bet she or he is really holdin thier head as girl in chair depict in avitar.

An astonishingly good exhibition at Arles 2011 was of very large gum bichromates of hard core pornography at Coffee Socks. If you'd asked me, I'd have said it was almost impossible to create fine art from hard core pornography (and this WAS hard core -- one young woman entertaining two men simultaneously, for example), but they did it.

Was anyone 'depraved or corrupted' by it (the classic test of pornography under English law)? Probably not. Would I want a 12-year-old to see it? Again, probably not (though at least one did while I was there).

Have you ever noticed, though, how no-one ever admits that THEY were depraved and corrupted by something. They're always worried that someone else might be. Someone stupider or more lustful than they, presumably. I am distressingly often surprised by those to think that their own morality, whatever it is, should AUTOMATICALLY apply to EVERYONE. That's Taliban thinking...

Cheers,

R.

An astonishingly good exhibition at Arles 2011 was of very large gum bichromates of hard core pornography at Coffee Socks. If you'd asked me, I'd have said it was almost impossible to create fine art from hard core pornography (and this WAS hard core -- one young woman entertaining two men simultaneously, for example), but they did it.

Was anyone 'depraved or corrupted' by it (the classic test of pornography under English law)? Probably not. Would I want a 12-year-old to see it? Again, probably not (though at least one did while I was there).

Have you ever noticed, though, how no-one ever admits that THEY were depraved and corrupted by something. They're always worried that someone else might be. Someone stupider or more lustful than they, presumably. I am distressingly often surprised by those to think that their own morality, whatever it is, should AUTOMATICALLY apply to EVERYONE. That's Taliban thinking...

Cheers,

R.

Ummm no Archy my pal, soft and hard porn are just that, soft and hard porn. What was shown on here were nothing more than images you will see in the windows of shops in any Mall like Victoria's secret or some of the teen magazines on the racks or in Vogue fashion magazine etc.

In fact Victoria's Secret or for that matter the swim suit edition of Sports Illustrated have more flesh showing images than anything that was in discussion on here.

So don't tell others what they think is soft or hard porn, instead tell us what YOU think is soft and hard porn, that would be more to the point my friend. Since you've bothered to chime in here and tell us what other people think something is, why don't you tell us what you think the category of the images should be classed as, that are in the swim suit edition of Sport Illustrated and those poster found in the windows of Victoria's Secret or any other women lingerie shops in Malls?

I think we would ALL like to know that, but I suspect you are now to shy to tell us what you think of such images. Surprise us, please!