Intelligent Design: Waking Up To Creation
Jul 17, 2015 10:39:46 #
James Shaw wrote:
Nope, not worth watching, even the first time. Science does not support superstition, no matter how many time one watches your video, Rac. You just don't get it! You need basic science education.
That's simply because you're opposed to "reason" and "thinking".
Jul 17, 2015 10:57:37 #
Quote:
Bangee5 wrote:
I take it that you are not a Christian? That you do not believe in the God of the Bible? Perhaps you have a vision of some other god?
If you are not with us then you are against us. Regardless of what you call it, religion is what you believe and in whom you believe and of whom you worship.
"my belief in Him gives Him power in my life"
I take it that you are not a Christian? That you do not believe in the God of the Bible? Perhaps you have a vision of some other god?
If you are not with us then you are against us. Regardless of what you call it, religion is what you believe and in whom you believe and of whom you worship.
"my belief in Him gives Him power in my life"
bull drink water wrote:
if i'm not with you, i'm against you???? sounds like a Christian jihad to me. a belief in God IS NOT RELIGEON.
I do not worship God, and see nowhere where he has asked me to obey Him.
not with you or against you, just along side of you. as long as you all don't bug or piss me off, we are ok.
oh, one more $0.02, at one time or another I was a catholic, a Baptist and a friend, but I got over it.
I do not worship God, and see nowhere where he has asked me to obey Him.
not with you or against you, just along side of you. as long as you all don't bug or piss me off, we are ok.
oh, one more $0.02, at one time or another I was a catholic, a Baptist and a friend, but I got over it.
Bangee's whole ploy is to scare the irrational into believing what he believes, but he is losing big time, and his approach is why the numbers of those calling themselves Christians continues to drop.
Bangee is a fool. big time. He destroys, by his words, what he would have others accept that which he believes. It is like sitting on a limb for support then cutting it off and falling into the abyss of stupidity.
Jul 17, 2015 11:02:41 #
Quote:
James Shaw wrote:
Nope, not worth watching, even the first time. Science does not support superstition, no matter how many time one watches your video, Rac. You just don't get it! You need basic science education.
Nope, not worth watching, even the first time. Science does not support superstition, no matter how many time one watches your video, Rac. You just don't get it! You need basic science education.
LarJgrip wrote:
That's simply because you're opposed to "reason" and "thinking".
Plain and simple, Science has nothing to do with superstition. Science deals with reason, superstition with faith. And that is why the church was forced not to interfere and reprimand those who did their own thinking, even if it went against another one's faith, including the Church's belief.
You need basic science education.
Jul 17, 2015 14:11:36 #
James Shaw wrote:
Plain and simple, Science has nothing to do with superstition. Science deals with reason, superstition with faith. And that is why the church was forced not to interfere and reprimand those who did their own thinking, even if it went against another one's faith, including the Church's belief.
You need basic science education.
You need basic science education.
Really? Basic science confirms that you cannot get matter from non-matter, you cannot get intelligence from non-intelligence.
You claim to be a thinker James, is it reasonable in your thinking mind to get matter from non-matter or intelligence from non-intelligence.
Would that be a yes or no?
Jul 17, 2015 14:15:53 #
LarJgrip wrote:
Really? Basic science confirms that you cannot get matter from non-matter...Would that be a yes or no?
Really? maybe basic science when you went to school...
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-virtual-particles-rea/
Jul 17, 2015 14:27:42 #
Quote:
James Shaw wrote:
Plain and simple, Science has nothing to do with superstition. Science deals with reason, superstition with faith. And that is why the church was forced not to interfere and reprimand those who did their own thinking, even if it went against another one's faith, including the Church's belief.
You need basic science education.
Plain and simple, Science has nothing to do with superstition. Science deals with reason, superstition with faith. And that is why the church was forced not to interfere and reprimand those who did their own thinking, even if it went against another one's faith, including the Church's belief.
You need basic science education.
LarJgrip wrote:
Really? Basic science confirms that you cannot get matter from non-matter, you cannot get intelligence from non-intelligence.
You claim to be a thinker James, is it reasonable in your thinking mind to get matter from non-matter or intelligence from non-intelligence.
Would that be a yes or no?
You claim to be a thinker James, is it reasonable in your thinking mind to get matter from non-matter or intelligence from non-intelligence.
Would that be a yes or no?
Your statement is incorrect: "Basic science confirms that you cannot get matter from non-matter" (your words LarJ). That is absolutely incorrect. If you believe that I am wrong then please state your evidence?
Start with your meaning of E=mc(squared). Then explain the Higgs boson that has recently been discovered, but was predicted to exist in the 1960's.
Jul 17, 2015 14:29:45 #
silver
Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
LarJgrip wrote:
Really? Basic science confirms that you cannot get matter from non-matter, you cannot get intelligence from non-intelligence.
You claim to be a thinker James, is it reasonable in your thinking mind to get matter from non-matter or intelligence from non-intelligence.
Would that be a yes or no?
You claim to be a thinker James, is it reasonable in your thinking mind to get matter from non-matter or intelligence from non-intelligence.
Would that be a yes or no?
Yes, no, maybe, sometimes, what, who cares.
Jul 17, 2015 14:34:42 #
LarJgrip wrote:
Really? Basic science confirms that you cannot get matter from non-matter, you cannot get intelligence from non-intelligence.
