I am planning to buy one of these lenses,
Jul 24, 2015 08:15:10 #
Eurolux
Loc: NYC
I also have the D5300. First bought the Sigma 10-20 and liked it, but very quickly upgraded to the Tokina 11-16 version II, the one with the focus motor. Great build quality and it delivers beautiful wide angle images. I've done extensive research and, for me, it was the best wide angle lens choice. It even works on full frame to a limited extent.
Others here have recommended taking along a P&S too. Probably a good idea. You can pick up a refurb long zoom for peanuts and cover the range beyond 300mm.
Others here have recommended taking along a P&S too. Probably a good idea. You can pick up a refurb long zoom for peanuts and cover the range beyond 300mm.
Jul 24, 2015 08:45:09 #
FrodoBaggins wrote:
There is a Sigma 8-16mm that is very highly regarded and wider than the rest.
I've had my eye on the reviews for this lens for a bit... Thinking of adding it to my arsenal!
I've had my eye on the reviews for this lens for a bit... Thinking of adding it to my arsenal!
Truly excellent lens with surprisingly little distortion.
Jul 24, 2015 10:07:45 #
jfn007 wrote:
Basically I need your advice. I am planning to pur... (show quote)
The Tokina 11-16 is a great lens. However, like many of their multi-coated offerings, it is prone to flare and some distortion when used at widest setting-this is typical of most wide angle lenses. See photo taken at 11mm. I can not tell you how it compares with the others in your list.
Jul 24, 2015 10:42:42 #
I would grab the Tokina 11-16 F2.8, remains one my favorites.
:thumbup:
jfn007 wrote:
Basically I need your advice. I am planning to pur... (show quote)
:thumbup:
Jul 24, 2015 10:45:07 #
phlash46 wrote:
Truly excellent lens with surprisingly little distortion.
Thanks... Do you Find it easy to get use to?
Jul 24, 2015 11:16:57 #
jfn007 wrote:
Basically I need your advice. I am planning to pur... (show quote)
The Candidate is: Tokina 11-16 F2.8
Got it and love it.
Craig
Jul 24, 2015 11:36:01 #
Wow - Nikon 12-24mm f4 $45200 - is rhat the auto or straight stick tranny model.
Jul 24, 2015 12:01:46 #
sirlensalot
Loc: Arizona
Personally, would opt for a larger aperture and widest option considering it is going to be a 1.5 crop. I would want that for city scenes, and landscapes shot hand held.
Jul 24, 2015 12:06:04 #
MarkD wrote:
I have a Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 HSM that I like very ... (show quote)
I will speak of the Sigma 10-20 and agree with MarkD about it. It is a good lens and it is built well. Images are sharp. It is easy to get vignetting 10mm with any filters. I prefer 12mm with the lens. I pland to shoot star trails with the lens Aug 14.
Jul 24, 2015 12:09:20 #
I vote Tokina 12-28 f4 as seen here - http://www.kenrockwell.com/tokina/12-28mm.htm
Shop and it can be had for much less than $560 ....
Shop and it can be had for much less than $560 ....
Jul 24, 2015 14:19:01 #
Bram boy
Loc: Vancouver Island B.C. Canada
I would get the sigma 10-20 if it was good enough for Thom hogan
To put on his camera and leave it there . And put his 12-24 nikon away in a box on a shelf . The sigma should be good enough for what ever .
The tokena is good also . But you could get a bad copy . Like buying a car made on Friday .
To put on his camera and leave it there . And put his 12-24 nikon away in a box on a shelf . The sigma should be good enough for what ever .
The tokena is good also . But you could get a bad copy . Like buying a car made on Friday .
Jul 24, 2015 14:23:57 #
Bram boy
Loc: Vancouver Island B.C. Canada
Bram boy wrote:
I would get the sigma 10-20 if it was good enough for Thom hogan
To put on his camera and leave it there . And put his 12-24 nikon away in a box on a shelf . The sigma should be good enough for what ever .
The tokena is good also . But you could get a bad copy . Like buying a car made on Friday .
To put on his camera and leave it there . And put his 12-24 nikon away in a box on a shelf . The sigma should be good enough for what ever .
The tokena is good also . But you could get a bad copy . Like buying a car made on Friday .
and that extra two points in wide 10 versus 12 . when I use mine it's never
On 12 always on 10 mm and hardly ever on 20 mm 2 mm make a difference
Jul 24, 2015 16:47:54 #
SharpShooter wrote:
I would get the one that's $45,200 just so I could brag that I have it.
I would put it on the camera and never take it off.
I would also permanently carry the camera with me whether I need it or not.
Kinda like wearing a 5 carat diamond ring!!! :lol: :lol:
Anyway, that's just what I would do!!!!!
Your welcome!
SS
I would put it on the camera and never take it off.
I would also permanently carry the camera with me whether I need it or not.
Kinda like wearing a 5 carat diamond ring!!! :lol: :lol:
Anyway, that's just what I would do!!!!!
Your welcome!
SS
If I could afford a $45,200 lens, I wouldn't care what advice anybody else had ;-)
But I highly recommend the Tokina 11-16 f2.8. It has served me well on my D7100 and D7200. fast and sharp, especially at f4 and about 13mm.
Jul 24, 2015 17:09:41 #
I have th 14 - 24 Nikon and I can tell you that it is one of the sharpest lenses in my bag. Including a 85mm 1.4!
I would go with that lens for a lot more than landscapes, but your camera will hold you back a little. Hook a D810 on that baby and it unbeatable.
I would go with that lens for a lot more than landscapes, but your camera will hold you back a little. Hook a D810 on that baby and it unbeatable.
Jul 24, 2015 18:51:19 #
I have a Tokina 16-28mm F2.8 that worked very well on a recent trip to Paris and Normandy. Purchased at B&H for $549.00.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.