MT Shooter wrote:
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I certainly don't see any evidence of manipulation at all.
Look at the blue area on the upper right carefully around the hat, there are sharp lines around the edge. Also look carefully at the area on the left of the face where the camera meets the face. theres a sharp line there also. Look carefully and you will see it. This image is so obviously a fake and the drop ins are very crude. The blue hat is really a bad job. Look carefully at the blue area near the face on the right of the face and you will see that the blue area has been added in.
Okay MT, thanks for making me turn up my heat in my home. OMG that looks miserable. That is what most would call dedication! I guess I'm just a wuss.... LOL Cheers.
silver wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I certainly don't see any evidence of manipulation at all.
Look at the blue area on the upper right carefully around the hat, there are sharp lines around the edge. Also look carefully at the area on the left of the face where the camera meets the face. theres a sharp line there also. Look carefully and you will see it. This image is so obviously a fake and the drop ins are very crude. The blue hat is really a bad job. Look carefully at the blue area near the face on the right of the face and you will see that the blue area has been added in.
quote=MT Shooter Everyone is entitled to their op... (
show quote)
Yeh and I see the devil sitting on top of the lens frost bite.
What are you smoking and will you share?
silver wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I certainly don't see any evidence of manipulation at all.
Look at the blue area on the upper right carefully around the hat, there are sharp lines around the edge. Also look carefully at the area on the left of the face where the camera meets the face. theres a sharp line there also. Look carefully and you will see it. This image is so obviously a fake and the drop ins are very crude. The blue hat is really a bad job. Look carefully at the blue area near the face on the right of the face and you will see that the blue area has been added in.
quote=MT Shooter Everyone is entitled to their op... (
show quote)
stevenelson wrote:
What are you smoking and will you share?
silver wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I certainly don't see any evidence of manipulation at all.
Look at the blue area on the upper right carefully around the hat, there are sharp lines around the edge. Also look carefully at the area on the left of the face where the camera meets the face. theres a sharp line there also. Look carefully and you will see it. This image is so obviously a fake and the drop ins are very crude. The blue hat is really a bad job. Look carefully at the blue area near the face on the right of the face and you will see that the blue area has been added in.
quote=MT Shooter Everyone is entitled to their op... (
show quote)
What are you smoking and will you share? quote=sil... (
show quote)
LOL
Funny how hallucinogens keep popping up!!!
MT Shooter wrote:
stevenelson wrote:
What are you smoking and will you share?
silver wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I certainly don't see any evidence of manipulation at all.
Look at the blue area on the upper right carefully around the hat, there are sharp lines around the edge. Also look carefully at the area on the left of the face where the camera meets the face. theres a sharp line there also. Look carefully and you will see it. This image is so obviously a fake and the drop ins are very crude. The blue hat is really a bad job. Look carefully at the blue area near the face on the right of the face and you will see that the blue area has been added in.
quote=MT Shooter Everyone is entitled to their op... (
show quote)
What are you smoking and will you share? quote=sil... (
show quote)
LOL
Funny how hallucinogens keep popping up!!!
quote=stevenelson What are you smoking and will y... (
show quote)
Once again, If you look at the blue area on the upper right side on the head, it has been added in to the image. Also something has been done to the hand and camera. This is not the original shot. I am sure that a rather ordinary shot has been manipulated to seem like it has more in it then it really has. I do a lot of photoshop work and the image obviously has been manipulated. Sorry if this insults your enjoyment of the image but you have to take these things for what they are. The image has been manipulated.
silver wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
stevenelson wrote:
What are you smoking and will you share?
silver wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I certainly don't see any evidence of manipulation at all.
