SonyA580 wrote:
Have to agree with flyerace ...., the 18-200 will suffice for 98% of the situations you will encounter.
Agreed -- you can have the 18-200 with you all the time and it won't weigh you down and it won't tempt too many grabbers who might be interested in a full camera bag. I just finished a multi-day family trip to Disney and Sea World and my 18-300 was all I needed (18-200 would have been almost as good, and I have used that length on many occasions. Of course, if it was a paying assignment I would have taken faster and more varied glass.)
OzJohn
Loc: Perth - Western Australia
The only thing I'd be concerned about is why this ridiculous question was asked in the first place . . .
OzJohn wrote:
The only thing I'd be concerned about is why this ridiculous question was asked in the first place . . .
Gee John. The question is not ridiculous, and it elicited a broad range of opinions, which is helpful, from many of us who have done some cruise trips. Are you just bored? Or just a mean old man?
OzJohn
Loc: Perth - Western Australia
Gee Architect, I dunno mate . . .
I guess I was looking at a guy who has the nous to buy a D5200 and a bunch of lenses, subsequently affords to takes his wife on a cruise around the Caribbean and then asks what the hell lens should he include with his friggin camera.
Jeeze, are we all a truck-load of mind readers? A D5200 with the 18-200 hanging off the end should be more than adequate for 95% of anything hes likely to encounter on a boat. If he should stumble across a startling scenario that actually requires the 11-16mm then, like a rat up a drainpipe, he should quickly regret his lack of foresight, resign himself to his hideous fate and forego the opportunity for a once-in-a-lifetime happy snap.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.