Well said.
sjb3 wrote:
There's creativity, and there's creativity; it's all in the eye of the beholder. What I've noticed here is that there is a huge amount of technical know-how about photography in general, gained through long years of experience. Those pictures of birds, landscapes, sunsets, etc. are all very well (and for many) beautifully composed, exposed and rendered. Again, it's because there's a lot of Old Geezers (like me; I'm 67 in 3 months) doing something they truly enjoy, and have for a long time, and it shows in the photos I'm seeing here. If our stuff isn't exciting all the hipsters, so what? They should take a closer look and learn something well worth learning. Myself, I have to admit to being somewhat intimidated here. I was hit, early on in my exploring UHH, just how little I actually know about photography, both the techniques and (especially!) the equipment. But this is a swell place to hang out and pick up valuable info, so here I am. If I have any ability, what little there is revolves around retouching. Perhaps some of you may have visited the Library of Congress photo collections? They're extensive and unfortunately in pretty rough shape, too. Most of them are glass-plate negatives well over a hundred years old, with a hundred years worth of scratches, fingerprints, dust and emulsion stains built in (and high-res scanned into the library as is). The photo I'll be attaching was taken in 1913, and looked every day of it. I offer it as a sample of an area of photography that I enjoy, and as a tribute to all old soldiers everywhere as we approach Memorial Day, 2016. I guess maybe from here I ought to head over to the Introduction page and properly ID myself. I did want to let Idahomike and others who may think UHH is somehow lacking in "style", "artistry", "creativity" or whatever: It's there, in spades. Just take a closer look.
There's creativity, and there's creativity; it's a... (
show quote)