A few insights into the San Bernardino jihad attack (Page 4): Okay greenie, I get it. Now, a question for you. You are a man of the world and I am sure know several languages. I heard...

SBW

green wrote:

who knows what these labels mean anymore?...anarchy is freedom from government, yes?

in some respects, maybe so...

fiscally conservative , and socially liberal, though...

Okay greenie, I get it.
Now, a question for you. You are a man of the world and I am sure know several languages. I heard that Syed Rizwan Farook (Arabic name for the male terrorist shooter) translated to English means "climate change". Do you think that is true? I mean the community organizer said that climate change is our biggest threat. Just wondering.

Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, Colorado

SBW wrote:

Okay greenie, I get it.
Now, a question for you. You are a man of the world and I am sure know several languages. I heard that Syed Rizwan Farook (Arabic name for the male terrorist shooter) translated to English means "climate change". Do you think that is true? I mean the community organizer said that climate change is our biggest threat. Just wondering.

I chuckled at that one SB! :thumbup:

bodacious Loc: Oregon

SBW wrote:

Okay greenie, I get it.
Now, a question for you. You are a man of the world and I am sure know several languages. I heard that Syed Rizwan Farook (Arabic name for the male terrorist shooter) translated to English means "climate change". Do you think that is true? I mean the community organizer said that climate change is our biggest threat. Just wondering.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :lol: :lol: :lol: Kinda makes me wonder how many more "climate change" persons are out there and if there might be a couple BS Obummer doesn't know about.

green Loc: 22.1749611,-159.646704,20

SBW wrote:

Okay greenie, I get it.
Now, a question for you. You are a man of the world and I am sure know several languages. I heard that Syed Rizwan Farook (Arabic name for the male terrorist shooter) translated to English means "climate change". Do you think that is true? I mean the community organizer said that climate change is our biggest threat. Just wondering.

depends if you're talking greatest threat, or most dramatic, fear-inducing threat (that's the core concept of terrorism)

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/09/27/climate-change-kills-400-000-a-year-new-report-reveals.html

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/premature-deaths-multiply-as-climate-changes/

http://www.nrdc.org/globalwarming/killer-heat/

http://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/science/indicators/health-society/heat-deaths.html

http://environment.about.com/od/globalwarmingandhealth/a/gw_deaths.htm

http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2015/nov/23/somaliland-climate-change-drought-cyclones-life-or-death-challenge

http://ecowatch.com/2015/06/24/pakistan-heat-wave/

http://mic.com/articles/21419/climate-change-kills-5-million-people-every-year#.QmN2cn0JG

http://blogs-images.forbes.com/niallmccarthy/files/2015/10/20151002_Guns_Fo.jpg

...based strictly on numbers, I'd say climate change is #1 (I agree with our military commanders on this) ...heart disease is #2, cancer is #3, guns would be #4 (now surpassing automobile deaths) cars would be #5...

now terrorism gets way better coverage from the lame-stream media... for instance over 200 people were killed in automobile crashes SINCE the SB shooting... but what's getting all the coverage?

*puts on flame-proof nomex bodysuit* :mrgreen:

Los-Angeles-Shooter Loc: Los Angeles

The vast majority of firearms deaths were either suicides (64%) or one criminal killing another criminal. By contrast jihad is directed against civilians. Experience around the world indicates that much of the jihad directly targets women and children.

Another issue that gun-haters ignore is the vast deterrent value of an armed populace in deterring violent crime as well as stopping it. This benefit sharply outweighs the relatively minor harm of guns. Anyone who talks about guns and ignores the deterrent effect is either ignorant or dishonest. The deterrent and self-defense facts are why the majority of states have followed the FL example and enacted "shall issue" laws regarding CCW. These laws set reasonable standards to replace the biased whim of local law enforcement bureaucrats.

nakkh Loc: San Mateo, Ca

Terrorism sells soap on TeeVee...

green wrote:

depends if you're talking greatest threat, or most... (show quote)

green Loc: 22.1749611,-159.646704,20

Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:

The vast majority of firearms deaths were either s... (show quote)

has there ever been an armed populace actually being a vast deterrent to mass shootings in recent (or ancient) history? I'd love to see some data that confirms what you are saying.

nakkh Loc: San Mateo, Ca

Oh shortpants, you little tinpot suckup...

SBW wrote:

:thumbup:

McKinneyMike Loc: Texas

Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:

Another issue that gun-haters ignore is the vast deterrent value of an armed populace in deterring violent crime as well as stopping it.

Then why are all of you wingnuts so torqued up about radical Muslims? This country is armed to the teeth now and you yourself stated that an armed populace deters violent crime.

You wingnuts are more afraid than just about any other group I am aware of given what you all post on any given day. You own the majority of the guns in America and worry more than a 100 lb white female in the ghetto.

I am a gun owner myself, but feel free to lump all liberals in a basket of your own bias.

bodacious Loc: Oregon

green wrote:

has there ever been an armed populace actually being a vast deterrent to mass shootings in recent (or ancient) history? I'd love to see some data that confirms what you are saying.

Wonder what the gun violence was before 1962 when all this anti gun crap got started. Seems it was a pretty safe country to live in when the majority were armed. I don't remember the problems with weapons nor any other crap we have now, racism is back big time but that's their own fault an offshoot of PC and not because of the white people and other minority's. Your turn libs.

bvm Loc: Glendale, Arizona

nakkh wrote:

It's very rare for there to be more than one shooter in these mass shootings.

My question is, didn't their neighbors notice any strange activity at these people's house? The place was a bomb factory.

The neighbor said she saw it but didn't want to appear anti-islamic.

So like all PCers she chose to say nothing.

I hope she feels some guilt for being an ass.

SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA

I'm wondering...
So does Farook get his 72 virgins now?
And just what does his wife get?
What will Allah think of her wearing a red bra?

SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA

bvm wrote:

The neighbor said she saw it but didn't want to appear anti-islamic.

So like all PCers she chose to say nothing.

I hope she feels some guilt for being an ass.

Liberals never feel guilt.
Don't you know by now that it's all Bush's fault?

bodacious Loc: Oregon

bvm wrote:

The neighbor said she saw it but didn't want to appear anti-islamic.

So like all PCers she chose to say nothing.

I hope she feels some guilt for being an ass.

I have heard of a guilty liberal but never a liberal with guilt, that would be something new and unexpected.

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

green wrote:

You don't know Redlands... this is a very conservative community.

Right next to Fontana, the porta potty, and drug manufacturing center of California