Your favorite landscape lens.
gvarner wrote:
Was wondering what you all favor as a lens for landscapes. I heard so much about wide wide angles that I got one, a Sigma 10-20 f3.5 for my D7000. I am duly impressed after just a few shots of our indoor Christmas displays and a wide expanse of ocean scenery. The perspective is amazing. It covers most of what I consider my "periferal view". My walk around lens is an 18-200 but I now realize that it sort of limits my subject choices to things at a distance. Kind of like visualizing through blinders. Thanks for your thoughts.
Was wondering what you all favor as a lens for lan... (
show quote)
Inasmuch as I love landscape photography, I have made images with a variety of wide-angle lenses on several formats, including 6x7 film, 645 film, full-frame digital and film, aps-c digital, and a few others, including a swing-lens widelux 35mm camera. My most memorable wide-angle lens experience was with a Carl Zeiss 15mm f/2.8 mounted on a Nikon D800e, an outfit that I rented for a trip to Yosemite one winter. Since a lens is a long-term investment, if you're going to spend "real" money, you might consider renting a lens or two for experimentation or for a special occasion.
davidrb
Loc: Half way there on the 45th Parallel
Dave Johnson wrote:
I'm really starting to like my Canon 11-24. It's a spectacular lens.
Was able to use this lens for a day while at a workshop Canon held in Yellowstone. I share your assessment. I can only imagine landscapes with this lens and a new 5 series body. Have you posted any shots on this board?
davidrb wrote:
Was able to use this lens for a day while at a workshop Canon held in Yellowstone. I share your assessment. I can only imagine landscapes with this lens and a new 5 series body. Have you posted any shots on this board?
No, I'm afraid not. I'm an over the road truck driver and home time is at a premium. I haven't had much time to shoot photos much less process them but here is a shot from the back yard.
davidrb
Loc: Half way there on the 45th Parallel
gvarner wrote:
Was wondering what you all favor as a lens for landscapes. I heard so much about wide wide angles that I got one, a Sigma 10-20 f3.5 for my D7000. I am duly impressed after just a few shots of our indoor Christmas displays and a wide expanse of ocean scenery. The perspective is amazing. It covers most of what I consider my "periferal view". My walk around lens is an 18-200 but I now realize that it sort of limits my subject choices to things at a distance. Kind of like visualizing through blinders. Thanks for your thoughts.
Was wondering what you all favor as a lens for lan... (
show quote)
The numbers of your lens make it sound very interesting for landscapes. You will learn that the lens is dependent upon the landscape. Some use a philosophy of the "closer, the wider." In other words if you are using a subject immediately in front of you the lens needs to be wider than if the subject is further away. Make landscapes so expansive.
phlash46
Loc: Westchester County, New York
gvarner wrote:
Was wondering what you all favor as a lens for landscapes. I heard so much about wide wide angles that I got one, a Sigma 10-20 f3.5 for my D7000. I am duly impressed after just a few shots of our indoor Christmas displays and a wide expanse of ocean scenery. The perspective is amazing. It covers most of what I consider my "periferal view". My walk around lens is an 18-200 but I now realize that it sort of limits my subject choices to things at a distance. Kind of like visualizing through blinders. Thanks for your thoughts.
Was wondering what you all favor as a lens for lan... (
show quote)
That Sigma is a really good lens, especially for the price!
I have a 10-20 but always reach for my Sigma 8-16
Stan
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.