Nikon24-70 2.8 vs Tamron 24-70 2.8
Apr 8, 2015 11:45:31 #
Jake22 wrote:
I am familiar with the Nikon and am surprised to learn about the Tamron's weight. Am going to B&H this weekend, will check it out. Thanks.
The Tamron weighs just a hair less than 2 pounds, I don't know the weight of other comparable lenses.
Apr 8, 2015 11:52:34 #
jerryc41 wrote:
Beautiful!
Thanks! :thumbup:
(sorry for those multiple posts) :thumbdown:
Apr 8, 2015 12:08:22 #
Apr 8, 2015 12:29:03 #
Jake22 wrote:
Nikon is 1.9888lbs (Ken Rockwell).
I'd prefer to have a more accurate statement of the weight. Is that the best Ken can do? :D
Apr 8, 2015 12:37:38 #
Apr 8, 2015 18:30:20 #
Greenguy33 wrote:
I bought my Tamron 24-70 based on a few things. First DxO Labs rates it higher than the Nikon 24-70. When a professional photographer/mentor told me he sold his Nikon 24-70 and 70-200 for the Tamron equivalents, that was enough for me to get the Tamron.
I took this photo last weekend with the Tamron 24-70mm.
I took this photo last weekend with the Tamron 24-70mm.
May I ask where the shot was taken. curious
Tnx.
Apr 8, 2015 18:32:51 #
Jahawk wrote:
May I ask where the shot was taken. curious
Tnx.
Tnx.
Downtown Providence, RI
Apr 9, 2015 05:38:19 #
I have the Tamron and my mate has the Nikon, I so wish I had gone for the Nikon, His is sharper and the Tamron does hunt a lot especially if I don't use the center focus point on my D7100. Its sharpest at f8 and at 2.8 I dont even bother. ( I do pixel peep though). Its probably my least favourite lens at the moment.. Looking to sell it for the Nikon Or wait and see if Nikon bring one out with VR..
Apr 9, 2015 05:49:15 #
Jake22 wrote:
I have a Nikon D7100 and am considering purchasing one of these two lenses. While looking under the "search" at this site , I noted a couple of comments that the Tamron was slow to focus. Also is the lack of VR on the Nikon a disadvantage? I would plan on keeping which ever lens I decide on for a very longtime. Is the extra money for the Nikon worth it? ( My gut tells me so).
Your thoughts folks and thanks.
Your thoughts folks and thanks.
Toss a coin - they are both great lenses - both focus well. Tamron is bigger, uses a larger filter, and weighs more I believe. Loss on resale might be higher. I just sold one of my 24-70 Nikkors for $1500 - exactly what I paid for it new a year ago - they are $1900 new. But you can find decent used ones between $1300 and $1500.
The other advantage of Nikkor over Tamron is future proofing. There is a good chance the Nikkor will work on any body produced by Nikon. Future compatibility with Tamron may require a trip to Tamron for a firmware upgrade, if it is available. Such is the fate with reverse-engineered lenses.
Apr 9, 2015 06:21:21 #
I bought the Tamron 24-70 for my D7100 and have no regrets. I also have the Tamron 10-24 and the 90mm macro. My other 3 lenses are all Sigmas. For me it was strictly a financial choice but I'm more than satisfied.
Apr 9, 2015 06:30:27 #
Matt Grainger, "Get your Gear Out" on youtube has a great article on Tamron vs. Nikon.
Like Gene stated, the Nikon will bring more in resale and will always work with Nikon camera's.
Like Gene stated, the Nikon will bring more in resale and will always work with Nikon camera's.
Apr 9, 2015 07:03:11 #
i love the tamron lenses i have ..they are equal if not better than my nikon lenses..try both on your camera and compare before you purchase..that would help you make the decision on how much you want to spend..
Apr 9, 2015 07:19:18 #
I bought the Nikon for my D300s and it has become my walk around lens. Heavy but tack sharp.
Up to date, the lack of VR has not been an issue. Focus is very fast, even in low light. No regrets at in paying the price difference as I can't fault the lens at all.
Up to date, the lack of VR has not been an issue. Focus is very fast, even in low light. No regrets at in paying the price difference as I can't fault the lens at all.
Apr 9, 2015 07:25:01 #
I have the Nikon 24-70 2.8 it is a wonderful lens, I keep this on my D810, I will be photographing Greyhounds running on the beach this weekend! I just Love this lens, I also own the Tameron 70-200mm2.8 and enjoy the quality of photos captured with that lens. Good Luck. If you go to my site.
Hightailphoto.com (Zenpholio) click on my favorite you can see what I captured with this lens.
Hightailphoto.com (Zenpholio) click on my favorite you can see what I captured with this lens.
Apr 9, 2015 07:46:01 #
I bought the Nikon version "gently used" from a fellow hogger last fall when I upgraded to my D610, and have not regretted it at all. It is a bit heavy but the images it greates are incredible. If price is your only consideration, you should also think about resale value. Used Nikkors hold their value much better than Tamrons or Sigmas, and good glass is a long term investment. I still use 40 year Nikkors and they work perfectly.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.