Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon24-70 2.8 vs Tamron 24-70 2.8
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Apr 8, 2015 10:56:07   #
Jake22 Loc: Portsmouth NH
 
I have a Nikon D7100 and am considering purchasing one of these two lenses. While looking under the "search" at this site , I noted a couple of comments that the Tamron was slow to focus. Also is the lack of VR on the Nikon a disadvantage? I would plan on keeping which ever lens I decide on for a very longtime. Is the extra money for the Nikon worth it? ( My gut tells me so).
Your thoughts folks and thanks.

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 11:11:38   #
oldtigger Loc: Roanoke Virginia-USA
 
Jake22 wrote:
I have a Nikon D7100 and am considering purchasing one of these two lenses. ... I noted a couple of comments that the Tamron was slow to focus. Also is the lack of VR on the Nikon a disadvantage? ... ...


i've used a tamron 24-70/2.8 for a year now.
Some reviews complain of focus speed or tendency to hunt in low light.
Using 2.8 lenses i have no problem with low light and have always considered focusing speed as very quick.

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 11:13:29   #
Jake22 Loc: Portsmouth NH
 
Thanks for your opinion.

Reply
 
 
Apr 8, 2015 11:17:23   #
jackm1943 Loc: Omaha, Nebraska
 
I doubt you would be disappointed with either lens. I have the Tamron and it is on my FF Canon 95% of the time. It is very heavy and appears to be very well constructed. I use it on a tripod mostly, but have used it for motorcycle and drag race competitions on servo and it has worked very well. It is very sharp also. I bought it mostly because of the good DPReview article.

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 11:24:24   #
Jake22 Loc: Portsmouth NH
 
I am familiar with the Nikon and am surprised to learn about the Tamron's weight. Am going to B&H this weekend, will check it out. Thanks.

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 11:24:27   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Jake22 wrote:
I have a Nikon D7100 and am considering purchasing one of these two lenses. While looking under the "search" at this site , I noted a couple of comments that the Tamron was slow to focus. Also is the lack of VR on the Nikon a disadvantage? I would plan on keeping which ever lens I decide on for a very longtime. Is the extra money for the Nikon worth it? ( My gut tells me so).
Your thoughts folks and thanks.

Take a look at these links -

http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/lenses
http://lenshero.com/lens-comparison
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx
http://www.lenstip.com/lenses.html
http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Compare

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 11:26:26   #
Greenguy33 Loc: Rhode Island
 
Jake22 wrote:
I have a Nikon D7100 and am considering purchasing one of these two lenses. While looking under the "search" at this site , I noted a couple of comments that the Tamron was slow to focus. Also is the lack of VR on the Nikon a disadvantage? I would plan on keeping which ever lens I decide on for a very longtime. Is the extra money for the Nikon worth it? ( My gut tells me so).
Your thoughts folks and thanks.


I bought my Tamron 24-70 based on a few things. First DxO Labs rates it higher than the Nikon 24-70. When a professional photographer/mentor told me he sold his Nikon 24-70 and 70-200 for the Tamron equivalents, that was enough for me to get the Tamron.
I took this photo last weekend with the Tamron 24-70mm.

Providence, RI
Providence, RI...
(Download)

Reply
 
 
Apr 8, 2015 11:27:27   #
Greenguy33 Loc: Rhode Island
 
Jake22 wrote:
I have a Nikon D7100 and am considering purchasing one of these two lenses. While looking under the "search" at this site , I noted a couple of comments that the Tamron was slow to focus. Also is the lack of VR on the Nikon a disadvantage? I would plan on keeping which ever lens I decide on for a very longtime. Is the extra money for the Nikon worth it? ( My gut tells me so).
Your thoughts folks and thanks.

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 11:28:33   #
Greenguy33 Loc: Rhode Island
 
Trying to delete the multiple posts without much luck. :cry:

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 11:28:58   #
Greenguy33 Loc: Rhode Island
 
[quote=Jake22]I have a Nikon D7100 and am considering purchasing one of these two lenses. While looking under the "search" at this site , I noted a couple of comments that the Tamron was slow to focus. Also is the lack of VR on the Nikon a disadvantage? I would plan on keeping which ever lens I decide on for a very longtime. Is the extra money for the Nikon worth it? ( My gut tells me so).

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 11:30:25   #
Greenguy33 Loc: Rhode Island
 
Sorry for the multiple posts.

Reply
 
 
Apr 8, 2015 11:32:34   #
Greenguy33 Loc: Rhode Island
 
I apologize for the multiple posts.
I don't know what happened.

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 11:35:04   #
Jake22 Loc: Portsmouth NH
 
Really nice photograph. Will read the review.

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 11:41:11   #
Jake22 Loc: Portsmouth NH
 
Thanks Jerry, I will do my home work :)

Reply
Apr 8, 2015 11:43:06   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Greenguy33 wrote:
I bought my Tamron 24-70 based on a few things. First DxO Labs rates it higher than the Nikon 24-70. When a professional photographer/mentor told me he sold his Nikon 24-70 and 70-200 for the Tamron equivalents, that was enough for me to get the Tamron.
I took this photo last weekend with the Tamron 24-70mm.

Beautiful!

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.