St Louis Police Busted On Tape For Falsely Claiming Killed Suspect Charged Them
Aug 23, 2014 12:41:11 #
dirtpusher wrote:
ole gmcase got backed into a corner... now just avoiding the question. but he right can't get any where with people like that.. lol :roll: :roll: :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Your lack of cogent thought and discernment even exceeds your atrocious spelling and incoherent sentences. But good luck and I wish you better times ahead.
Aug 23, 2014 12:42:29 #
NeilL
Loc: British-born Canadian
gmcase wrote:
Your lack of cogent thought and discernment even exceeds your atrocious grammar and sometimes incoherent sentences. But good luck and I wish you better times ahead.
What can we say? He's a liberal. You need to put it in pictures for him.
Aug 23, 2014 12:43:21 #
JDVan
Loc: Near Seattle
dljen wrote:
I'd say itchy trigger fingers, these cops have to be stopped. They'd never shoot to kill a white person for a crime under $5.00. Disgraceful on their part, this isn't the Wild West. :-(
I think you need to step back from this a little and make sure you have all the facts straight before you let your emotions trample all over good logic. A very minor part of your argument that is totally wrong is the $5 crime reference. If you were to do your research you would find there was much more value stolen than $5 and a physical confrontation that is the large part of the crime. Look at the suspects rap sheet. It is a long ways from being lilly white!.
Aug 23, 2014 12:43:27 #
gmcase wrote:
Your lack of cogent thought and discernment even exceeds your atrocious spelling and incoherent sentences. But good luck and I wish you better times ahead.
run gomer RUN :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Aug 23, 2014 12:48:38 #
jkaye65 wrote:
Since you seem to be so brilliant, maybe you can enlighten us as to how the police officer's eye socket was broken.
I agree with your comment! What I want to know is why did the police not tell the media, looters etc this information immediately? It would have calmed the situation a little bit. The injured cop had to go to the hospital the same day, but this critical information was withheld, why?
Aug 23, 2014 12:50:18 #
NeilL wrote:
What can we say? He's a liberal. You need to put it in pictures for him.
he trying to reenact his hero.... he kinda reminds me of
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irMeHmlxE9s
Aug 23, 2014 12:52:34 #
greymule wrote:
What the f is wrong with you two guys. Calm yourse... (show quote)
For one thing ... Body armor will NOT stop a knife. Police are trained to shoot "center of mass". A shot to the leg will result to "thru and thru" and could end up striking an innocent bystander.
Aug 23, 2014 12:53:26 #
travelwp wrote:
I agree with your comment! What I want to know is why did the police not tell the media, looters etc this information immediately? It would have calmed the situation a little bit. The injured cop had to go to the hospital the same day, but this critical information was withheld, why?
they proved that eye socket story. bs
Aug 23, 2014 12:53:31 #
Three things were obvious to me watching this video:
1. The thug had a weapon.
2. The armed thug turned toward and was rapidly approaching a police officer with the weapon.
3. The armed thug will no longer be a threat to society.
It is the dead armed thug who was the "dummy" not the police officers.
Thanks for posting the video Dirtpusher. :thumbup:
1. The thug had a weapon.
2. The armed thug turned toward and was rapidly approaching a police officer with the weapon.
3. The armed thug will no longer be a threat to society.
It is the dead armed thug who was the "dummy" not the police officers.
Thanks for posting the video Dirtpusher. :thumbup:
Aug 23, 2014 12:54:45 #
Black Bart
Loc: Indiana
travelwp wrote:
I agree with your comment! What I want to know is why did the police not tell the media, looters etc this information immediately? It would have calmed the situation a little bit. The injured cop had to go to the hospital the same day, but this critical information was withheld, why?
EVER HEAR OF HEPA LAW
Aug 23, 2014 12:55:06 #
Bmac wrote:
Three things were obvious to me watching this video:
1. The thug had a weapon.
2. The armed thug turned toward and was rapidly approaching a police officer with the weapon.
3. The armed thug will no longer be a threat to society.
It is the dead armed thug who was the "dummy" not the police officers.
Thanks for posting the video Dirtpusher. :thumbup:
1. The thug had a weapon.
2. The armed thug turned toward and was rapidly approaching a police officer with the weapon.
3. The armed thug will no longer be a threat to society.
It is the dead armed thug who was the "dummy" not the police officers.
Thanks for posting the video Dirtpusher. :thumbup:
you wlcome :mrgreen:
Aug 23, 2014 12:58:32 #
Black Bart wrote:
EVER HEAR OF HEPA LAW
Are you referring to the HIPAA Law involving patient privacy?
Aug 23, 2014 13:02:13 #
Black Bart wrote:
EVER HEAR OF HEPA LAW
Are you suggesting that the injured cop did not give permission to release this information ?
Aug 23, 2014 13:04:23 #
Black Bart
Loc: Indiana
travelwp wrote:
Are you suggesting that the injured cop did not give permission to release this information ?
I don't know DO YOU.
Aug 23, 2014 13:04:43 #
NeilL
Loc: British-born Canadian
travelwp wrote:
I agree with your comment! What I want to know is why did the police not tell the media, looters etc this information immediately? It would have calmed the situation a little bit. The injured cop had to go to the hospital the same day, but this critical information was withheld, why?
Perhaps the press is withholding this info for their own nefarious reasons.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.