You claim to be a thinker James, is it reasonable in your thinking mind to get matter from non-matter or intelligence from non-intelligence.
Would that be a yes or no?
You claim to be a thinker James, is it reasonable in your thinking mind to get matter from non-matter or intelligence from non-intelligence.
Would that be a yes or no?
Yes...and emphatically no. Nobody knows what matter comes from, but intelligence from non-intlelligence? My 2 year old grandson had no detectable intelligence 2 years ago, and now is gaining intelligence by leaps and bounds. I point this out because I hate to see poor logic in arguments, especially when they have nothing to do with the argument. Whether intelligence can come from non-intelligence (it can) has nothing to do with intelligent design. It sounds like some simplified argument based on a misrepresentation of the second law of thermodynamics, which is always misquoted and misunderstood by creationists.
Jul 17, 2015 14:35:20 #
Quote:
James Shaw wrote:
Plain and simple, Science has nothing to do with superstition. Science deals with reason, superstition with faith. And that is why the church was forced not to interfere and reprimand those who did their own thinking, even if it went against another one's faith, including the Church's belief.
You need basic science education.
Plain and simple, Science has nothing to do with superstition. Science deals with reason, superstition with faith. And that is why the church was forced not to interfere and reprimand those who did their own thinking, even if it went against another one's faith, including the Church's belief.
You need basic science education.
LarJgrip wrote:
Really? Basic science confirms that you cannot get matter from non-matter, you cannot get intelligence from non-intelligence.
You claim to be a thinker James, is it reasonable in your thinking mind to get matter from non-matter or intelligence from non-intelligence.
Would that be a yes or no?
You claim to be a thinker James, is it reasonable in your thinking mind to get matter from non-matter or intelligence from non-intelligence.
Would that be a yes or no?
Intelligence is a brain thing. Until there is a brain there is no intelligence. What are you thinking here? Perhaps you have been spending too much time in la-la land with Rac-O the Wack-O?
Jul 17, 2015 15:49:40 #
Slice and dice it anyway you want, any thinking person knows that you can't get something from nothing.
And if today scientists say that virtual particles are appearing from nothing then tomorrow they will say that findings show there is something there after all
because science is advancing and learning.
And whether you agree or disagree the more we learn scientifically the more science confirms an intelligent designer. It's happening right in front of your face and you still deny it.
And if today scientists say that virtual particles are appearing from nothing then tomorrow they will say that findings show there is something there after all
because science is advancing and learning.
And whether you agree or disagree the more we learn scientifically the more science confirms an intelligent designer. It's happening right in front of your face and you still deny it.
Jul 17, 2015 16:11:36 #
LarJgrip wrote:
Slice and dice it anyway you want, any thinking pe... (show quote)
Science cannot confirm superstition! An "intelligent designer" is fiction and fiction is out of the realm of science. ID is not a real thing, just a figment of your imagination. You would do well to get a basic science education. Believe as you will but belief does not necessarily make so.
You like Rac are ignorant to belabor this point. Just plain ignorant. How does it feel to be ignorant when knowledge surrounds you and you do nothing about it?
Jul 17, 2015 18:33:48 #
silver
Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
LarJgrip wrote:
Slice and dice it anyway you want, any thinking pe... (show quote)
Your statement is totally ridiculous. Unintelligent design is so not scientific. HAHA Theres an invisible guy living in the sky that created the earth and the universe in 6 days but 3 of those days had no sun or moon so how were they days? Boy, that really makes sense. And how about that big flood that this guy sent to destroy everybody because he was having a bad day and this invisible guy told only one guy about the flood and he built a ship that had 2 of every animal on earth? boy that really makes sense. And how about the first people, a guy created from dirt and a girl created from one of his ribs, really logical. By the way did those two first people have belly buttons? HAHAHAHAHAHAH your just another sad rac follower with racs nutty posts.
Jul 17, 2015 18:43:48 #
LarJgrip wrote:
Slice and dice it anyway you want, any thinking pe... (show quote)
Just exactly where, LarJ, is there nothing in the universe? No such place. You are limiting your thinking. Nothing has never been demonstrated. Nothing has never existed, despite what you may believe from your science textbook (Bible).
Jul 17, 2015 20:19:25 #
James Shaw wrote:
Just exactly where, LarJ, is there nothing in the universe? No such place. You are limiting your thinking. Nothing has never been demonstrated. Nothing has never existed, despite what you may believe from your science textbook (Bible).
Oh I see, you're one of those who believes that the universe is eternal and had no beginning. Well guess what your science has proven that to be false.
*I say "your science" because you seem to think that the bible is a science book but you're wrong. In fact I find that you make a lot of false statements.
Just so you know, science is science and the scientific argument for ID is getting stronger every day.
Jul 18, 2015 04:57:23 #
silver
Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
LarJgrip wrote:
Oh I see, you're one of those who believes that the universe is eternal and had no beginning. Well guess what your science has proven that to be false.
*I say "your science" because you seem to think that the bible is a science book but you're wrong. In fact I find that you make a lot of false statements.
Just so you know, science is science and the scientific argument for ID is getting stronger every day.
*I say "your science" because you seem to think that the bible is a science book but you're wrong. In fact I find that you make a lot of false statements.
Just so you know, science is science and the scientific argument for ID is getting stronger every day.
I get it, YOUR RAC in disguise. You are still very funny rac.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VT5xKrqgpj8
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.