Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Your wedding photographer ??
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Jul 2, 2015 06:47:59   #
Dave R. Loc: PNW
 
1969 and the cost was something my wives parents funded so I haven't a clue. I do know they turned out very nice and we do occasionally still look at them. Now my daughters wedding was 9 years ago which her mother and I funded. Again I don't recall the exact cost but I do remember nearly having heart failure when told. They also turned out fabulous so looking back we are very glad we had that photographer to do the event.

Reply
Jul 2, 2015 07:14:59   #
Michael Hartley Loc: Deer Capital of Georgia
 
lighthouse wrote:
This is classic!
I don't care if its true or not, its a damned good story.


100% TRUE. The judges office was right behind the Krystal (White Castle up north), care to guess where our marriage lunch was?

Reply
Jul 2, 2015 07:15:02   #
Jcmarino
 
1987, paid $100.00 received all the rolls of film to have printed. No editing. Just stuck them in am album. LOL

Reply
 
 
Jul 2, 2015 07:19:42   #
Bizzy Loc: North Carolina
 
1971, $400. We got the only photographer in the area that wasn't already booked that weekend. After meeting him I knew why. It took awhile to get the pictures, but actually most of them were pretty good. He closed up shop right after I finally got the pictures (only about 10 8x10's). He wasn't a bad photographer but terrible with people.

Reply
Jul 2, 2015 07:30:14   #
Anandnra Loc: Tennessee
 
1982, Used my own Canon A-1, with the 50 mm 1.4 FD lens and about 20 rolls (36 exp) of Kodachrome 64. Had a friend who had never handled my equipment before shoot it for me and he did an admirable job of it.

Reply
Jul 2, 2015 08:02:04   #
Impressionist
 
Kodachrome slides most shot by close friend in 1979. Brownies were awesome along with the Rum Cake. Got to keep Bride.

Reply
Jul 2, 2015 08:07:27   #
guitarbts Loc: Charlotte, NC
 
1981
Not sure of the cost because my father-In law paid the photographer.
The photographer was a pro, shot film and really did a great job. My wife and I still enjoy them 34 years later.

Reply
 
 
Jul 2, 2015 08:08:15   #
guitarbts Loc: Charlotte, NC
 
1981
Not sure of the cost because my father-In law paid the photographer.
The photographer was a pro, shot film and really did a great job. My wife and I still enjoy them 34 years later.

Reply
Jul 2, 2015 08:33:27   #
wcmoorejr Loc: Birmingham Alabama
 
1992 400 for the shoot and a proof book. Last minute booking as our original photographer got shipped off to Desert Storm. We probably paid another 1000 for the final pictures. He did an excellent job. We got no outside shots but that was not the fault of the photographer. We had a freak snow storm in the deep south.

Reply
Jul 2, 2015 08:34:52   #
Chuck_893 Loc: Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
 
Michael Hartley wrote:
1985, wife's seven year old son was the photographer at the judges office. Got one photo of the deer head on the wall, one of a ten pound bass, one of me, the wife, and judge. Wife is kinda short, so me and the judge are just shoulders down.

Michael, :lol: :thumbup: That is classic, and beyond funny, not to mention sweet!

I was our wedding photographer! 1970, pretty broke, traveled by road to Casper, Wyoming for wife's mother's sake. Did the whole thing ourselves. My wife made her own lovely candlelight gown. I honestly thought at the time that I was a fertogafer (couldn't spell it), and my Yashica TLR had a gee-whiz Self Timer! Save lots of $$$! Wheeee!

In those days I shot all B&W processed myself. I preset the thing to get a ceremony shot, tripped by someone else as we faced each other at the altar. It was great! Nailed the available-light exposure, the window looked wonderful even in B&W.

Ceremony over I added the flash, a big potato-masher Honeywell, but I cranked the exposure so the flash was dominant. Lost the window, lost the candles... I didn't blow the wedding; the shots were fine, just could have been much, much better. Learning curve.

Biggest headache was the time it took. You can't shoot just one! Each setup was shot at least twice, and I did Bride + mother, Bride + sister (Matron of Honor), added mother... I suspect it took an hour and the custodian threw us out. :lol:

The guests, mostly older ladies waiting at bride's mom's home for the reception to FINALLY (!!!) start were visibly irritated when we finally showed up. Oops. :oops: :cry: :roll:

Reply
Jul 2, 2015 09:02:48   #
jkm757 Loc: San Diego, Ca.
 
1977. I don't know how much the photographer charged. The photos were ok. Nothing you would be embarrass to show others, but not award winning either. After all these years the photos look as good today as they did the day they were taken. I can't say the same about the now ex wife. She only lasted five years.

Reply
 
 
Jul 2, 2015 09:22:49   #
windshoppe Loc: Arizona
 
Married 1967. "Photographer" was my grandfather, a serious hobbyist with good equipment. He kept gleefully popping up in various locations at the church and later at the reception with flashbulbs popping continuously. Unfortunately, he later discovered that he had failed to put film in the camera. No cost -- no photos either!

Reply
Jul 2, 2015 09:28:36   #
Chuck_893 Loc: Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
 
windshoppe wrote:
Married 1967. "Photographer" was my grandfather, a serious hobbyist with good equipment. He kept gleefully popping up in various locations at the church and later at the reception with flashbulbs popping continuously. Unfortunately, he later discovered that he had failed to put film in the camera. No cost -- no photos either!

Oh gosh. Tragic. It's happened to everyone at least once! :oops: :cry:

Reply
Jul 2, 2015 09:37:11   #
OddJobber Loc: Portland, OR
 
1995, third marriage for both of us.
Married in the Little White Chapel drive through window in Vegas.
Reception was Twinkies and RC at a 7-11.
Photographer was another customer who I handed my camera to.
I lost the film before it was developed. :(

Reply
Jul 2, 2015 09:38:22   #
Jencast2008 Loc: Michigan
 
insman1132 wrote:
Lets have some fun. Lots of talk on this site about Wedding Photographers in the current day. But how about your wedding day. What year was your wedding, what did you pay your photographer, and what did you get for your money?

I'll start.
Wedding in 1959. Paid photographer $50. Got 10 8x10's in an album in black and white.



After being together 17 yrs we finally did it in 2008....$0...friends and family...3 different ones....over 100 pics between them all.....my sister shot on film...not many turned out great because the film was old! I had to pay to get them developed....don't remember like $10 or something. She forgot she had a digital camera! Love these stories too.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.