I keep my right hand on the camera for BBF and shutter, and for any shutter speed or aperture changed
James R wrote:
""-is it too ominous looking?""
NAW....
Looks Nothing as "ominous" as mine :-)
(You might wish to add a remote wire button where your index finger would make contact on the wood.)
mrcool wrote:
Anybody using a Rifle type stock for the 150-600mm lenses. Looking for suggestions and recommendations.
Here is my version - a "crutch stock" - I was using this sparingly until I perfected my "bodypod" and now, do not use it as much .........
Regis
Loc: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
James R wrote:
As I mention earlier... I do have a rifle stock I use from time to time as when tracking eagle and other birds in flight....
NO! I do NOT take it out when in the city (Saint Louis, Missouri here)
I call it the "Remington Support System".....
It looks great. I would be concerned about the weight and portability.
Regis wrote:
It looks great. I would be concerned about the weight and portability.
++++++++++++++
HiYa, Regis :-)
Well.... I'll tell Ya.....
That guitar strap goes over the ( my ) shoulder and the butt of the stock is Up.... And lens is pointed Down. This makes for easier carrying - especially when I have another camera around my neck ( another 5D Mark II with a 24 - 105 on it ). Also - That strap is "wrapped" around my left arm when sighting in and shooting for best stability....
I should get a photo of these positions - rather than try to explain with writing.
Works good for me.
Reminder.....
Do Not Use This In City Environments. In Colorado, Utah, Arizona, and a few other western States this is never questioned.
James R wrote:
As I mention earlier... I do have a rifle stock I use from time to time as when tracking eagle and other birds in flight....
NO! I do NOT take it out when in the city (Saint Louis, Missouri here)
I call it the "Remington Support System".....
I would thing that puts a lot of strain on the lens mount. I suggest using the tripod mount on the lens and attaching it to the forestock.
James R wrote:
++++++++++++
Very Nice work here... Good design - and comfortable looking as well.
Thank you. It's very easy to use. This was my second design, adding the horn on the right to fit in the armpit to counterbalance the weight of the lens.
Brian in Whitby wrote:
I would thing that puts a lot of strain on the lens mount. I suggest using the tripod mount on the lens and attaching it to the forestock.
-----------------------------------------------------------
LOOK closer....
There is a Manfoto Quick Disconnect mounted on the stock.
There is no more strain on this then when it is on a tripod.
No! I do not have a college education. I am a retired electrical lineman. (( I sometimes teach at three colleges in the STL MO Area - "on call". ))
Tom47
Loc: Gettysburg, PA
I have one somewhere that I built. Haven't used it for years.
James R wrote:
-----------------------------------------------------------
LOOK closer....
There is a Manfoto Quick Disconnect mounted on the stock.
There is no more strain on this then when it is on a tripod.
No! I do not have a college education. I am a retired electrical lineman. (( I sometimes teach at three colleges in the STL MO Area - "on call". ))
I sm sorry,
I was viewing it on my tablet and it appeared to me that the camera was mounted to the stock not the lens.
On looking closercas you suggested, I saw my error.
James R wrote:
-----------------------------------------------------------
LOOK closer....
There is a Manfoto Quick Disconnect mounted on the stock.
There is no more strain on this then when it is on a tripod.
No! I do not have a college education. I am a retired electrical lineman. (( I sometimes teach at three colleges in the STL MO Area - "on call". ))
I sm sorry,
I was viewing it on my tablet and it appeared to me that the camera was mounted to the stock not the lens.
On looking closer as you suggested, I saw my error.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.