Check This Out: Evolution Refuted
Jul 31, 2014 08:53:19 #
djenrette wrote:
And I suppose the earth is flat as well ...
Of course it"s flat. Just go to the beach. The horizon is dead level. If the Earth were round all the water would fall off. Moreover the Earth is motionless. Can you feel it move? If it were spinning you fall over or fall off completely. When you drive down the road you can't even prove that you are moving or that the road is moving toward you. You can't prove that I can't fly.
Jul 31, 2014 09:28:40 #
user47602
Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32
sb wrote:
He starts off being ignorant in his first sentence... (show quote)
He also somehow forgot about sex... sex can create new combinations of DNA not in existence before :duh:
Jul 31, 2014 13:31:27 #
Liberals on the Hog prove the existence of evolution: they continue to get dumber by the day!!
Liberalism is a disease - the only cure is common sense
Liberalism is a disease - the only cure is common sense
Jul 31, 2014 13:39:10 #
HEART wrote:
Liberals on the Hog prove the existence of evolution: they continue to get dumber by the day!!
Liberalism is a disease - the only cure is common sense
Liberalism is a disease - the only cure is common sense
when is your doctor appointment :shock: :?: :?: :?:
Jul 31, 2014 14:06:07 #
A common misconception by people who don't know what the f*(k they're talking about. is that evolutionn relies on new DNA being created. The fact is that only about 15% of DNA is used in any given species. The other 85% is switched off. Genetic mutation does not create new DNA, it just switches otherwise dormant genes on. That coupled with the almost infinate combinations that current DNA allows, requires no magical appearence of "new" genetic material.
Second point. Depending on your definition of life, it may have been seen to evolve from non-life. self replicating molecules have been developed. Creationists either bury their heads in the sand and say that the samples must have been contaminated, or that it doesn't count as life.
Third point. Has this person submitted his findings to his peers for review? Or is he just repeating something that he was told by someone who was told by someone who was told the same thing?
Second point. Depending on your definition of life, it may have been seen to evolve from non-life. self replicating molecules have been developed. Creationists either bury their heads in the sand and say that the samples must have been contaminated, or that it doesn't count as life.
Third point. Has this person submitted his findings to his peers for review? Or is he just repeating something that he was told by someone who was told by someone who was told the same thing?
Jul 31, 2014 14:56:32 #
Wellhiem wrote:
A common misconception by people who don't know wh... (show quote)
i still want someone to explain why some monkeys didn't make it over the hump :shock: :roll: :roll:
Jul 31, 2014 17:53:01 #
Jul 31, 2014 17:56:45 #
Jul 31, 2014 18:15:28 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
Wellhiem wrote:
A common misconception by people who don't know wh... (show quote)
Did you forget that there are NO scientific proof that evolution exists?? This is why it is still address as a "Theory" only and will always been deemed as a theory.
Jul 31, 2014 19:33:42 #
Racmanaz wrote:
A used car salesman would NEVER tell a lie and is ALWAYS honest about the cars he sells. :) Yes he talks a a little fast but it's not hard to follow and assimilate the vast information he expressed in this video. :)
True. False. Maybe. Isn't the mere existence of a used car salesman proof that evolution is a fact? No god would create such an animal.
Jul 31, 2014 20:00:17 #
Racmanaz wrote:
Did you forget that there are NO scientific proof that evolution exists?? This is why it is still address as a "Theory" only and will always been deemed as a theory.
Your ignorance of the natural world is really quite astounding. Do you maintain that there is no gravity because of the theory of gravity. I guess inertia does not exist because it is known as the theory of inertia. The fact is that evolution can in fact be proven. It can easily be demonstrated. Evolution is merely genetic change (mutation) which makes the offspring ever so slightly different from its forbears. This change can either be neutral, adaptive, or non-adaptive. This change can either be dominant or submissive. By nothing other than this mechanism new species can emerge. It is, at it's most basic, that simple. The deniers use flawed reasoning as well as outright falsehoods to convey their rigid views.
Jul 31, 2014 20:13:00 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
boberic wrote:
Your ignorance of the natural world is really quit... (show quote)
Sorry wrong once again. it is impossible to demonstrate evolution or even prove that has happened. There are no evidences of evolution known to man not now not back then not never
Jul 31, 2014 21:18:31 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
boberic wrote:
Your ignorance of the natural world is really quit... (show quote)
Gravity is not a theory it is a natural law, there are NO absolutes in a theory as there is in a law. Evolution can not be demonstrated or proved unlike gravity which can do both. Try again Sherlock lol. It's called the Law of Gravity not the theory of gravity as it is with the evolutionary theory.
Jul 31, 2014 21:38:48 #
treehugger
Loc: Eastern Idaho Highlands
If I believe it to be true, it is true.
If I believe it to be false, it is false.
If I believe a rock can dance, I see dancing rocks.
If I believe water is not wet, it is dry.
We can argue the question all we want, but the truth is, we can only believe in what what we believe. It doesn't matter what the evidence shows.
If I believe it to be false, it is false.
If I believe a rock can dance, I see dancing rocks.
If I believe water is not wet, it is dry.
We can argue the question all we want, but the truth is, we can only believe in what what we believe. It doesn't matter what the evidence shows.
Jul 31, 2014 22:10:59 #
Racmanaz wrote:
Did you forget that there are NO scientific proof that evolution exists?? This is why it is still address as a "Theory" only and will always been deemed as a theory.
Gravity is also only a theory. The so called "law of gravity", refers to the mathematical equation that the theory says affects all things. gravity, like evolution, has sufficient evidence to be accepted.
dirtpusher wrote:
i still want someone to explain why some monkeys didn't make it over the hump :shock: :roll: :roll:
No monkeys failed to make it over the jump. There was a common ancestor, some of whom specialised in living in the trees and became the forerunners of todays monkeys and apes, the rest specialising on living on the ground and became the forerunners of humans. Man did not evolve from monkeys as they are known today, but they are two seperate branches of a common species. In the same way as if your great, great grandfather had two sons, your great grand father and one other. You are related from the descendants of this other sibling, but are not directly decended from them. Evolution has never claimed that we are direct decendants from monkeys. Only people trying to debunk it have made that false claim.
Some people just refuse to progress.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.