Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Mac finder not Previewing Canon Raw files
Jul 3, 2013 22:46:54 #
ballsafire wrote:
I can't imagine that nowdays people are still shooting RAW!
I'm sorry, but I don't understand the reasoning that would lead you to make that comment. Please elucidate. Thank you.
Jul 4, 2013 01:16:24 #
ballsafire wrote:
I can't imagine that nowdays people are still shooting RAW!
???
Odd comment...from what I am seeing, Raw is just taking off and more and more people are just starting to use it.
Hence the reason raw support on software is getting bigger and more common, and more camera now seem to have a raw option.
Jul 4, 2013 13:16:41 #
ballsafire
Loc: Lafayette, Louisiana
Mogul wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't understand the reasoning that would lead you to make that comment. Please elucidate. Thank you.
A lot of effort was put into development of Jpeg etc. to get rid of useless pixles but people still would like to have things as they were with film. I have nothing against raw except that it creates more work for me and brings up the necessity of buying extra softwear. To each his own! Not much of elucitation.
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Jul 4, 2013 14:23:02 #
Yes, but once you have a JPEG you can't recover under/overexposed areas, improve sharpness etc etc.
I generally shoot both JPEG and RAW, and use the JPEG straight out for viewing on the PC. But if there are any shots that I want to full size print..then I have the raw to fall back on for a better quality print.
I am sure a lot of work went in to producing the mp3 compressed audio format.but it can sound crap when compared to a FLAC/ALAC or analogue file..
I generally shoot both JPEG and RAW, and use the JPEG straight out for viewing on the PC. But if there are any shots that I want to full size print..then I have the raw to fall back on for a better quality print.
I am sure a lot of work went in to producing the mp3 compressed audio format.but it can sound crap when compared to a FLAC/ALAC or analogue file..
Jul 3, 2014 13:43:51 #
romanticf16
Loc: Commerce Twp, MI
Neilp wrote:
Ah yes, but as I hinted at in my first post..not u... (show quote)
Apple just announced they aren't supporting iPhoto or Aperature. This could be why auto uploads stopped?
Jul 3, 2014 15:46:30 #
ballsafire
Loc: Lafayette, Louisiana
Neilp wrote:
Yes, but once you have a JPEG you can't recover under/overexposed areas, improve sharpness etc etc.
I generally shoot both JPEG and RAW, and use the JPEG straight out for viewing on the PC. But if there are any shots that I want to full size print..then I have the raw to fall back on for a better quality print.
I am sure a lot of work went in to producing the mp3 compressed audio format.but it can sound crap when compared to a FLAC/ALAC or analogue file..
I generally shoot both JPEG and RAW, and use the JPEG straight out for viewing on the PC. But if there are any shots that I want to full size print..then I have the raw to fall back on for a better quality print.
I am sure a lot of work went in to producing the mp3 compressed audio format.but it can sound crap when compared to a FLAC/ALAC or analogue file..
Just learn how to use your camera and not to have "under/overexposed areas, improve sharpness etc etc."
Jul 4, 2014 01:30:20 #
A simple comment like that instantly shows your level of knowledge of photography, histograms, ETTR, detail in darker areas and other such techniques, layers, multiple opening of jpegs for editing etc etc. Only even bothering to reply since I am bored and this could become an interesting bit of sport...dragging up an old thread like this just to pass on an insult...one word springs to mind ....troll
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Travel Photography - Tips and More section of our forum.