Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
canon vs: nikon
Page <<first <prev 6 of 9 next> last>>
Aug 23, 2014 12:15:29   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
Morning Star wrote:
Kojak, welcome to the Hog!

Unfortunately, you started with a topic that has been discussed many times before, and really does not have an answer.
It's like asking what is the better car, a Chevvy or a Pontiac?

If you asked this question because you are considering buying a new camera, my first suggestion would be to go to a camera shop (NOT a big box store), and ask the staff about different models and brandnames.
If there is no camera store near you, there are a number of websites where you can find out the specs for specific cameras, and also compare several different cameras.
My favourite one is http://www.dpreview.com

BTW, my personal preference would be neither, it is Olympus!
Kojak, welcome to the Hog! br br Unfortunately, y... (show quote)


Good answer, and I agree. A good camera shop, run by pros, not a chain store with part time help that only wants to sell you a camera. They will tell you whatever one you're interested in is the best one. A good pro shop will assist you knowledgeably.

When you ask, ask about the strengths and weaknesses of each, decide which way you lean in photography, and go with the one that fits your needs the best. Then take time to learn the camera. It won't be a quick & easy learning session, either. Takes time and using the camera a lot, until you are thoroughly familiar with it and using it become instinctual.

In the end, this subject has been beaten thoroughly, so you won't get any definitive answers here. Both brands are excellent, but users/fans are polarized, so a subjective answer here may be elusive. You can't go wrong with either. Again, just go to a good camera store and ask questions to help you make up your mind which way to go. Good luck and happy hunting.

Reply
Aug 23, 2014 12:16:55   #
BigWahoo Loc: Kentucky
 
Brian45 wrote:
How to rate Canon vs Nikon - very difficult. If you threw Fuji x series into the mix, I'd go for the Fuji.




agree

Reply
Aug 23, 2014 12:19:49   #
yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon
 
Regis wrote:
They are both great cameras. There are no important differences.


Compare the D800E or D810 to anything Canon...

Reply
 
 
Aug 23, 2014 12:24:43   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
Canon optimised their lensmount for size and full electronic control in 1987 and optimised auto focus for speed and sccuracy by putting the focus motors in the lenses also in 1987. Nikon is a johnny come lately in this regard. Currently, Nikon does have an edge in sensor performance.

Reply
Aug 23, 2014 12:40:36   #
travelwp Loc: New Jersey
 
kojak60 wrote:
please rate differences


The rating differences are exactly the same as Ford vs Chevy.

Reply
Aug 23, 2014 12:44:49   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
buenaventura43 wrote:
Let me hop in the boat. I pick nikon after extensive reading canon vs nikon in this forum period.


And I picked Canon, period.

Reply
Aug 23, 2014 12:47:15   #
mborn Loc: Massachusetts
 
We can beat this subject to death up for the next 10 years and every one of us has our own opinion, and like it has been said, the best thing for the O P to do is to get somewhere where we can try out the different cameras and find out what will work best for him/her

Reply
 
 
Aug 23, 2014 12:49:09   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
yhtomit wrote:
Compare the D800E or D810 to anything Canon...


Since the Canon 5D IV is coming out early next year, it may be a game changer. While the D800 has a somewhat better, and much higher resolution sensor, a sensor alone doesn't make a camera. The cameras flip flop as new offerings from each vendor come out. And, if the OP is not interested in the D810, than your argument is somewhat moot.

Reply
Aug 23, 2014 12:51:17   #
travelwp Loc: New Jersey
 
mborn wrote:
We can beat this subject to death up for the next 10 years


Did you notice that the 'canon vs nikon' troll was IN HIDING?

Reply
Aug 23, 2014 12:51:35   #
JDVan Loc: Near Seattle
 
I went through this in detail when I selected the Nikon D80 vs the equivalent Canon. The Canon was a little less expensive. But one of the final determinants for me was how the camera fit my hand. The canon was too small for my hand size and large long fingers. A lot of parameters have to be included in the decision process. I was very happy with the Nikon D80 for many years. Until it got dropped, camera and lens, on to asphalt. @#$%^&* It has now been replaced by a Nikon D7100 but would still like to try to repair the D80 if the cost isn't completely out of line.

Reply
Aug 23, 2014 13:06:07   #
lowkick Loc: Connecticut
 
kojak60 wrote:
please rate differences


Both are great cameras. You cannot rate one brand vs. another, though. You need to compare each brand's model vs. the other brand's similar model. In the end, it doesn't matter which brand you buy, but which model best suits your needs.

Reply
 
 
Aug 23, 2014 13:13:31   #
amfoto1 Loc: San Jose, Calif. USA
 
David Kay wrote:
no, Minolta or Sony. LOL


No... Minolta is now Sony.

So the correct answer is... Sony, Pentax, Sigma, Leica, Olympus.
:roll:

OP, this question is asked a lot... a whole lot!

Answer is that either Canon or Nikon can do you proud, used right. In fact any of the camera brands can do so. Do a search here and elsewhere for reviews of any specific models you are considering.

Lenses are more important than the camera they are used upon. Lenses have more to do with the quality of your images and your ability to capture the images you want. Most cameras today are very high quality and full featured. Some are more durably built (pro-oriented, some might say), while others may be more plasticky (more entry level, affordable & lighter weight). Each manufacturer makes various quality grades and you'll some variation in features... but with today's cameras you don't have to worry very much about image quality itself.

Go to a store to handle and play around with the camera models you're considering. Likely one will "feel" better to you, will just seem to make more sense where it's controls are located, etc. That may be the better choice for you.
Then consider other things, such as the full system that's available and how well that meets your needs. Not only consider the manufacturer's own offerings, also look at what third party manufacturers offer for use with it.

Reply
Aug 23, 2014 13:20:48   #
amfoto1 Loc: San Jose, Calif. USA
 
RichardSM wrote:
Canon EF L lenses are all built in Japan.


No wonder they are so over-priced! :lol:

Reply
Aug 23, 2014 13:28:16   #
skiman Loc: Ventura, CA
 
kojak60 wrote:
please rate differences

Everybody is just so wishy washy on this subject, they are the same, both make great cameras, use search, look at the review at this link, etc. the op wants us to rate the difference. So here you go:
The difference is 49 to 51 percent different.

Reply
Aug 23, 2014 13:31:25   #
davidp5255
 
perfect answer

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.