Now this is ONE FROSTY D2X!!!
Picture was taken with a D200, so it couldn't have been in much better condition. Story of the shoot is attached.
http://500px.com/photo/1132916
Nearly as cold as here MT.
Holy iceberg Batman!!!. That conveys COLD in all its different aspects.
Billybuzz wrote:
Holy iceberg Batman!!!. That conveys COLD in all its different aspects.
What about the photographer??
Takes a freezing and keeps on squeezing!!!
LOL
That is one frosty camera and one almost popsicle person.
Which photographer? The one in the picture or the one taking the picture?
MT Shooter wrote:
Now this is ONE FROSTY D2X!!!
Picture was taken with a D200, so it couldn't have been in much better condition. Story of the shoot is attached.
http://500px.com/photo/1132916Hate to burst your bubble but if you study the picture carefully it really looks like a composite image. The camera and hand holding it are a separate image dropped in. At least it looks like that to me.
silver wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
Now this is ONE FROSTY D2X!!!
Picture was taken with a D200, so it couldn't have been in much better condition. Story of the shoot is attached.
http://500px.com/photo/1132916Hate to burst your bubble but if you study the picture carefully it really looks like a composite image. The camera and hand holding it are a separate image dropped in. At least it looks like that to me.
And what purpose would that even serve????
Actually this photo was taken on 2007 and has been widely published. Not much chance of it having been faked, and why would anyone want to????? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
MT Shooter wrote:
silver wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
Now this is ONE FROSTY D2X!!!
Picture was taken with a D200, so it couldn't have been in much better condition. Story of the shoot is attached.
http://500px.com/photo/1132916Hate to burst your bubble but if you study the picture carefully it really looks like a composite image. The camera and hand holding it are a separate image dropped in. At least it looks like that to me.
And what purpose would that even serve????
Actually this photo was taken on 2007 and has been widely published. Not much chance of it having been faked, and why would anyone want to????? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
quote=silver quote=MT Shooter Now this is ONE FR... (
show quote)
There is a lot of this kind of thing being done today. I have no idea why people do this but look at the edge of the area where the hand and camera meet the face. there is a line there that does not look natural. It really looks like a composite. I may be wrong but I do a lot of photoshop work and this looks like it has been put together. Nothing against you, I just see these things. Thake a real good look at the edges of the hand and camera, you will see what I am talking about.
silver wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
silver wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
Now this is ONE FROSTY D2X!!!
Picture was taken with a D200, so it couldn't have been in much better condition. Story of the shoot is attached.
http://500px.com/photo/1132916Hate to burst your bubble but if you study the picture carefully it really looks like a composite image. The camera and hand holding it are a separate image dropped in. At least it looks like that to me.
And what purpose would that even serve????
Actually this photo was taken on 2007 and has been widely published. Not much chance of it having been faked, and why would anyone want to????? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
quote=silver quote=MT Shooter Now this is ONE FR... (
show quote)
There is a lot of this kind of thing being done today. I have no idea why people do this but look at the edge of the area where the hand and camera meet the face. there is a line there that does not look natural. It really looks like a composite. I may be wrong but I do a lot of photoshop work and this looks like it has been put together. Nothing against you, I just see these things. Thake a real good look at the edges of the hand and camera, you will see what I am talking about.
quote=MT Shooter quote=silver quote=MT Shooter ... (
show quote)
I took a real good look at the photo again and I am almost 100% sure that this image is a composite. Also look at the blue area on the right side where the hat is. this has been added on also, I am pretty sure that the photo is a fake.
MT Shooter wrote:
silver wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
Now this is ONE FROSTY D2X!!!
Picture was taken with a D200, so it couldn't have been in much better condition. Story of the shoot is attached.
http://500px.com/photo/1132916Hate to burst your bubble but if you study the picture carefully it really looks like a composite image. The camera and hand holding it are a separate image dropped in. At least it looks like that to me.
And what purpose would that even serve????
Actually this photo was taken on 2007 and has been widely published. Not much chance of it having been faked, and why would anyone want to????? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
quote=silver quote=MT Shooter Now this is ONE FR... (
show quote)
There has been a lot of this type of thing done recently. People will do anything to make a buck. Can you see what I am talking about? Let me know.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I certainly don't see any evidence of manipulation at all.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.