Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Lens Opinion
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
Feb 22, 2016 13:14:04   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
GrandmaG wrote:
We just went to a fancy wedding at the Motor City Casino and they passed around 3 phones on selfie sticks so the guests could do a small video of themselves talking to the bride & groom (advice, congratulations, etc.). Modern version of the disposable camera on each table.

Personally, I think it would be a big mistake for a pro to request that no one else is allowed a camera.
And it is going completely against the current culture - sort of like showing up a generation ago at a formal wedding wearing shorts and a Hawaiian shirt

GrandmaG wrote:
Sometimes even the pros don't get all the shots. When our oldest son got married, they had 2 flower girls and one ring bearer. The ring bearer and one of the flower girls were brother & sister but the pro failed to get any pictures of them together...but I did (and all the family wanted that picture). I know he was concentrating on the bride and groom, but honestly, the kids stole the show (they were 4 & 6) and the bride & groom didn't mind because the niece & nephew were so dang cute!
Sometimes even the pros don't get all the shots. W... (show quote)
Then, there was my idiot cousin who forgot to tell the pro she hired that she had family beyond her parents and brother. Our grandmother was really really hurt (I heard all about it because we drove her and my parents from the wedding near Dayton OH to the bus station in Indianapolis IN). She was mollified only when I reminded her that I had taken a number of pictures featuring her (and the next time I visited I could show her the slides).

Reply
Feb 22, 2016 13:39:26   #
Zone-System-Grandpa Loc: Springfield, Ohio
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
I am not a pro, and am not offended. I also understand your reasons for shooting the weddings that you reference.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

So, why didn't state this in your first reply to her ?

Oh, by the way, backpedaling doesn't suit you !

As for the OP's question, the answer is yes to her question about getting a zoom lens as having one will eliminate the need to have to keep changing lenses. Sigma makes some good ones, but often are heavier than others..

Reply
Feb 22, 2016 14:41:21   #
GrandmaG Loc: Flat Rock, MI
 
rehess wrote:
Then, there was my idiot cousin who forgot to tell the pro she hired that she had family beyond her parents and brother. Our grandmother was really really hurt (I heard all about it because we drove her and my parents from the wedding near Dayton OH to the bus station in Indianapolis IN). She was mollified only when I reminded her that I had taken a number of pictures featuring her (and the next time I visited I could show her the slides).


The wedding invitation actually stated that formal attire was requested! Funny you should mention Hawaiian shirts because our oldest son said he was going to wear shorts and an Hawaiian shirt just to mess with his nephew that was getting married. And the Pro only took formal pictures of the bride & groom & wedding party...no family included except the parents. I am a step-grandmother to the groom so I wasn't included at all...which is OK. The "real" grandmothers were walked to their seats for the wedding. The thing is, we drove all the way from Florida for the wedding and we could have just sent a check!!! That's what they wanted.

Reply
 
 
Feb 22, 2016 14:45:28   #
orrie smith Loc: Kansas
 
orriebarber wrote:
I had the Tamron 18-270mm. Traded it for the Tamron 16--300mm. You gain at both ends and with the 16-300mm you can use the manual focus ring while in auto focus. Very pleased with this lens. I also did a wedding for a friend who was a little shot of cash and the pictures came out great.


your name is orrie? I have only known two in my life, my father and my grandfather

Reply
Feb 22, 2016 21:59:32   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
Lesson from experience.
GrandmaG wrote:
We just went to a fancy wedding at the Motor City Casino and they passed around 3 phones on selfie sticks so the guests could do a small video of themselves talking to the bride & groom (advice, congratulations, etc.). Modern version of the disposable camera on each table.

Personally, I think it would be a big mistake for a pro to request that no one else is allowed a camera. Sometimes even the pros don't get all the shots. When our oldest son got married, they had 2 flower girls and one ring bearer. The ring bearer and one of the flower girls were brother & sister but the pro failed to get any pictures of them together...but I did (and all the family wanted that picture). I know he was concentrating on the bride and groom, but honestly, the kids stole the show (they were 4 & 6) and the bride & groom didn't mind because the niece & nephew were so dang cute!
We just went to a fancy wedding at the Motor City ... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 23, 2016 00:36:00   #
washy Loc: Dorset UK
 
Opal wrote:
I was wondering if anyone has used the Tamron AF 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 VC PZD All-In-One Zoom Lens for Nikon DSLR Cameras ... I Have a Nikon D3000. I shoot for fun but have also been helping a few people out with Senior Pictures and the occasional low budget wedding .. I typically do not charge I just like to do it and hey I can help someone who can't afford a "real professional" ... Anyway I am looking for something that is affordable so I am not having to switch my lens so much ... What are your thoughts??

I was also looking at the Sigma 18-250mm f3.5-6.3 DC MACRO OS HSM for Nikon
I was wondering if anyone has used the Tamron AF 1... (show quote)


I had the Tamron 18-270 3.5-6.3 , at times I thought the lens worked well and I managed some good results with it, very sharp, lots of detail etc and other times I thought it was not so good. I used it for shooting some landscapes at F11 and it performed well, with low shutter speeds on a tripod but hand held at 6.3 for other subjects and faster shutter speeds it appeared to work not so well. For a lightweight travel lens it was very good. It was used on various Canon bodies. Hope this helps. Washy

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.