Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Thoughts about taking a DSLR on a cruise
Page <<first <prev 8 of 8
Jun 27, 2014 23:06:31   #
djenrette Loc: Philadelphia
 
SonyA580 wrote:
Have to agree with flyerace ...., the 18-200 will suffice for 98% of the situations you will encounter.


Agreed -- you can have the 18-200 with you all the time and it won't weigh you down and it won't tempt too many grabbers who might be interested in a full camera bag. I just finished a multi-day family trip to Disney and Sea World and my 18-300 was all I needed (18-200 would have been almost as good, and I have used that length on many occasions. Of course, if it was a paying assignment I would have taken faster and more varied glass.)

Reply
Jun 29, 2014 09:18:44   #
OzJohn Loc: Perth - Western Australia
 
The only thing I'd be concerned about is why this ridiculous question was asked in the first place . . .

Reply
Jun 29, 2014 16:12:35   #
architect Loc: Chattanooga
 
OzJohn wrote:
The only thing I'd be concerned about is why this ridiculous question was asked in the first place . . .

Gee John. The question is not ridiculous, and it elicited a broad range of opinions, which is helpful, from many of us who have done some cruise trips. Are you just bored? Or just a mean old man?

Reply
 
 
Jun 29, 2014 16:55:09   #
drmarty Loc: Pine City, NY
 
phlash46 wrote:
I'd take the 5200, the 18-200 and the 35. That should cover 99% of what you need. I wouldn't bother with the WA and the tele.


:thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Jun 30, 2014 09:37:39   #
OzJohn Loc: Perth - Western Australia
 
Gee Architect, I dunno mate . . .
I guess I was looking at a guy who has the nous to buy a D5200 and a bunch of lenses, subsequently affords to takes his wife on a cruise around the Caribbean and then asks what the hell lens should he include with his friggin’ camera.
Jeeze, are we all a truck-load of mind readers? A D5200 with the 18-200 hanging off the end should be more than adequate for 95% of anything he’s likely to encounter on a boat. If he should stumble across a startling scenario that actually requires the 11-16mm then, like a rat up a drainpipe, he should quickly regret his lack of foresight, resign himself to his hideous fate and forego the opportunity for a once-in-a-lifetime happy snap.

Reply
Jun 30, 2014 10:08:37   #
architect Loc: Chattanooga
 
OzJohn wrote:
Gee Architect, I dunno mate . . .
I guess I was looking at a guy who has the nous to buy a D5200 and a bunch of lenses, subsequently affords to takes his wife on a cruise around the Caribbean and then asks what the hell lens should he include with his friggin’ camera.
Jeeze, are we all a truck-load of mind readers? A D5200 with the 18-200 hanging off the end should be more than adequate for 95% of anything he’s likely to encounter on a boat. If he should stumble across a startling scenario that actually requires the 11-16mm then, like a rat up a drainpipe, he should quickly regret his lack of foresight, resign himself to his hideous fate and forego the opportunity for a once-in-a-lifetime happy snap.
Gee Architect, I dunno mate . . . br I guess I was... (show quote)


:)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 8
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.