Nikon Advertising
Mar 9, 2015 16:45:15 #
RWR
Loc: La Mesa, CA
mdorn wrote:
... I have a hard time believing a Nikon owner would want to be misconstrued as a Canon fanboy.
Some of us have real matters to concern ourselves with. :)
Mar 9, 2015 21:53:11 #
SharpShooter wrote:
Y-O-U......R-A-N-G-G-G !! :lol: :lol:
SS
SS
I'm so glad some things in this life are consistent. I applaud your persistence, SS. Always a joy to see the give and take with you involved.
Mar 10, 2015 05:55:24 #
mdorn wrote:
Thank goodness... Which Nikon lenses are white? Just curious.
Nikon made a series of AFS II lenses - 24-70, 70-200, 200 F2, 300 F2.8, 400 F2.8, 500 F4 and 600 F4.
I have the 600mm. It's a real conversation piece when I go somewhere and the Canon guys ask how much it cost me to modify the lens/camera, and do I lose AF.
Mar 10, 2015 06:18:37 #
could be a joke" how many canon users dos it take,to be as good as one Nikon shooter"
Mar 10, 2015 06:19:29 #
Mar 10, 2015 06:20:26 #
heyjoe wrote:
could be a joke" how many canon users dos it take,to be as good as one Nikon shooter"
Or "Wearing a Nikon ad on a jacket does not a photographer make."
Mar 10, 2015 06:56:49 #
The event furnished photo vests to press photographers. Obviously, Nikon paid for advertising on the vests. It does not mean they were all using Nikon gear. Kodak used to do the same.
Mar 10, 2015 07:28:11 #
You are missing the point . . .in many venues, you must have an officially issued photo vest to access restricted areas not open to the general public. Who ever issues the vests for the event (which are collected at the end of the event) doesn't care what type of camera you shoot, but that you have a vest that can be easily seen and identified. It appears in this example that Nikon has sponsored the photo vests for the event.
Mar 10, 2015 07:29:15 #
OddJobber wrote:
The Nikon lenses are "light gray". They're typically long tele's, 300, 400, 500mm, and hard to find.
Especially in snow or fog. :D
Mar 10, 2015 07:29:48 #
Nikonbob wrote:
The event furnished photo vests to press photographers. Obviously, Nikon paid for advertising on the vests. It does not mean they were all using Nikon gear. Kodak used to do the same.
:thumbup:
Mar 10, 2015 07:30:55 #
Mar 10, 2015 07:37:26 #
Hi Mark. It is just a bunch of Canon guys that want to be Nikon guys.:):). They could only afford the vests!:):)
mdorn wrote:
I'm a little confused with this image... Can someone help me out? :-)
Mar 10, 2015 10:22:18 #
Erv wrote:
Hi Mark. It is just a bunch of Canon guys that want to be Nikon guys.:):). They could only afford the vests!:):)
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Mar 10, 2015 10:42:44 #
Mar 10, 2015 10:58:47 #
mdorn wrote:
I'm a little confused with this image... Can someone help me out? :-)
Maybe vests were like press passes, badges? And Nikon paid for advert?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.