Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Why not make camera settings standard.
Page <<first <prev 3 of 11 next> last>>
Dec 16, 2015 20:48:49   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
boberic wrote:
Can anyone please tell my why Canon uses TV and AV instead of simply S or A ? Shouldn't they want to make it easier for the new users t understand the settings. They don't use unique nomenclature on their lenses.


I was once a new user and it didn't take very much effort to realize that Av = A and Tv = S. To a new user even A and S are confusing as concepts. If you are interested, you educate yourself. If you are not that interested you leave it on full auto or buy a point and shoot.

Reply
Dec 16, 2015 21:02:58   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
mwsilvers wrote:
I was once a new user and it didn't take very much effort to realize that Av = A and Tv = S. To a new user even A and S are confusing as concepts. If you are interested, you educate yourself. If you are not that interested you leave it on full auto or buy a point and shoot.


Good points. A and S could mean so many things: 'A' for 'Advanced User Mode' and 'S' for 'Stupid User Mode', although they're not very viable suggestions from a marketing perspective.

This could be more complicated than we thought! :lol: :lol:

Reply
Dec 16, 2015 21:20:10   #
Mr PC Loc: Austin, TX
 
I had a friend hand his Nikon DSLR to me once and he wondered why it wasn't taking the types of pictures he thought it should. He had it in Aperture priority mode set wide open and thought the A meant "auto". I gave him a quick education and turned the dial back to the real "auto" and he was very happy with his expensive point and shoot after that... It's not worth explaining to someone who has no interest in learning.

Reply
 
 
Dec 16, 2015 21:26:21   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
jim quist wrote:
you know what you can do with your micro 4 turds.


Jim, I don't know if I've ever yelled at you or not......, BUTT, I know funny when I see it!!!!!! :lol: :lol:
SS

Reply
Dec 16, 2015 21:58:31   #
lev29 Loc: Born and living in MA.
 
Peterff wrote:
Sure, the 'v' in 'Tv' and 'Av' is superfluous. It could have just been 'T' and 'A', but would that make a meaningful difference?
I might enjoy using a camera that was excellent with "T&A", but I would still need a suitable model for that function to produce its best results! ...
In answer to your question, sir, NO!! ...

... and that's why those v's shouldn't be there! It's like Beavis once remarked, "Too complicated!"

Ya know, my best friend (known him since age 5,) one of his college roommates, and I have a never-ending debate on a topic similar to what you later allude to above: Is it T&A ... or is it TNA? But we never discuss this in front of their wives.

Truly, lev29 8-)

Reply
Dec 16, 2015 22:16:49   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
lev29 wrote:
Is it T&A ... or is it TNA? But we never discuss this in front of their wives. Truly, lev29 8-)


We may never know the answer to that question, but continuing the research seems to be a worthwhile endeavor. Perhaps I should ask my model friend! :D

Reply
Dec 17, 2015 05:10:03   #
Collie lover Loc: St. Louis, MO
 
tsilva wrote:
What's so hard about understanding time value or aperture value? Oh, it needs to be dumbed down for Nikon users, got it


I have a Canon and never thought about TV being time value (speed) and AV being how much the lens opens.

Reply
 
 
Dec 17, 2015 05:46:38   #
BebuLamar
 
I am a Nikon user and a Nikon fan but Canon used the Tv and Av before others started to use A and S. Well I take it back, others have A before but no S. Canon had A too but its A stands for shutter priority. Check Canon AE-1. Canon introduced Av, Tv and P in the A1. Others started making their camera MASP. Notice that the original Canon A1 doesn't have an M setting.

Reply
Dec 17, 2015 06:17:20   #
GENorkus Loc: Washington Twp, Michigan
 
That's part of being a photographer.

Didn't you know that every manufacturer has a better idea. LoL

As per the original question, who's to say they aren't right and the others are "different"?

Reply
Dec 17, 2015 07:23:08   #
photon56 Loc: North America
 
boberic wrote:
Can anyone please tell my why Canon uses TV and AV instead of simply S or A ? Shouldn't they want to make it easier for the new users t understand the settings. They don't use unique nomenclature on their lenses.


Canon and Nikon are both great camera manufacturer's. I'm not going to bias my reply either way. Having said that, I found the Av and Tv nomenclatures confusing as a neophyte. Yes, it took me a few seconds to look it up and viola, I understood it.

I've researched this a bit on the web and this forum. There is much talk about the exposure triangle; ISO, Aperture and Shutter Speed. Most books and articles refer to the "shutter speed" as a way to control the action of a shot. I don't see much, if any, discussion about the Time of an exposure. Unless you are using Bulb mode and "timing" the shot takes on a different meaning.

It really makes no difference to me what they call it. But seriously folks, who here would ask what Time you have your camera set to? If I were asked that question, I would be looking up the clock settings not the shutter speed.

Reply
Dec 17, 2015 07:39:25   #
johneccles Loc: Leyland UK
 
[quote=tsilva]What's so hard about understanding time value or aperture value? Oh, it needs to be dumbed down for Nikon users, got it

Very well said.

My Olympus camera has:

A letter "A" for aperture

A letter "S" for shutter

A letter "M" for manual

Reply
 
 
Dec 17, 2015 07:41:47   #
tpelczy
 
i think you have that backwords!

Reply
Dec 17, 2015 07:45:14   #
bobmcculloch Loc: NYC, NY
 
Larrymc wrote:
But What????


I don't have to

Reply
Dec 17, 2015 07:52:43   #
zigipha Loc: north nj
 
lev29 wrote:
Well, well, Peterff, ain't we two a solipsistic pair?!

I am not debating at all whether you're correct about Canon or their thinking at all. I've read a bit of what you've posted here and you're obviously well-informed ... BUT if I reiterated the excerpt from above right here, I'd have only one response: (as Steve Martin would say) Well, EXCUSE ME! Maybe you wrote that flippant remark by chance and you just got off to a bad start today. It happens. But come on! Did you really mean that?

Well, well, Peterff, ain't we two a solipsistic pa... (show quote)


meant it or not..was pretty funny lol


:-o :-o :-o :) :-o :)

Reply
Dec 17, 2015 08:06:03   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Peterff wrote:
You make an interesting point, the question is how do we identify that single unfortunate Canon user amongst the millions of fortunate ones! :lol: :lol:

"The" was meant to indicate that any Canon user would be unfortunate. "The" in the generic sense. :D

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.