[quote=MIKE GALLAGHER]28 April 2012
Reading that PICASA is a great Photo Editing Programme I finally downloaded it today. The first hint that all was not right was that it went through my whole computer including 2 External Hard Drives and made an "Index" of every picture there is. That includes not only my photos but ANY PICTURE! I immediately tried to stop it and couldn't.
The download said that no photo would be moved from my files and that they were all safe
O.K. You Guys! "Guys" really is not sexist but refers to other humans. Even women use the term. Here, I am using it to kind of sum up what, perhaps, I have learned here today.
Mike: thanks for the posting. You generated, at last count, some eleven pages. Hope this doesn't make a twelfth. Also, check your anger before posting - might avoid some name calling you did not really want to go out there.
But, after all of these comments, from the terse to the wordy, I fail to see any reference to actual reviews of Picasa. So. I looked for some. Turns out, UTube again, has at least ten videos on it - some with references to other reviews. Then: there's a posting for the ten top photo editing programs(sorry, no "e" here Mike, even though I lived in Canada). Fiind it at:
http://photo-editing-software.com. It does not include Picasa, only software that are offered for purchase. Always, it seems, with a thirty day trial period. It's a useful listing and includes the majors. I won't list them here - go to the Web site to see them - most of them with scattered mention throughout this thread.
Some responses included a "vote" including a "two thumbs up". I did't go through the listings myself to try and tabulate a vote, since maybe listing pros and cons is a better approach, along with giving it a rating, like Ebert, of stars. Be nice if would agree on a rating system of some kind. I respect Ebert's opionion on films and wish he could weigh in on photo editing software.
Reference to Faststone was given, with the opinion that is was "better" than Picasa. I haven't had a chance to check it out yet, but will.
I have tried and use: Lightroom 4, Adobe Photoshop Elements 10, Smart Photo Editor, Serif Photo Plus X4, and Picasa. I did have Gimp installed too, but deleted it without trying it out, since I thought the others served me well enough.
Some are better for some things, than others. I find, for example, the cropping feature in Picasa too limiting and will try it on one of the other programs, if I don't like the Picasa rendering. What I really appreciat in Picasa most of all though, is that it will display a whole file of work for you to review. With side-by-side, as well as other comparisons. On my recent trip to St.Augustine Beach where I was quite prolific, I found it extremely helpful to use Picasa at the end of the day to sort out the work while the shots were still relatively fresh in my mind. The listing of multiple images is like opening a freshly opened box of 35mm slides and spreading them out on a light table and louping the ones that appear most worthy. How great is it to have a laptop as out light table?
Another thing I learned today, and I almost posted the question here before looking on my own, is what the little landscape logo means next to shots in "My Pictures" along with the CR2 file designation. It's apparently Canon's way of indication a pic as a "Raw" image, as opposed to a "Jpeg". If I have that wrong, or incomplete, please help and clarify. That logo has bothered me for a while since I thought it was a camera error and I didn't even click on pic that had it assigned. Brainless idiot, indeed. Now I can appreciate the new DSLRS that take two cards; so one could send Jpegs to one, and Raw to the other.
I'll end this by attaching a recent photo (St. Augustine Beach at sunrise) that I boosted, cropped, and straightened in Picasa. I tried to sharpen too, but I really like it kind of fuzzy. Wanna do more with one of the other program(e)s? Be my guest.