Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
camera mode.
Page <prev 2 of 2
Nov 20, 2014 07:16:51   #
Gary Truchelut Loc: Coldspring, TX
 
IS does seem to slow focus acquisition so I don't use it much for birds. As a matter of fact my best bird lens doesn't have IS. I use a fairly high shutter speed to compensate for motion.

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 07:48:06   #
dugole Loc: Matawan, New Jersey
 
Delderby wrote:
"no IS" - is that when your using a tripod? or is there another good reason? (I rarely shoot birds) :)

I've just read Gene's post - didn't really think about that before.


Gene is pretty much correct. IS conflicts with the panning motion - in a sense panning movement is interpreted as camera shake.

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 08:24:05   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
Delderby wrote:
"no IS" - is that when your using a tripod? or is there another good reason? (I rarely shoot birds) :)

I've just read Gene's post - didn't really think about that before.


At the necessary shutter speeds it is not really needed and adds another process that slows you down.

Reply
 
 
Nov 20, 2014 08:25:47   #
Delderby Loc: Derby UK
 
dsmeltz wrote:
At the necessary shutter speeds it is not really needed and adds another process that slows you down.


Understood - thanks :-)

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 08:27:25   #
Delderby Loc: Derby UK
 
Gary Truchelut wrote:
IS does seem to slow focus acquisition so I don't use it much for birds. As a matter of fact my best bird lens doesn't have IS. I use a fairly high shutter speed to compensate for motion.


Thanks :-)

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 08:28:17   #
Delderby Loc: Derby UK
 
dugole wrote:
Gene is pretty much correct. IS conflicts with the panning motion - in a sense panning movement is interpreted as camera shake.


Thanks :-)

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 09:05:27   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
Delderby wrote:
"no IS" - is that when your using a tripod? or is there another good reason? (I rarely shoot birds) :)

I've just read Gene's post - didn't really think about that before.


I would leave IS off for anything that is moving - on or off the tripod. YOu will be fighting your lens otherwise - you try to compose so you move the camera, but the camera doesn't know what you are doing - so it tries to compensate - and so it goes. Besides, IS is only effective at lower shutter speeds and with shorter focal lengths and non-moving subjects.

Reply
 
 
Nov 20, 2014 10:03:07   #
Delderby Loc: Derby UK
 
Gene51 wrote:
I would leave IS off for anything that is moving - on or off the tripod. YOu will be fighting your lens otherwise - you try to compose so you move the camera, but the camera doesn't know what you are doing - so it tries to compensate - and so it goes. Besides, IS is only effective at lower shutter speeds and with shorter focal lengths and non-moving subjects.


I shall switch IS off and see how I get on - keeping shutter speed up, of course! :-)

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 10:26:10   #
wishiwasfishing Loc: texas
 
thanks everyone!I need all the help i can get.But I never had a hobby i enjoyed so much.

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 14:23:34   #
rleonetti Loc: Portland, Oregon
 
What is "IS" short for?

Reply
Nov 20, 2014 15:28:40   #
wishiwasfishing Loc: texas
 
image stabalization

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.