Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Canon? Which camera is the best bang for the buck? $1000+
Page <<first <prev 4 of 7 next> last>>
Oct 4, 2014 10:53:36   #
pithydoug Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
 
ralphc4176 wrote:
For my money, it's the EOS 5D Mk II. I am partial to full-frame (24 x 36 mm) image sensors. I have taken pictures with other cameras, including those with full-frame image sensors, and the images from the 5D are always the best of any I have shot. The disadvantage is that the lenses for full-frame cameras cost more. I try to keep in mind two old adages: "You get what you pay for" and "The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten."
For my money, it's the EOS 5D Mk II. I am partial... (show quote)


While I agree with you about the 5D(I have one), when the OP said $1000+ I did not get the feeling he wanted to sell his wife and kids and take out a second mortage. That's a big leap in the grand plus! ;)

Reply
Oct 4, 2014 11:03:48   #
oldtool2 Loc: South Jersey
 
Hohoho wrote:
Here's the dealio...

I WANT to travel and be the next "Art Wolfe!"

HOWEVER... I'm sure his cameras are better than these we are talking about. And, he might have a bit more training and knowledge. ;-)

I love photography and would like to become semi-pro instead of where I am right now.

I don't want anything with a HUGE learning curve. :-/ I have quite a bit of current knowledge and an intuitively good "eye." (The other eye, how you say, not so much!)

I bought a Nikon D7100 and took it to Yellowstone, but I still have daydreams of my Canon past and think maybe I just need to get a Canon to satisfy the itch, so to speak.

So... That's where I sit.

I'm looking for great clean still shots, pretty decent video. Probably not shooting for the next national geographic movie. (Darn!)

I shoot Wildlife. Scenery. Mountain tops. Informal people shots, not real portraiture. Some Action. And a reasonable learning curve.

Which leads me to -- should I keep the Nikon D7100 or satisfy my Canon hankering? And, if so... Which one?

Thanks Y'all!
Here's the dealio... br br I WANT to travel and b... (show quote)


Looks to me you have two choices. In an APS-C camera the new 7D II which really looks great and not badly priced, $1799.00. For a FF camera the 5D III would be my choice.

Jim D

Reply
Oct 4, 2014 11:06:51   #
RICARDOOO Loc: Findlay, Ohio
 
Hohoho wrote:
Hey! I love you guys!

Canon? Which camera is the best bang for the buck? $1000+

Xxoo



The answer depends on YOUR wants and needs.!!!

Reply
 
 
Oct 4, 2014 11:19:36   #
Reinaldokool Loc: San Rafael, CA
 
MaryRenee wrote:
I have started photography school and own a Nikon 7100. It seems to be a good camera. Is it better than Canon?


Of course. :mrgreen: :roll: (Sorry, the devil made me.)

Reply
Oct 4, 2014 11:21:16   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
Ah, the "good ol' days," when 35mm was king and cameras were manual all the way. You had 3 selections--shutter or aperture priority, and bulb. So, focus, set your exposure, and shoot. What really mattered was the photographer's eye for a picture, and brand preference was whatever you preferred for whatever reason. These days, cameras are digital and so specialized that it's become like motorcycles--there's one for every conceivable intended use. No more "one size fits all" it seems. So the important thing is to go with the camera that most fits your needs, and get good glass, as no matter how good a camera may be, it's the glass that makes the difference in the quality of a photo. Then there's the photog's eye, of course.

My recommendation is to go with Canon, if that is what you truly want, and get the one that is the most "jack of all trades" so to speak. You list a wide variety of types of photography, so you may find you'll need more than one camera to suit your purposes.

Reply
Oct 4, 2014 11:36:02   #
RICARDOOO Loc: Findlay, Ohio
 
Reinaldokool wrote:
Of course. :mrgreen: :roll: (Sorry, the devil made me.)



It is!!! . . . (for now)

Reply
Oct 4, 2014 11:44:49   #
dhellner Loc: milwaukee wi.
 
I do not know anything about cannon but there is little support from cosco.My advice would be to call M/T shooter and buy from him since any advice you get from him is pricless and helpfull down the road.

