Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Minolta Lens on Sony A series (APS-C) Cameras?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Feb 20, 2015 23:42:07   #
JimH123 Loc: Morgan Hill, CA
 
cntry wrote:
I'm on my 4th, also the A77II...I love this camera and every time I use it, I love it more!


I'm now on my 5th Sony. The A100 (my daughter now posts an endless supply of facebook pictures with it), the A55, the A57, the A99. And now the A6000, my first e-mount. Haven't done much with it since it just arrived and its dark outside. But a couple pictures taken in the house uploaded to Lightroom and then processed by DXO show that everything is being recognized.

I will be testing it with the Tamron 150-600mm also. I got the LA-EA4 adapter. Also did some test shots with a couple Minolta AF lenses. No problems with that. Also bought an el cheapo adapter for my manually focusing M42 lenses. I did try, in the house, a Canon FD mount lens with an adapter with no correcting lens and it had no problem there either. Tomorrow is supposed to be sunny, so should be a good day.

Reply
Feb 21, 2015 00:00:00   #
cucharared Loc: Texas, Colorado
 
JimH123 wrote:
I'm now on my 5th Sony...everything is being recognized.

I will be testing it with the Tamron 150-600mm also. I got the LA-EA4 adapter. Also did some test shots with a couple Minolta AF lenses. No problems with that. ... Tomorrow is supposed to be sunny, so should be a good day.


Personally, I'm looking forward to a report on your experiences with the A6000, LA-EA4, and Tamron 150-600mm. You did say you'd do that didn't you (in an earlier post of mine)?

Reply
Feb 21, 2015 01:32:57   #
JimH123 Loc: Morgan Hill, CA
 
cucharared wrote:
Personally, I'm looking forward to a report on your experiences with the A6000, LA-EA4, and Tamron 150-600mm. You did say you'd do that didn't you (in an earlier post of mine)?


Yes I did. I have all 3 items. And I plan to test them tomorrow.

I have the Sony A57 (crop sensor) and A99 (full sensor) to compare with as well.

Reply
 
 
Feb 21, 2015 12:21:28   #
lovitlots Loc: Tottenham, Ontario, Canada
 
Solo1805 wrote:
I just did this exact thing one month ago. Couldn't be happier I purchased a Sony a55, Minolta 28-80 and a 100-300 lens from Roberts Camera in Indianapolis for about $340. all were in Excellent or Very Good condition. I am already considering upgrading the lenses I am so pleased with the camera. The stabilization is on the sensor, but those with more experience can give feedback on that. The only drawback so far is getting a shoe mount flash. The hotshoe is not Canon/Nikon compatible and the Sony flashes are expensive.
Hope that helps!
I just did this exact thing one month ago. Couldn'... (show quote)

I have two Minolta A lenses for my a57 and a77. Both work flawlessly and I was able to set them up on the A77 with the micro focus adjust. I have the 50 1.8 and the 35-105 macro with the switch. Both have excellent image quality. As for the the flash I use a Nissen 866 and am planning to buy a Metz 64. They're compatible with Sony and work well. My only complaint about the Sony cameras is it is difficult to find 3rd party products that are compatible. I guess that is not Sony's fault but the 3rd party companies. But I struggle on in that sense and I do eventually find what I'm looking for. When you buy the Minolta lenses do through search of reviews, people personal opinions and pictures posted on Flickr and other such sites. All that info should help you make the right decisions.

Reply
Feb 21, 2015 15:58:03   #
JimH123 Loc: Morgan Hill, CA
 
cucharared wrote:
Personally, I'm looking forward to a report on your experiences with the A6000, LA-EA4, and Tamron 150-600mm. You did say you'd do that didn't you (in an earlier post of mine)?


If you look for my post this morning, you will see my experience using the A6000 with the Tamron 150-600. To summarize, it worked good. I really couldn't tell any difference to shooting with my A57. I suspect that perhaps the A99 was just a bit faster, but I have no way of measuring it, so maybe it is a bit faster, or it was my imagination, couldn't tell. I put it in burst mode and in a fraction of a second, I had 6 RAW images. And all stayed in focus.

