Eagle photo preferences
Dec 30, 2015 11:15:38 #
manderson wrote:
More Eagle photos. I'm not sure which is better. Both photos are the same but the first one is with only slight change to exposure. The second is with a little more PP. Please give comments on which everyone prefers. Photo taken with Nikon D7100, Tamron 150-600 at 320 mm, ISO 100, 1/1000, f/7.1. Both photos cropped.
#1, much sharper and richer in DL!!!
Dec 30, 2015 11:44:21 #
manderson wrote:
More Eagle photos. I'm not sure which is better. Both photos are the same but the first one is with only slight change to exposure. The second is with a little more PP. Please give comments on which everyone prefers. Photo taken with Nikon D7100, Tamron 150-600 at 320 mm, ISO 100, 1/1000, f/7.1. Both photos cropped.
I like #1 because of the bluer sky and less branches to cause a distraction.
Dec 30, 2015 11:51:44 #
Dec 30, 2015 12:13:46 #
Dec 30, 2015 15:33:52 #
Dec 30, 2015 17:14:02 #
Laura72568 wrote:
I like #2...I think the blue sky could be amplified in LR or PS alittle if you want the sky alittle bluer like the first one. Just a thought.
In ACR I can add a little to the sky to darken it and add the blue. Thanks for the thought.
Dec 30, 2015 17:14:56 #
Erv wrote:
Thanks Mike! This is me playing to learn.:) I would also like to put your picture in my carving file if you don't mind. Some day I will find the piece of wood it is in.:)
If you get it carved, that would be something to see.
Dec 30, 2015 17:27:43 #
Dec 30, 2015 17:57:59 #
Dec 30, 2015 23:08:54 #
Dec 31, 2015 00:10:23 #
I'm pretty sure it's "post processing", kfoo. I don't know how to do it but people on here can do amazing things with their photos! Hope that helps.
Sue
Sue
Dec 31, 2015 02:38:42 #
manderson wrote:
More Eagle photos. I'm not sure which is better. Both photos are the same but the first one is with only slight change to exposure. The second is with a little more PP. Please give comments on which everyone prefers. Photo taken with Nikon D7100, Tamron 150-600 at 320 mm, ISO 100, 1/1000, f/7.1. Both photos cropped.
Both are good, but I much prefer the first one. I think the colors are richer, and I like the fact that there is less of the tree showing. I find the additional branches in the second shot somewhat distracting and lessens the importance of the bird as the main focus point.
However, if I had not seen the first image, I would have thought the second was pretty darned good.
Dec 31, 2015 03:44:04 #
Bram boy
Loc: Vancouver Island B.C. Canada
Erv wrote:
Thanks Mike! This is me playing to learn.:) I would also like to put your picture in my carving file if you don't mind. Some day I will find the piece of wood it is in.:)
You got some bling in the bird in this photo but to much in the sky . This bird
In the second sky would be better
Dec 31, 2015 03:49:24 #
Bram boy
Loc: Vancouver Island B.C. Canada
kfoo wrote:
Dumb Question: What is meant by PP in the first post?
Post pressing . Where you doctor the image up . Make it better in other words
Jan 1, 2016 21:45:07 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.