Look at the blue area on the upper right carefully around the hat, there are sharp lines around the edge. Also look carefully at the area on the left of the face where the camera meets the face. theres a sharp line there also. Look carefully and you will see it. This image is so obviously a fake and the drop ins are very crude. The blue hat is really a bad job. Look carefully at the blue area near the face on the right of the face and you will see that the blue area has been added in.
quote=MT Shooter Everyone is entitled to their op... (
show quote)
What are you smoking and will you share? quote=sil... (
show quote)
LOL
Funny how hallucinogens keep popping up!!!
quote=stevenelson What are you smoking and will y... (
show quote)
Once again, If you look at the blue area on the upper right side on the head, it has been added in to the image. Also something has been done to the hand and camera. This is not the original shot. I am sure that a rather ordinary shot has been manipulated to seem like it has more in it then it really has. I do a lot of photoshop work and the image obviously has been manipulated. Sorry if this insults your enjoyment of the image but you have to take these things for what they are. The image has been manipulated.
quote=MT Shooter quote=stevenelson What are you ... (
show quote)
Funny how no one agrees with your diagnosis isn't it? Why in the world would anyone put a photographer and a camera through those conditions seperately just to merge 2 shots into one?? It is ludicrous to suggest that. For some reason you just cannot accept that real people actually shoot in these conditions. I do it all winter long and have posted shots here to show that. I guess you just don't have the gear to perform under these conditions and it irks you to no end. Thats the only thing that makes any sense with your posts. Give it a rest.
MT Shooter wrote:
silver wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
stevenelson wrote:
What are you smoking and will you share?
silver wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I certainly don't see any evidence of manipulation at all.
Look at the blue area on the upper right carefully around the hat, there are sharp lines around the edge. Also look carefully at the area on the left of the face where the camera meets the face. theres a sharp line there also. Look carefully and you will see it. This image is so obviously a fake and the drop ins are very crude. The blue hat is really a bad job. Look carefully at the blue area near the face on the right of the face and you will see that the blue area has been added in.
quote=MT Shooter Everyone is entitled to their op... (
show quote)
What are you smoking and will you share? quote=sil... (
show quote)
LOL
Funny how hallucinogens keep popping up!!!
quote=stevenelson What are you smoking and will y... (
show quote)
Once again, If you look at the blue area on the upper right side on the head, it has been added in to the image. Also something has been done to the hand and camera. This is not the original shot. I am sure that a rather ordinary shot has been manipulated to seem like it has more in it then it really has. I do a lot of photoshop work and the image obviously has been manipulated. Sorry if this insults your enjoyment of the image but you have to take these things for what they are. The image has been manipulated.
quote=MT Shooter quote=stevenelson What are you ... (
show quote)
Funny how no one agrees with your diagnosis isn't it? Why in the world would anyone put a photographer and a camera through those conditions seperately just to merge 2 shots into one?? It is ludicrous to suggest that. For some reason you just cannot accept that real people actually shoot in these conditions. I do it all winter long and have posted shots here to show that. I guess you just don't have the gear to perform under these conditions and it irks you to no end. Thats the only thing that makes any sense with your posts. Give it a rest.
quote=silver quote=MT Shooter quote=stevenelson... (
show quote)
From a technical aspect the photograph has definitely been manipulated, anybody that knows photoshop can see it. What probably happened was the original image was very flat and the photographer decided to enhance areas of the image to make it look better so it would be salable. If you know photoshop well you would easily recognize the manipulated areas. This is done every day to make a so so image look better. sorry that this bothers you but the fact of the matter is that the image has been manipulated.
sinatraman
Loc: Vero Beach Florida, Earth,alpha quaudrant
we have proof that Nikon makes white lenses!!!!!!
silver wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
silver wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
stevenelson wrote:
What are you smoking and will you share?
silver wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I certainly don't see any evidence of manipulation at all.
Look at the blue area on the upper right carefully around the hat, there are sharp lines around the edge. Also look carefully at the area on the left of the face where the camera meets the face. theres a sharp line there also. Look carefully and you will see it. This image is so obviously a fake and the drop ins are very crude. The blue hat is really a bad job. Look carefully at the blue area near the face on the right of the face and you will see that the blue area has been added in.
quote=MT Shooter Everyone is entitled to their op... (
show quote)
What are you smoking and will you share? quote=sil... (
show quote)
LOL
Funny how hallucinogens keep popping up!!!
quote=stevenelson What are you smoking and will y... (
show quote)
Once again, If you look at the blue area on the upper right side on the head, it has been added in to the image. Also something has been done to the hand and camera. This is not the original shot. I am sure that a rather ordinary shot has been manipulated to seem like it has more in it then it really has. I do a lot of photoshop work and the image obviously has been manipulated. Sorry if this insults your enjoyment of the image but you have to take these things for what they are. The image has been manipulated.