Reply
Feb 22, 2015 12:28:10   #
cucharared Loc: Texas, Colorado
 
JimH123 wrote:
If you look for my post this morning, you will see my experience using the A6000 with the Tamron 150-600. To summarize, it worked good. I really couldn't tell any difference to shooting with my A57. I suspect that perhaps the A99 was just a bit faster, but I have no way of measuring it, so maybe it is a bit faster, or it was my imagination, couldn't tell. I put it in burst mode and in a fraction of a second, I had 6 RAW images. And all stayed in focus.


All good to know. Glad we have you pioneers to check things out before we make a commitment. Thanks again.
ron

Reply
Feb 23, 2015 14:18:15   #
wj cody Loc: springfield illinois
 
machia wrote:
After reading this entire blog I see that Sony did in fact use the Minolta in-camera stabilization system which is great news for you using the non-stabilized
Minolta lenses.
And I see after reading more carefully that you're new to Minolta ! They built lenses for Leica, and even had better quality control than Leica themselves !
Great glass, good luck.


the relationship between leica and minolta goes back to the late 1960s. minolta was the only camera manufacturer, with the notable exception of zeiss, that made their own glass. note that i say glass and not lenses. for e leitz' slr cameras, they went to minolta for the lens glass and built the lens bodies around the lens elements. the minolta rokkor 16mm f2.8 lens, for instance, is superlative and not bettered by anything out there today. all the rokkor wide angles, with the exception of the 18mm f9 (which was bettered by the 17mm f4) lens, remain today as gems and are priced accordingly. in the telephoto world, the minolta 100mm f2 lens provides results as good as my 100mm f3.5 zeiss planar on my hasselblad. i still have an xk minolta body and a select group of lenses which perform wonderfully. and don't forget the 85mm f1:1.7, as good as nikon's current 85mm f1:1.4. for mirror lenses, the 250mm f5.6 simply cannot be beat, either.
so have fun, searching out the rokkors!

Reply
 
 
Feb 23, 2015 14:36:48   #
JimH123 Loc: Morgan Hill, CA
 
wj cody wrote:
the relationship between leica and minolta goes back to the late 1960s. minolta was the only camera manufacturer, with the notable exception of zeiss, that made their own glass. note that i say glass and not lenses. for e leitz' slr cameras, they went to minolta for the lens glass and built the lens bodies around the lens elements. the minolta rokkor 16mm f2.8 lens, for instance, is superlative and not bettered by anything out there today. all the rokkor wide angles, with the exception of the 18mm f9 (which was bettered by the 17mm f4) lens, remain today as gems and are priced accordingly. in the telephoto world, the minolta 100mm f2 lens provides results as good as my 100mm f3.5 zeiss planar on my hasselblad. i still have an xk minolta body and a select group of lenses which perform wonderfully. and don't forget the 85mm f1:1.7, as good as nikon's current 85mm f1:1.4. for mirror lenses, the 250mm f5.6 simply cannot be beat, either.
so have fun, searching out the rokkors!
the relationship between leica and minolta goes ba... (show quote)


Good information to know. I am certainly enjoying my Rokkor 50mm F1.4. Even when shooting at F1.4.

Reply
Feb 23, 2015 14:56:23   #
wj cody Loc: springfield illinois
 
JimH123 wrote:
Good information to know. I am certainly enjoying my Rokkor 50mm F1.4. Even when shooting at F1.4.


you betcha!!!

Reply
Feb 24, 2015 08:44:44   #
loperR Loc: Medina ,Ohio
 
I have lenses from a Minolta 102 non auto focus but at the time they we're the top of line lenses ; Is there a Sony Digital that would use this mount?

Reply
Feb 24, 2015 08:57:02   #
Davethehiker Loc: South West Pennsylvania
 
loperR wrote:
I have lenses from a Minolta 102 non auto focus but at the time they we're the top of line lenses ; Is there a Sony Digital that would use this mount?


One the adapters on this page will work.
http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=minolta+lens+adapter
Then you will need an E-Mount camera. They come as cropped sensor starting at $179.99 or much more expensive full frame.

Short answer "Yes".

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.