Reply
 
 
Oct 4, 2014 12:03:10   #
Bill Emmett Loc: Bow, New Hampshire
 
Personally, I think you should look into a original Canon 7D. You can get a new one, still on the shelf, or a Canon refurbished model and save real money. From what I've seen in this forum, many of the members suggest the latest greatest, with no regard for you wallet. The original 7D is a great camera, but is now out of production, since the arrival of the 7D mark II. Keep in mind the 7D has been the work horse for all the pro's who shoot wild life, sports, and other action subjects, since it was put on the market. I've also used it to photograph landscapes, scenery and portraits. Originally, the 7D was considered a professional body, made of metal, and really rugged. It is a crop sensor camera, so it will mount any lens Canon makes, from the EF-S line, to the widely acclaimed "L" quality glass. Focus is fast enough, the frame rate for burst shooting is 7 f/sec. The learning curve is low, but it does have many bells and whistles for you to experiment with, other than standard shooting. The 7D Mark 2, is so new no one has had one in their hand, unless they were selected by Canon to review the camera. Just about everything on the new 7D II is new technology, untested, and untried by the public. As a semi-pro, I would not take the new 7D Mark II into the field, or on a important shoot, as my only camera.

Keep in mind, the original 7D can be bought for about $800. The new 7D II is priced at $1799.00. For the difference in price you can buy a nice "L" quality lens, or some nice EF-S lenses, to go with your 7D. Don't forget KEH.Com, they sell fully tested used lenses, with a warranty. When they grade a lens, their method is conservative, so you get a better lens than you'll expect, for far less money than new. In any event, enjoy your new camera, whatever you decide.

Reply
Oct 4, 2014 12:30:25   #
Shutterbugsailer Loc: Staten Island NY (AKA Cincinnati by the Sea)
 
Hohoho wrote:
Hey! I love you guys!

Canon? Which camera is the best bang for the buck? $1000+

Xxoo


Look at the Canon EOS 7D at BH photo with an 18-135 lens. A two year old model but water/dust resistant and very highly rated

Reply
Oct 4, 2014 12:39:08   #
Shutterbugsailer Loc: Staten Island NY (AKA Cincinnati by the Sea)
 
Shutterbugsailer wrote:
Look at the Canon EOS 7D at BH photo with an 18-135 lens. A two year old model but water/dust resistant and very highly rated


I was a bit off on this post. That model was introduced in 2009. Still available and you will get better build quality than a newer model at the same price point, but it is well on its way to becoming a "Dinosaur"

Reply
Oct 4, 2014 12:50:34   #
wecole Loc: Bayside, California
 
C Checked your blog - great photos. I have a 7D and would like to know the lens you use for your great photos.

I have a variety of lenses from telephotos to primes. Your photos are extremely sharp. Advice?

Reply
 
 
Oct 4, 2014 13:16:50   #
Dutzie Loc: I'd like to know
 
Sounds like a 7D MII to me..

Reply
Oct 4, 2014 13:19:46   #
Beercat Loc: Central Coast of California
 
The right camera, based on the criteria of the OP, is the Canon 70D.

However, do not buy the package at Costco as the lenses in the box are not the best kit lenses for the 70D.

The EF-S 18-135 STM is the best kit lens for the Canon 70D.

I have 2 Canon 70D's, love them but I shoot both video and stills and for that reason I choose the 70D over a 7D or going full frame to the 6D.

I will buy a 6D in the future but it will be my stills work horse and I'll keep using the 70D for video and a second body for stills.

Reply
Oct 4, 2014 13:32:06   #
ebbote Loc: Hockley, Texas
 
Right now the Nikon D750 is at the very top of the heap.

Hohoho wrote:
Here's the dealio...

I WANT to travel and be the next "Art Wolfe!"

HOWEVER... I'm sure his cameras are better than these we are talking about. And, he might have a bit more training and knowledge. ;-)

I love photography and would like to become semi-pro instead of where I am right now.

I don't want anything with a HUGE learning curve. :-/ I have quite a bit of current knowledge and an intuitively good "eye." (The other eye, how you say, not so much!)

I bought a Nikon D7100 and took it to Yellowstone, but I still have daydreams of my Canon past and think maybe I just need to get a Canon to satisfy the itch, so to speak.

So... That's where I sit.

I'm looking for great clean still shots, pretty decent video. Probably not shooting for the next national geographic movie. (Darn!)

I shoot Wildlife. Scenery. Mountain tops. Informal people shots, not real portraiture. Some Action. And a reasonable learning curve.

Which leads me to -- should I keep the Nikon D7100 or satisfy my Canon hankering? And, if so... Which one?

Thanks Y'all!
Here's the dealio... br br I WANT to travel and b... (show quote)

Reply
Oct 4, 2014 14:51:00   #
jimmya Loc: Phoenix
 
Hohoho wrote:
Hey! I love you guys!

Canon? Which camera is the best bang for the buck? $1000+

Xxoo


Others will disagree but for me it's the t3i. I own one, an excellent camera for both video (with external audio) and stills. A steal at $600 or less.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.