you can go back and correct your original errors.[/quote
Between autocorrect and typing on a small phone screen, I think I do okay. I'm still on the phone, but having a tissy fit over "instututionalized" dropping an "n" and some random caps from autocorrect seems pretty minor and doesn't warp the point at all.
If is offends your sensitivities, then go to a safe place and ponder it.[/quote]
Doesn't offend me at all. I just will not bother with your posts if I see gobble de gook in them. Sorry I twisted your diaper.
Jun 16, 2016 16:11:39 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
Croce wrote:
Doesn't offend me at all. I just will not bother with your posts if I see gobble de gook in them. Sorry I twisted your diaper.
That's funny coming from somebody that misspelled Resurrection. lol
Jun 16, 2016 16:29:14 #
Croce wrote:
Doesn't offend me at all. I just will not bother with your posts if I see gobble de gook in them. Sorry I twisted your diaper.
Please note your own goobly gook, incorrect spellings, lack of proof reading, etc., which I already documented for you, Einstein.
Glass houses and all that...........
Jun 16, 2016 17:25:53 #
Croce wrote:
"Ever wonder how the bible retained an audience of believers for thousands of years."
Of course. By trying to scare the living shit out of them. Not from the cradle to the grave, but indeed from the erection to the resurection! The resurection incidentally is fantasy.
Of course. By trying to scare the living shit out of them. Not from the cradle to the grave, but indeed from the erection to the resurection! The resurection incidentally is fantasy.
Hey, man, where ya been? One of my favorite UHH non-believers.
Jun 16, 2016 17:29:44 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.