Check out Street Photography section of our forum.
SigMonster
Mar 29, 2012 11:21:26 #
MT Shooter wrote:
Hey guys, I thought it was ME that was supposed to get excited over a new lens!!
Now that's a lens. I suggest lifting weights and working out while waiting for delivery. If it's not sharp you can always use it for batting practice. :thumbup:
Mar 29, 2012 11:39:43 #
MT Shooter wrote:
Just wondering if anyone here has used the "S... (show quote)
Color me green.....would love to see a moon shot of the upper right quadrant with the ragged curvature outlined against the black sky.
Mar 29, 2012 12:43:13 #
Congrats MT that is some lens....looking forward to seeing those bear and wolves shots.
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Mar 29, 2012 13:23:36 #
Hey MT Shooter I know the lens will be in good hands. Thank you for sharing your extensive knowledge with us.
Mar 29, 2012 13:28:16 #
Mar 29, 2012 13:57:48 #
I obviously won't be buying that lens anytime soon (even though it would be fun to own). It cost almost 60% of my gross wages I made last year!!
Mar 29, 2012 13:58:16 #
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Mar 29, 2012 14:15:41 #
Wonka
Loc: Reno NV.
Why would tou even assume he bought a lens with a focal length like that for indoor's ?
Mar 29, 2012 14:17:18 #
Wonka
Loc: Reno NV.
rpavich wrote:
What? a 275.6 in minimum focusing distance? You'll NEVER be able to take good indoor low light party shots with that!...what a piece of crap!..I'm sticking with my 50mm f/1.8!
Your an Idiot!
:)
MT Shooter wrote:
I have been reading reviews and ogling it for some time now and finally pulled the trigger on one this morning and was just looking for a little first hand info.
What? a 275.6 in minimum focusing distance? You'll NEVER be able to take good indoor low light party shots with that!...what a piece of crap!..I'm sticking with my 50mm f/1.8!
Your an Idiot!
:)
Mar 29, 2012 14:17:43 #
Wonka
Loc: Reno NV.
rpavich wrote:
What? a 275.6 in minimum focusing distance? You'll NEVER be able to take good indoor low light party shots with that!...what a piece of crap!..I'm sticking with my 50mm f/1.8!
Your an Idiot!
:)
MT Shooter wrote:
I have been reading reviews and ogling it for some time now and finally pulled the trigger on one this morning and was just looking for a little first hand info.
What? a 275.6 in minimum focusing distance? You'll NEVER be able to take good indoor low light party shots with that!...what a piece of crap!..I'm sticking with my 50mm f/1.8!
Your an Idiot!
:)
Mar 29, 2012 14:21:19 #
Wonka wrote:
Why would tou even assume he bought a lens with a focal length like that for indoor's ?
Maybe it was a tongue in cheek comment.
Mar 29, 2012 14:33:36 #
Mac wrote:
Maybe it was a tongue in cheek comment.
Wonka wrote:
Why would tou even assume he bought a lens with a focal length like that for indoor's ?
Maybe it was a tongue in cheek comment.
Ya think? Funny though. I wonder if you can get a reversal ring for macro? :roll:
Mar 29, 2012 14:42:32 #
Mar 29, 2012 15:10:06 #
Mar 29, 2012 15:14:14 #
Bob.J wrote:
MT,
I thought this was the SigMonster :mrgreen:
I thought this was the SigMonster :mrgreen:
Shouldn't that be mounted on the back of a truck like a 50 cal.?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.