quote=MT Shooter quote=stevenelson What are you ... (
show quote)
Funny how no one agrees with your diagnosis isn't it? Why in the world would anyone put a photographer and a camera through those conditions seperately just to merge 2 shots into one?? It is ludicrous to suggest that. For some reason you just cannot accept that real people actually shoot in these conditions. I do it all winter long and have posted shots here to show that. I guess you just don't have the gear to perform under these conditions and it irks you to no end. Thats the only thing that makes any sense with your posts. Give it a rest.
quote=silver quote=MT Shooter quote=stevenelson... (
show quote)
From a technical aspect the photograph has definitely been manipulated, anybody that knows photoshop can see it. What probably happened was the original image was very flat and the photographer decided to enhance areas of the image to make it look better so it would be salable. If you know photoshop well you would easily recognize the manipulated areas. This is done every day to make a so so image look better. sorry that this bothers you but the fact of the matter is that the image has been manipulated.
quote=MT Shooter quote=silver quote=MT Shooter ... (
show quote)
Silver, No one gives a rats behind what you think.
Bill MN wrote:
silver wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
silver wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
stevenelson wrote:
What are you smoking and will you share?
silver wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I certainly don't see any evidence of manipulation at all.
Look at the blue area on the upper right carefully around the hat, there are sharp lines around the edge. Also look carefully at the area on the left of the face where the camera meets the face. theres a sharp line there also. Look carefully and you will see it. This image is so obviously a fake and the drop ins are very crude. The blue hat is really a bad job. Look carefully at the blue area near the face on the right of the face and you will see that the blue area has been added in.
quote=MT Shooter Everyone is entitled to their op... (
show quote)
What are you smoking and will you share? quote=sil... (
show quote)
LOL
Funny how hallucinogens keep popping up!!!
quote=stevenelson What are you smoking and will y... (
show quote)
Once again, If you look at the blue area on the upper right side on the head, it has been added in to the image. Also something has been done to the hand and camera. This is not the original shot. I am sure that a rather ordinary shot has been manipulated to seem like it has more in it then it really has. I do a lot of photoshop work and the image obviously has been manipulated. Sorry if this insults your enjoyment of the image but you have to take these things for what they are. The image has been manipulated.
quote=MT Shooter quote=stevenelson What are you ... (
show quote)
Funny how no one agrees with your diagnosis isn't it? Why in the world would anyone put a photographer and a camera through those conditions seperately just to merge 2 shots into one?? It is ludicrous to suggest that. For some reason you just cannot accept that real people actually shoot in these conditions. I do it all winter long and have posted shots here to show that. I guess you just don't have the gear to perform under these conditions and it irks you to no end. Thats the only thing that makes any sense with your posts. Give it a rest.
quote=silver quote=MT Shooter quote=stevenelson... (
show quote)
From a technical aspect the photograph has definitely been manipulated, anybody that knows photoshop can see it. What probably happened was the original image was very flat and the photographer decided to enhance areas of the image to make it look better so it would be salable. If you know photoshop well you would easily recognize the manipulated areas. This is done every day to make a so so image look better. sorry that this bothers you but the fact of the matter is that the image has been manipulated.
quote=MT Shooter quote=silver quote=MT Shooter ... (
show quote)
Silver, No one gives a rats behind what you think.
quote=silver quote=MT Shooter quote=silver quo... (
show quote)
I really thought that this was a forum that would help people learn about photography and photographic processes. Your comment is so sad and vitriolic. I guess that nobody can tell you anything. I see something in this image and my viewpoint is just as important as yours. Its sad when something like this causes a riff in communication. I am just pointing out something that should be very obvious to anybody that knows anything about photoshop but I guess that the know it alls are to self important to open there eyes and see. All I want to do is show you in particular that the snow covered camera image is a manipulated image and in the spirit of this site. I guess that this site is more political then I thought. I so sorry that you cant see any farther then your nose and maybe someday you will realize that there are some people that know what they are talking about. Just out of curiosity what qualifications do you have when it comes to photographic knowledge?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
